The Role of a Condominium’s Association in Adapting, Complying, and Self-Reducing Anxiety in Response to COVID-19 Precautionary Measures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2022.01.05Keywords:
Perception of COVID-19 risk, impact on precautionary behaviours, condominium residents, cooperative games, rates of risk-taking behavioursAbstract
Our article is part of a micro-inquiry into the small reality of co-ownership to formulate hypotheses on the evaluation of behaviors (non-pharmaceutical precautionary measures) in addition to pharmaceutical actions put in place by the authorities against future pandemics. Our article takes its first steps in the fact that one of the most common ways to fight the COVID-19 virus is to avoid close contact between people. Indeed, our condominium meetings have been canceled at the first COVID-19 vague (in late February 2020), and social distancing as well as the use of masks and hand sanitizer in the concierge are measures still adopted at the end of 2022. External people (parents, visitors in general, and patients from the three health offices housed in the condominium) have been reduced, and certain businesses, such as bed and breakfasts, which were operating until 2019, had been closed following the first vague of COVID-19 pandemics. The general condominium association has been centralized under the conscious direction of the doorman led by the administrator of the condominium and a support lawyer. Stray animals at the foot of the condominium and fed by a couple of residents have been reduced to the strict minimum. On a sample of 39 people questioned and from an age range between 17 and 93 years, actually residing in the condominium and excluding those members of families who do not actually reside there, we inquired how the risk of COVID-19 infection has decreased over the past year (December 2021-December 2022). The useful variables to determine the correlations between the precautionary behaviors adopted by the co-owners and a possible reduction in the risk of infection are: 1) size of the family (self-observed); 2) level of education (self-observed); 3) professional status (self-observed); 4) salary (self-observed); 5) travel history (self-observed); 6) annual charity (self-observed estimate); 7) confidence in sustainability (interviews via mobile chat); 8) doses of vaccines already taken to the time of the survey (interviews via mobile chat); and 9) depressive symptoms (interviews via mobile chat). Our survey targets to highlight how residents’ safety in the case of one of the most recent periods of COVID-19 pandemics—i. e. the starting winter season 2022‒2023—is somehow safeguarded by cooperative games because of condominiums rules’ fulfillment as well as by socio-juridical precautionary measures taken by the ruling association.
References
Sun J, He WT, Wang L, Lai A, Ji X, Zhai X, Li G, Suchard MA, Tian J, Zhou J, Veit M, Su S. COVID-19: Epidemiology, Evolution, and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Trends in Molecular Medicine 2020; 26(5): 483-495. Retrieved from: (lastly retrieved March 19, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2020.02.008
Connecticut General Assembly. Research Report. Office of Legislative Research. 2020. Retrieved from: Condominium Meetings and Elections During COVID-19 Pandemic (lastly retrieved December 31, 2022).
Italian Health Ministry. Urgent measures to face epidemiological emergency from COVID-19 and for the exercise in safety of social and economic activities. (21G00117). Official Journal no. 175, July 23, 2021 (original title: Misure urgenti per fronteggiare l’emergenza epidemiologica da COVID-19 e per l’esercizio in sicurezza di attività sociali ed economiche). Retrieved from: Trova Norme & Concorsi - Normativa Sanitaria (salute.gov.it) (lastly retrieved December 29, 2022).
Luke TJ, Alceste F. The mechanisms of minimization: How interrogation tactics suggest lenient sentencing through pragmatic implication. Law Hum Behav 2020; 44(4): 266-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000410
Teng C-C, Li S, Yang JJ. Family control, external governance mechanisms, and dividend payouts. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 2021; 79: 198-209. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976920300697 (lastly retrieved December 31, 2022).
Mizrahi S. Performance Management, Gaming, and Monitoring in Democratic Systems. In: Public Policy and Performance Management in Democratic Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52350-7_3
King M, Schütz A. The Ambitious Modesty of Niklas Luhmann. Journal of Law and Society 1994; 21(3): 261-287. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1410736?seq=1 (lastly retrieved December 29, 2022).
Ramkissoon H. COVID-19 Place Confinement, Pro-Social, Pro-environmental Behaviors, and Residents' Wellbeing: A New Conceptual Framework. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 2248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02248
Viskovatoff A. Foundations of Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1999; 29(4): 481-516. Retrieved from (99+) Foundations of Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Social Systems | Alexander Viskovatoff - Academia.edu (lastly retrieved December 31, 2022).
Dinga E, Tănăsescu C-R, Ionescu G-M. Social Entropy and Normative Network. Entropy 2020; 22: 1051. Retrieved from: (lastly retrieved December 29, 2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/e22091051
Louie AH. Robert Rosen’s anticipatory systems. Foresight 2010; 12(3): 18-29. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/A-Louie/publication/ 228091658_Robert_Rosen's_anticipatory_systems/links/09e4150cdd961e4a87000000/Robert-Rosens-anticipatory-systems.pdf (lastly retrieved December 29, 2022).
Paetau M. Niklas Luhmann and Cybernetics. Journal of Sociocybernetics 2013; 11(1/2): 75-103. (lastly retrieved December 29, 2022) https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_jos/jos.20131/2790
Chen TY, Piltch-Loeb R, Harriman NW, Testa M, Savoia E. A Descriptive Analysis of the Relationship between Social Media Use and Vaccine Hesitancy among a Sample of Unvaccinated Adults in Canada. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10(12): 2096. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10122096
Calcopietro M. La situation actuelle de la demographie en Italie [Medical doctors in Italy: a situation analysis]. Cah Sociol Demogr Med 2002; 42(1): 113-48. French. PMID: 12050938.
Amodio E, Genovese D, Fallucca A, Ferro P, Sparacia B, D’Azzo L, Fertitta A, Maida CM, Vitale F. Clinical Severity in Different Waves of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Sicily: A Model of Smith’s “Law of Declining Virulence” from Real-World Data. Viruses 2023; 15: 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15010125