Understanding the Nitty-Gritty of Up-to-Date of Pakistan’s Customs Act, 1969
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.09Keywords:
Historical perspective of Customs Act, 1969, Methods of valuation of goods, Powers of Adjudication and Appellate forums, Trial of offence(s)Abstract
Pakistan’s Customs Act, 1969 was enacted consolidating and amending the various laws on Customs. There are mainly six methods of valuation of goods including transaction value method, identical goods method, similar goods method, deductive methods, computed method and fall back method. Under Section 79 of the Act, Goods Declaration is filed duly supported by various documents for assessment of leviable duty and taxes. In case of misdeclaration, untrue statement or error etc. section 32 comes into play. Search Warrant is to be obtained by the Gazetted Officer of Customs from the Judicial Magistrate to recover the secreted goods under Section 162 of the Act, Seizure of things liable to confiscation is made under Section 168 of the Act. Section 156 provides the scope of offence(s), nature of breach and penalty thereof. Section 187 of the Act fixes initial burden of proof upon the person involved, which may be rebutted by the Customs authorities. The purpose of adjudication includes confiscation of goods, recovery of duty and other taxes not levied or short levied, recovery of erroneously refunded amount and imposition of fine. An option to fine in lieu of confiscation of goods can be given under Section 181 of the Act. The pecuniary power of adjudication is provided under Section 179 of the Act, whereas there are Appellate forums available in the form of Collector Appeals, Customs Appellate Tribunal and High Court. In addition to this, another mechanism under Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) is available under Section 195-C of the Act. In case of commission of cognizable offence, a FIR is lodged and a Special Judge takes cognizance of the offence(s) under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1989. An appeal or Revision can be filed before the Court having the Powers High Court. The main challenge before the Customs is determination of value of goods paid or payable in relation to the item being valued. In case inaccurate value, either it is the business class who suffers or the state’s fiscal interests are jeopardized on account of lack of requisite capacity of the Customs Officer to successfully address the issue of value of goods and pass the buck onto the importer for charging misdeclaration and a lengthy process of adjudication is initiated against the importer and exporter as well as Clearing Agent as this value holds good for the imposition of Sales Tax, Income Tax and Federal Excise duty.
References
Pakistan Customs Tariff 2022-2023 volume 1 38th Edition
Customs Laws of Pakistan “The Customs Act,1969 by Najib A Chaudhary.
Import and Customs Law Handbook by Michael J. Horton
Rehan Umer vs. Collector of Customs (2006 PTD 909,Najam Impex Lahore vs. Asst. Collector of Customs, Karachi (2008 PTD 1250, Fecto Trading Co. vs. Member Customs, Federal Board of Revenue (2013 PTD 825), Goodwill Traders Karachi vs. Federation of Pakistan (2014 PTD 176)
2019 PTD 1776 SC Collector of Customs vs. Faisal Enterprise
2012 PTD 898
2022 PTD 1059
2023PTD 9
Import and Customs Law Handbook by Michael J. Horton
Finance Act 2006
2023 PTD 9 Sindh High Court MessrsZakwan Steel and others vs. The Federation of Pakistan
PTCL1991CL177
SRO 112 (I)/83 dated February 12, 1983 (reported as PTCL 1983st.330)
SRO 639 (I)/2015 reported PTCL 2016 St. 252
PTCL 1986 CL. 253
PTCL 2009 CL.330
PTCL1992 CL.155
PTCL 1992 CL.155+ PTCL 2011 CL. 423
PTCL 1998 CL435
The Modern Law of Evidence’ by Mr. Adrian Keans
Article 121 of Qanun-e-Shahdat Order, 1984
PLD 1996 Karachi 68 Kamran Industries vs. Collector of Customs
https:// acrosslogistics.com
PTCL 2001 CL 615
PTCL 1983CL184
PTCL 1983 CL 280
PTCL 1988 CL. 172