International Survey about Perceptions of Courts’ Role in Addressing Social Issues through Problem-Solving Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2025.04.07Keywords:
Problem-solving courts, community sentiment, specialty courts, cross-cultural, social issues, United States, Canada, AustraliaAbstract
Purpose of the study: Community sentiment is a collective group of attitudes toward an object–such as problem-solving courts–which could differ between populations. This study addresses community sentiment regarding whether the courts should address social problems and whether community sentiment differs based on the type of problem-solving court. It also investigates whether the perceived responsibility of courts to address social issues differs based on country (United States, Australia, and Canada) or individual differences, as well as whether group or individual differences are more predictive of support for problem-solving courts. Method: We surveyed citizens in the U.S., Australia, and Canada using an online survey. Results: We found that participants had positive community sentiment toward all four (drug, homelessness, mental health, tribal wellness/Aboriginal) problem-solving courts and community sentiment did not differ between countries. We also found that endorsement of therapeutic jurisprudence was the largest predictor for community sentiment toward all four courts. Conclusion: We found that sentiment was positive but similar in all countries. Individual differences (e.g., authoritarianism, support for justice principles, and attributions for crime) were stronger predictors than country of residence. This study can help encourage the creation of specialty courts to address social issues.
References
Alberta Court of Justice. n.d. “Mental Health Courts” [online]. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://alber-tacourts.ca/cj/areas-of-law/criminal/mental-health-court
Altemeyer, Bob. 1981. Right-Wing Authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
American Bar Association, n.d. “Homeless courts: Taking the court to the street” [online]. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/homelessness_poverty/one-pagers/homeless-court-one-pager.pdf
Berman, Greg, and John Feinblatt. 2001. “Problem-Solving Courts: A Brief Primer.” Law and Policy 23(2):125-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9930.00107
Blagg, Harry. 2013. “‘A Problem Shared...?’ Some Reflections on Problem-solving Courts and Court Innovation in Australia.” Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review 5:24-38.
Canadian Drug Policy Coalition. 2022. Legal Regulation [online]. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://drugpolicy.ca/our-work/issues/legal-regulation/
Chomos, Juliana C., and Monica K. Miller. 2015. “Understanding how individual differences are related to community sentiment toward safe haven laws using a student sample.” Pp. 83-97 in Handbook of Community Sentiment, edited by M.K. Miller, J.A. Blumenthal, and J. Chamberlain. New York, NY: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1899-7_6
Cochran, John K., Denise Paquette Boots, and Mitchell B. Chamlin. 2006. “Political Identity and Support for Capital Punishment: A Test of Attribution Theory.” Journal of Crime and Justice 29(1):45-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2006.9721217
Durham, Rebekah. 2022. “Comparing Property Rights of Native Americans and Indigenous Australians.” [online]. University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://uclawreview.org/2020/11/10/ comparing-property-rights-of-native-americans-and-indigenous-australians/
Fishkin, James S. and Robert C. Luskin. 2005. “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta Politica [online] 40:284–298. Accessed on September 26, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
Frailing, Kelly. 2010. “How Mental Health Courts Function: Outcomes and Observations.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 33(4):207-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.001
Fulton Hora, Hon. Peggy. 2002. “A Dozen Years of Drug Treatment Courts: Uncovering our Theoretical Foundation and the Construction of a Mainstream Paradigm.” Substance Use and Misuse [online] 37(12-13):1469-1488. Accessed on September 26, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014419
Goldkamp, John S., Michael D. White and Jennifer B. Robinson. 2001. “Do Drug Courts Work? Getting Inside the Drug Court Black Box.” Journal of Drug Issues 31(1):27-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260103100104
Grasmick, Harold G. and Anne L. McGill. 1994. “Religion, Attribution Style, and Punitiveness Toward Juvenile Offenders.” Criminology 32(1):23-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01145.x
Hawkins, Darnell F. 1981. “Causal Attribution and Punishment for Crime.” Deviant Behavior 2(3):207-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1981.9967554
Heider, Fritz. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
Hopper, Tristin. 2022. “Canadians fed up with homelessness and governments” [online]. National Post. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadians-fed-up-with-homelessness/wcm/c1f5b611-80a5-4059-8fde-38ff9651377a/
Huang, Peter H. and Ho-Mou Wu. 1994. “More Order without More Law: A Theory of Social Norms and Organizational Cultures.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 10(2):390–406.
Jacobs, David and Jason T. Carmichael. 2002. “The Political Sociology of the Death Penalty: A Pooled Time-Series Analysis.” American Sociological Review 109-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240206700106
Jordan, Dominic. 2015. “Public Perceptions of the Perth Drug Court as a Mechanism for Dealing with Drug Related Crime.” Bachelor’s Thesis, Department of Criminology and Justice, Edith Cowan University. Available at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/1464
Kaplan, Tatyana, Monica K. Miller and Emily F. Wood. 2018. “Looking Backward, Looking Forward: How the Evolution of Specialty Courts Can Inform the Courts of Tomorrow.” Court Review 54:14-24.
