Validation of Multiple Solute Model for Application to Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration and Comparison with Modified Resistance in Series Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5030.2013.02.02.5Keywords:
Modeling, Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration, multiple solute model, resistance in series, cross flow, gel polarizationAbstract
Modified resistance in series model and multiple solute models have been studied for its application in micellar enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF). Experimental results for separation of Ni(II) ions from synthetic wastewater with anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and nonionic surfactant Tween 80 are used for validation of mathematical models. Modified resistance in series model is characterized by model parameters such as specific resistance α0, membrane resistance Rm and mass transfer coefficient k. Whereas, multiple solute model is characterized by the parameters such as membrane resistance Rm, permeability coefficient Pm, back transport coefficient Kbi and mass transfer coefficient ki for each solute in the system. These parameters are estimated by using the Levenberg-Marquardt method coupled with the Gauss-Newton algorithm using MATLAB. The simulation results for multiple solute model are in good agreement with the experimental results as compared to the simulation results obtained by using modified resistance in series model.
References
[1] Baker RW. Membrane Technology and Applications, second ed., McGraw-Hill, New York 2000.
[2] Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1996.
[3] Manchalwar SM, Anthati VA, Marathe KV. Simulation of micellar enhanced ultrafiltration by multiple solute model. Jof Hazardous Mater 2010; 184: 485-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.060
[4] Monfared MA, Kasiri N, Salahi A, Mohammadi T. Modeling ultrafiltration of gelatin–water suspension by computational fluid dynamics. Chem Eng Res Design (CHERD) 2011; 90: 1098-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2011.11.010
[5] Tansel B, Bao WY, Tansel IN. Characterization of fouling kinetics in ultrafiltration systems by resistance in series model. Desalination 2000; 129: 7-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00046-1
[6] Kumar NSK, Yes MK, Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration of soy protein concentrate: performance and modeling of spiral and tubular polymeric modules. J Membr Sci 2004; 244: 235-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.056
[7] Gehlert G, Adbulkadir M, Fuhrmann J, Hapke J. Dynamic modeling of an ultra filtration module for use in a membrane bioreactor. J Membr Sci 2005; 248: 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.09.026
[8] Bhattacharjee C, Datta S. Analysis of polarized layer resistance during ultrafiltration of PEG-6000: an approach based on filtration theory. Sep Purif Technol 2003; 33: 115- 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(02)00142-9
[9] Yeh HM, Cheng TW. Resistance-in-Series for Membrane Ultrafiltration in Hollow Fibers of Tube-and-Shell Arrangement. Sep Sci Technol 1993; 28: 1341-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01496399308018041
[10] Paris J, Guichardon P, Charbit F. Transport phenomena in ultrafiltration: a new two dimensional model compared with classical models. J Membr Sci 2002; 207: 43-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00752-9
[11] Chhatre AJ, Marathe KV. Modeling and performance study of MEUF of divalent metal ions in aqueous streams. Sep Sci Technol 2008; 43(11): 3286-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01496390802212641
[12] Das C, DasGupta S, De S. Prediction of permeate flux and counterion binding during crossflow micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. Colloids Surf A 2008; 318: 125-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.12.027
[13] Jadhav SR, Verma N, Sharma A, Bhattachayra PK. Flux and retention analysis during micellar enhanced ultra filtration for the removal of phenol and aniline. Sep Purif Technol 2001; 24: 541-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00154-X
[14] Damak K, Ayadi A, Zeghmati B, Schmitz P. A new Navier– Stokes and Darcy’s law combined model for fluid flow in crossflow filtration tubular membranes. Desalination 2004; 161: 67-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(04)90041-0
[15] Ahmed AL, Chong MF, Bhatia S. Ultrafiltation modeling of multiple solutes systems for continuous crossflow process. Chem Eng Sci 2006; 61: 5057-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.03.017
[16] Yeh HM, Cheng TW. Osmotic-pressure model with permeability analysis for ultrafiltration in hollow-fiber membrane modules. Sep Technol 1993; 3: 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0956-9618(93)80008-F
[17] Karode SK. Unsteady state flux response: a method to determine the nature of the solute and gel layer in membrane filtration. J Membr Sci 2001; 188: 9-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00644-X
[18] Blatt WF, Dravid A, Michael AS, Nelsen L. Solute polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration: causes, consequences, and control techniques, in: Flinn JE, Ed. Membrane Science and Technology, Plenum Press, New York 1970; pp. 47-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1851-4_4
[19] Nakao S, Yumoto S, Kimura S. Analysis of rejection characteristics of macromolecular gel layer for low molecular weight solutes in ultrafiltration. J Chem Eng Jpn 1982; 15(6): 463-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1252/jcej.15.463
[20] Yeh HM. Modified gel-polarization model for ultrafiltration in hollow-fiber membrane modules. Sep Sci Technol 1996; 31(2): 201-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01496399608000690
[21] Ahmad AL, Chong MF, Bhatia S. Mathematical modeling and simulation of the multiple solutes system for nanofiltration process. J Membr Sci 2005; 253: 103-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.005
[22] Chapra SC, Canale RP. Numerical Methods for Engineers, McGraw Hill, New York 1998.
Downloads
Published
2013-05-24
How to Cite
Pawar, S., & Marathe, K. V. (2013). Validation of Multiple Solute Model for Application to Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration and Comparison with Modified Resistance in Series Model. Journal of Applied Solution Chemistry and Modeling, 2(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5030.2013.02.02.5
Issue
Section
General Articles
License
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
