A Retrospective Study on Postoperative Complications in Gynecological Surgeries: Identification of High-Risk Factors and Best Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2025.14.35Keywords:
Gynecologic laparoscopy, postoperative complications, risk factors, surgical safety, minimally invasive surgery, retrospective studyAbstract
Background: Laparoscopic gynecologic surgery is widely favored for its minimally invasive nature, offering reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. However, despite its advantages, postoperative complications—ranging from minor infections to major injuries—remain a concern. Identifying patient- and procedure-specific risk factors is critical to enhancing surgical safety and outcomes.
Objective: To evaluate the incidence and predictors of postoperative complications in gynecologic laparoscopic surgeries and identify high-risk patient and procedural factors using a large, retrospective dataset.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 15,308 patients who underwent laparoscopic gynecologic procedures at tertiary care hospitals in Pune, India, between January 2023 and October 2024. Patients were categorized by procedure type: adnexal surgery, myomectomy/uterine lesion surgery, LAVH/TLH, and malignancy surgery. Data on demographics, prior surgical history, comorbidities, and surgical details were collected. Complications were classified as major (e.g., bowel or ureteral injury, hemorrhage requiring reoperation) or minor (e.g., infection, transient fever). Multivariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors for major complications.
Results: The overall major complication rate was 0.51%, and the minor complication rate was 4.64%. Surgeries for malignancy had the highest major complication rate. Independent risk factors for major complications included age 31–60 years (aOR: 2.88; 95% CI: 1.89–7.88), age >60 years (aOR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.67–5.65), prior abdominal surgery (aOR: 3.58; 95% CI: 1.38–6.54), obesity (aOR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.39–7.28), and higher surgical complexity (e.g., malignancy surgery vs. adnexal: aOR: 7.62; 95% CI: 3.61–13.63).
Conclusion: Although complication rates in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery remain low, advanced age, obesity, previous abdominal surgery, and complex procedures significantly increase the risk of major complications. These findings underscore the need for thorough preoperative assessment, individualized surgical planning, and targeted risk mitigation strategies to optimize patient outcomes.
References
Le A, Xu Y, Cui J. Identifying Risk Factors for Complications in Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Study. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2023; 50(12): 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5012262
Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Hermans J, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104(5): 595-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11539.x
Twijnstra AR, Blikkendaal MD, van Zwet EW, van Kesteren PJM, de Kroon CD, Jansen FW. Predictors of successful surgical outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119(4): 700-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824b1966
Kremer C, Duffy S, Luesley D. Complications of gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a prospectie study. Gynecol Endosc 2000; 9(6): 379-384.
Donnez J, Jadoul P. Laparoscopic myomectomy: indications, techniques and outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18(4): 729-739.
Aarts JWM, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (8): CD003677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5
Boosz AS, Hamer J, Sehouli J, et al. Predictors of complications in gynecological laparoscopy: a German monocenter analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10(19): 4527.
Härkki-Siren P, Kurki T. A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89(1): 108-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00390-0
Sinha R, Sundaram M, Lakhotia S, Mahajan C, Rao G. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women: a comparative study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20(4): 431-436.
Sukcharoen N, Saengprom A, Suwannarurk K. Risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic gynecologic surgery to laparotomy: a 5-year experience. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 29(4): 202-208. ∙Buhur M, Unal B. Prevention and Treatment of Intraoperative Complications During Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: Practical Tips and Tricks—A Narrative Review. Adv Ther 2025; 42(1): 1-15.
Lavikainen A, et al. Risk of Thrombosis and Bleeding in Gynecologic Noncancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 231(1): 11.e1-11.e13.
Mou T, et al. Postoperative Complications After Abdominal, Laparoscopic, and Vaginal Hysterectomy for Uteri Weighing 250 Grams or Less. Gynecol Pelvic Med 2023; 6(1): 3. doi: 10.21037/gpm-22-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gpm-22-44
Gracia M, et al. Comparison Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery in Women Over 65 Years Old with Gynecological Malignancies. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2024; 45(1): 83-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22514/ejgo.2024.013
Bruno M, et al. Risk Assessment Model for Complications in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20(1): 234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010234
Chapron C, et al. Complications of Laparoscopy: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105(8): 853-858.
Seymour NE, et al. Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study. Ann Surg 2002; 236(4): 458-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008
Nelson G, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Guidelines for Gynecologic Oncology: Addressing Implementation Challenges—2023 Update. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 173(1): 58-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