McDougall, Ainslie, MaryAnn Campbell, Teresa Smith, Angela Burbridge, Naomi Doucette, and Donaldo D. Canales. 2012. “An Analysis of General Public and Professional's Attitudes about Mental Health Courts: Predictors of a Positive Perspective.” International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 11(3):203-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.723666
Miller, Monica K. 2019. “A Qualitative Analysis and Eleven-Factor Typology of Factors Encouraging or Discouraging the Development of Problem-Solving Courts in Various Countries.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 16:79-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09368-z
Miller, Monica K., Jeremy A. Blumenthal and Jared Chamberlain, eds. 2015. Handbook of Community Sentiment. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1899-7
Miller, Monica K. and Jared Chamberlain. 2015. “‘There Ought to Be a Law!’: Understanding Community Sentiment.” Pp. 3-28 in Handbook of Community Sentiment, edited by M. K. Miller, J. A. Blumenthal, and J. Chamberlain. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1899-7_1
Miller, Monica K. and Amber Westbrook. 2021. “The Social Mind-set Model potentially explains varying societies’ responses to social and criminal behavior.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 11:S404-S424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1250
Miller, Monica K., Lauren M. Block and Alicia DeVault. 2020. “Problem-Solving Courts in the United States and Around the World: History, Evaluation, and Recommendations.” Pp. 301-371 in Advances in Psychology and Law. Vol. 5, edited by M. K. Miller and B. H. Bornstein. New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54678-6_9
Murphy, Kristina, Elise Sargeant and Adrian Cherney. 2015. “The Importance of Procedural Justice and Police Performance in Shaping Intentions to Cooperate with the Police: Does Social Identity Matter?” European Journal of Criminology 12(6):719-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815587766
Nolan, James L. 2009. Legal Accents, Legal Borrowing: The International Problem-Solving Court Movement. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830794
Nolan, James L. 2010. “Harm Reduction and the American Difference: Drug Treatment and Problem-Solving Courts in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Health Care Law and Policy 13:31-47.
Payne, Jason. 2006. “Specialty Courts: Current Issues and Future Prospects” [online]. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abs-tracts/specialty-courts-current-issues-and-future-prospects
Queensland Health. 2016. “Mental Health Court” [online]. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0028/444961/mental-health-court-fact.pdf
Reichert, Jenny and Monica K. Miller. 2017. “Social Cognitive Processes and Attitudes Toward Legal Actions: Does Receiving Information Affect Community Sentiment?” Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice 13:70-95.
Remington, Paige. 2019. “Drug Decriminalisation in the United States and Australia” [online]. United States Studies Centre. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://www.ussc.edu.au/analysis/drug-decriminalisation-in-the-united-states-and-australia
Rossman, Shelli B., John K. Roman, Janine M. Zweig, Michael Rempel and Christine H. Lindquist. 2011. The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation: The Impact of Drug Courts [online]. Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://www.urban.org/ sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/412357-The-Multi-site-Adult-Drug-Court-Evaluation-The-Impact-of-Drug-Courts-Pre-Production-.PDF
Shanahan, Marian, Emily Lancsar, Marion Haas, Bronwyn Lind, Don Weatherburn and Shuling Chen. 2004. “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the New South Wales Adult Drug Court Program.” Evaluation Review 28(1):3-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X03257531
Somers, Julian M., Lauren Currie, Akm Moniruzzaman, Faith Eiboff and Michelle Patterson. 2012. “Drug Treatment Court of Vancouver: An Empirical Evaluation of Recidivism.” International Journal of Drug Policy 23(5):393-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.01.011
Strong, Suzanne M., Ramona R. Rantala and Tracey Kyckelhahn. 2016. “Census of problem-solving courts, 2012” [online]. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpsc12.pdf
Templeton, Laura J. and Timothy F. Hartnagel. 2012. “Causal Attributions of Crime and the Public's Sentencing Goals.” Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 54(1):45-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2010.E.29
Thielo, Angela J., Francis T. Cullen, Alexander L. Burton, Melissa M. Moon and Velmer S, Burton Jr. 2019. “Prisons or Problem-Solving: Does the Public Support Specialty Courts?” Victims and Offenders [online] 14(3):267–282. Accessed on September 26, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2019.1595243
Tribal Law and Policy Institute. 2003. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance [online]. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/bja/188154.pdf
Torres, Francis. 2023. “U.S. Opinions on Homelessness: A BPC/Morning Consult Poll” [online]. Bipartisan Policy Center. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/us-opinions-homelessness-poll/
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57:375–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
Tyler, Tom R. and Robert J. Boeckmann. 1997. “Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers.” Law and Society Review 31(2):237-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053926
Tyler, Tom R. and Kenneth Rasinski. 1991. “Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson.” Law and Society Review 25(3):621–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053729
U.S. Department of Justice. 2021. “Drug Courts” [online]. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/238527.pdf
U.S. Department of Justice, n.d. “Mental Health Courts Program: Overview” [online]. Bureau of Justice Assistance. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://bja.ojp.gov/program/mental-health-courts-program-overview
Unnever, James D., John K. Cochran, Francis T. Cullen and Brandon K. Applegate. 2010. “The Pragmatic American: Attributions of Crime and the Hydraulic Relation Hypothesis.” Justice Quarterly 27(3):431-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902855362
Wesley Mission. 2018. “Perceptions of Homelessness in Australia: How to Make our Compassion Count” [online]. Wesley Mission. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://www.wesleymission.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Perceptions-of-Homelessness-Report.pdf
Wexler, David B. 2000. “Therapeutic Jurisprudence: An Overview.” Thomas M. Cooley Law Review 17:125-134.
Young, Robert L. 1991. “Race, Conceptions of Crime and Justice, and Support for the Death Penalty.” Social Psychology Quarterly 54(1):67-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786789
Zhao, Selena. 2021. “A Progressive Facade: Comparing the U.S. and Canada’s Treatment of Indigenous Peoples” [online]. Harvard Political Review. Accessed on September 26, 2025. Available at: https://harvardpolitics.com/a-progressive-facade-comparing-the-u-s-and-canadas-treatment-of-indigenous-peoples/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
