The Status of CIF Contracts between the Sale of Goods and the Sale of Documents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.14Keywords:
CIF Contracts, International Trade Law, Sale of Goods, Sale of Documents, Risk Transfer.Abstract
The intricate nature of international trade is encapsulated in the complexities of CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) contracts, which stand at the intersection of the sale of goods and the sale of documents. This paper seeks to dissect the pivotal roles played by documents and goods within CIF contracts and to ascertain whether these contracts are more accurately defined as sales of documents rather than sales of goods. By examining legal cases and dissecting the contractual obligations of parties involved in CIF contracts, this study aims to shed light on the essence of these contracts in the context of international law and trade practices.
The research is divided into four main parts. Initially, it analyzes the duties of parties and the role of CIF documents in the sale of goods. The second part delves into the implications of documents and goods concerning the transfer of risk and property, probing into the critical claim of documents. The third part scrutinizes the buyer's right to refuse the documents or the goods, and which aspect takes precedence. The fourth part evaluates the claim that CIF contracts made en route are essentially 'sales of documents'.
This study culminates by presenting arguments on the nature of CIF contracts, weighing the significance of documents against the goods themselves. Despite the increasing tendency to use documents to represent physical goods in trade, this paper concludes that CIF contracts inherently constitute contracts for the sale of goods. It highlights the distinctive rights related to the rejection of either documents or goods, thereby reinforcing the primacy of the actual goods over their documentary representations in CIF contracts.
References
Armitage v Nurse [1998] Ch. 241
Arnold Karberg & Co. v Blythe, Greene, Jourdain & Co. Theodor Schneider & Co. v. Burgett & Newsam [1915] 2 K.B. 379.
Arnold Karberg & Co. v Blythe, Greene, Jourdain & Co. Theodor Schneider & Co. v. Burgett & Newsam [1916] 1 KB 495
Bangladesh Export Import Co Ltd v Sucden Kerry SA [1995] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 1
Baskind E, Osborne G and Roach L, Commercial Law (Third edition, Oxford University Press 2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825975.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198825975.001.0001
Berman HJ and Kaufman C, ‘Law of International Commercial Transactions (Lex Mercatoria)’ [1978] Harvard International Law Journal 221 <https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hilj19&i=250>
Biddell Brothers v E. Clement Horst Company [1911] 1 K.B. 214
Biddell Brothers v E. Clement Horst Company [1912] AC 18
Bowden Bros & Co Ltd v Little (1907) 4 C.L.R. 1364
Bridge MG (ed), Benjamin’s Sale of Goods (Tenth edition, Sweet & Maxwell 2017)
C Groom Ltd v Barber [1915] 1 KB 316
Cargill International SA v Bangladesh Sugar & Food Industries Corp [1996] 4 All E.R. 563
Carr I, International Trade Law (6th edn, Routledge 2017) <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315543970> accessed 10 May 2020 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315543970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315543970
Comptoir d’Achat et de Vente du Boerenbond Belge S.A. v Luis de Ridder Limitada (The Julia) [1949] AC 293
Congimex Companhia Geral, etc. SARL v Tradax Export SA [1983] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 250
Continental Imes Ltd. v Dibble (HE) (1952) 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 220
Couturier v Hastie [1856] 5 HLC 673
Chuah J, Law of International Trade: Cross-Border Commercial Transactions (5. ed, Sweet & Maxwell [u.a] 2013)
Duncan, Fox & Co v Schrempft & Bonke [1915] 1 K.B.
Empres ortadora a Expde Azucar v Industria Azucarera Nacional SA (The Playa Larga) [1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 171
Gill & Duffus SA v Berger Co Inc [1984] AC 382
Goode R, Kronke H and McKendrick E, Transnational Commercial Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Oxford University Press 2015) <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/ detail.action?docID=4083329>
H Glynn (Covent Garden) Ltd v Wittleder [1959] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 409.
Hindley & Co Ltd v East Indian Produce Co Ltd [1973] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 515
Holland Colombo Trading Soc. Ltd v Alawdeen [1954] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 45
Ireland v. Livingston [1872] LR 5 HL 395.
Johnson v Taylor Bros [1920] AC [144]
Kwei Tek Chao (Trading as Zung Fu Co) v British Traders and Shippers [1954] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 1
Kwei Tek Chao (Trading as Zung Fu Co) v British Traders and Shippers [1954] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 16
Lloyd v Fleming [1872] L.R. 7 Q.B. 299
Lorenzon F and others, CIF and FOB Contracts (5th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2012)
Lightburn JJ and Nienaber GM, ‘Out-Turn Clauses in Cif Contracts in the Oil Trade’ [1987]
Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 177
Lista A, International Commercial Sales: The Sale of Goods on Shipment Terms (1st edn, Informa Law from Routledge 2016) https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767086-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767086-1
<https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317662389> accessed 10 May 2020
M Golodetz & Co Inc v Czarnikow Rionda Co Inc (The Galatia) [1980] 1 W.L.R. 495
Manbré Saccharine Co Ltd v Corn Products Co Ltd [1919] 1 K.B. 198
Meyerstein v Barber [1867] L R 2 CP 661
Murray C and others, Schmitthoff the Law and Practice of International Trade (12th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2012)
Odeke A, ‘The Nature of CIF Contract-Is It a Sale of Documents or Sale of Goods?’ (1993) 6 Journal of Contract Law 158
Orient Co. v. Brekke & Howlid, [1913] 1 K.B. 531
Panchaud Freres SA v Establissements General Grain Co [1970] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 53 CA
Peter Cremer v Brinkers Groudstoffen NV [1980] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 605
Polenghi v Dried Milk Co Ltd [1904] 10 Com. Cas. 42
Roth WVJr and Roth WVI, ‘Incoterms: Facilitating Trade in the Asian Pacific Essay’ [1997] University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 731 <https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/upjiel18&i=749>
Sale of Goods Act 1979
Scottish & Newcastle International Ltd v Othon Ghalanos Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1750
Scottish & Newcastle International Ltd v Othon Ghalanos Ltd [2007] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 341
Shipton, Anderson & Co v John Weston & Co [1922] 10 Ll. L.R. 762
SIAT di del Ferro v. Tradax Overseas SA [1978] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 470
Thayer PW, ‘C.I.F. Contracts in International Commerce’ [1939] Harvard Law Review 792 https://doi.org/10.2307/1333838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1333838
The Gabbiano [1940] 166
Toepfer v Lenersan-Poortman NV (1980) 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 143 (CA)
Trasimex Holdings SA v Addax BV [1999] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 28
Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods 1980