Efficacies of PGF2α, Ovsynch, and CIDR Protocols on Synchronization of Estrus in Buffaloes: A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2025.14.15Keywords:
Calving, CIDR, conception, estrus synchronization, GnRH, PGF2αAbstract
The present study aimed to compare the efficacies of PGF2α, GnRH, and CIDR on estrus synchronization of native buffaloes in Bangladesh. A total of 93 buffaloes of second to fifth parity were treated either with PGF2α, Ovsynch, or CIDR protocol. In the PGF2α experiment, buffaloes were treated with either 500 μg (n=20) or 875 μg (n=20) of cloprostenol, and artificial inseminations (AI) were done at 72 hrs after PGF2α injection. In the Ovsynch protocol, buffaloes were treated with 200 μg (n=11) or 350 µg (n=16) of GnRH at day 0, followed by 875 µg of PGF2α at day 7, and again 200 μg or 350 µg of GnRH at day 9, and AI was performed at 16 hrs after the second GnRH administration. In the CIDR protocol, a CIDR implant was placed intravaginally for 12 days with either 500 μg (n=13) or 875 μg (n=13) of cloprostenol at 24 hrs before the removal of the CIDR, and AI was performed at 72 hrs after the removal of the CIDR. The results showed that estrus response and conception rates did not differ significantly between PGF2α and GnRH protocols. Higher doses of PGF2α and GnRH did not result in any significant increase in estrus response in buffaloes. CIDR induced estrus in all buffaloes in both doses of PGF2α. Estrus rate was significantly higher (P=0.035) in buffaloes of the CIDR protocol than in the PGF2α and Ovsynch groups. Conception rates of buffaloes did not differ significantly (P=0.823) among the protocols. The calving rates were higher (P=0.278) in buffaloes synchronized with CIDR than in PGF2α and Ovsynch groups. The costs of materials per buffalo synchronized, conceived, and calved were higher in the CIDR protocol and lower in the PGF2α than in other protocols. However, considering all the expenses and calving rates, costs per buffalo calves were cheaper in the CIDR group with a higher dose of PGF2α. In conclusion, CIDR can be applied to increase the reproductive efficiency of buffaloes.
References
Warriach HM, McGill DM, Bush RD, Wynn PC, Chohan KR. A review of recent developments in buffalo reproduction. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015; 28(3): 451-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0259
Madan ML, Das SK, Palta P. Application of reproductive technology to buffaloes. Anim Reprod Sci 1996; 42(1-4): 299-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(96)01534-5
Singh J, Nanda AS, Adams GP. The reproductive pattern and efficiency of female buffaloes. Anim Reprod Sci 2000; 60-61: 593-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00109-3
Saraswat CS, Purohit GN. Repeat breeding: Incidence, risk factors, and diagnosis in buffaloes. Asian Pac J Reprod 2016; 5(2): 87-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjr.2016.01.001
Singh G, Singh GB, Sharma RD, Nanda AS. Ovulation and fertility after PRID, PRID + GnRH, and GnRH in anestrous buffaloes. Theriogenology 1984; 21(6): 859-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(84)90379-0
Islam R. Synchronization of estrus in cattle: A review. Vet World 2011; 4(3): 136-41. Available from: https://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.4/March%20-%202011/Synchronization%20of%20Estrus%20in%20Cattle.pdf
Kharche SD, Singh N, Goel AK, Jindal SK. Induction of oestrus and fertility following insertion of intravaginal pessaries in anoestrusJamunapari goats. In: Proc. International conference on Biotechnologies for optimization of reproductive efficiency of Farm companion animals to improve global food security and human health, 26th Annual Convention of ISSAR; 2010 Nov 11-12; Pantnagar, India. Pantnagar: GBAUAT; 2010. p.141.
Bachlaus NK, Arora RC, Prasad A, Pandey RS. Plasma levels of gonadal hormones in cycling buffalo heifers. Indian J Exp Biol 1979; 17(8): 823-5. Available from: http://imsear.searo.who.int/handle/123456789/57195
Rowson LE, Tervit R, Brand A. The use of prostaglandins for synchronization of oestrus in cattle. J Reprod Fertil 1972; 29(1): 145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0290145-a
Galina CS, Orihuela A. The detection of estrus in cattle raised under tropical conditions: What we know and what we need to know. Horm Behav 2007; 52(1): 32-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.025
Twagiramungu H, Guilbault LA, Proulx JG, Dufour JJ. Influence of corpus luteum and induced ovulation on ovarian follicular dynamics in postpartum cyclic cows treated with buserelin and cloprostenol. J Anim Sci 1994; 72(7): 1796-805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7271796x
Hansel W, Convey EM. Physiology of the estrous cycle. J Anim Sci 1983; 57(Suppl 2): 404-24. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-abstract/57/suppl_2/404/4665387
Cooper MJ. Control of oestrous cycles of heifers with a synthetic prostaglandin analogue. Vet Rec 1974; 95(10): 200-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.95.10.200
Peters AR, Hewitt DS, Lamming GE. The effect of exogenous progesterone on plasma LH and milk progesterone concentrations in multiple-suckling postpartum cows. Anim Reprod Sci 1983; 6(2): 103-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(83)90014-3
Kerr DR, McGowan MR, Carroll CL, Baldock FC. Evaluation of three estrus synchronization regimens for use in extensively managed Bos indicus and Bos indicus/taurus heifers in Northern Australia. Theriogenology 1991; 36(1): 129-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90442-G
Cavalieri J, Fitzpatrick LA. Oestrus detection techniques and insemination strategies in Bos indicus heifers synchronised with norgestomet-oestradiol. Aust Vet J 1995; 72(5): 177-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1995.tb03507.x
Odde KG. A review of synchronization of estrus in postpartum cattle. J Anim Sci 1990; 68(3): 817-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.683817x
Lamb GC, Nix DW, Stevenson JS, Corah LR. Prolonging the MGA-prostaglandin F2α interval from 17 to 19 days in an estrus synchronization system for heifers. Theriogenology 2000; 53(3): 691-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00267-8
Amaya-Montoya C, Matsui M, Kawashima C, Hayashi KG, Matsuda G, Kaneko E, et al. Induction of ovulation with GnRH and PGF2α at two different stages during the early postpartum period in dairy cows: Ovarian response and changes in hormone concentrations. J Reprod Dev 2007; 53(4): 867-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.18163
Pursley JR, Mee MO, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2α and GnRH. Theriogenology 1995; 44(7): 915-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00279-H
Stevenson JS, Lucy MC, Call EP. Failure of timed inseminations and associated luteal function in dairy cattle after two injections of prostaglandin F2α. Theriogenology 1987; 28(6): 937-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(87)90044-6
Brito LFC, Satrapa R, Marson EP, Kastelic JP. Efficacy of PGF2α to synchronize estrus in water buffalo cows (Bubalus bubalis) is dependent upon plasma progesterone concentration, corpus luteum size, and ovarian follicular status before treatment. Anim Reprod Sci 2002; 73(1-2): 23-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00124-0
Battista PJ, Rexroad CE, Williams WF. Effects of progesterone administered to dairy heifers on the sensitivity of corpora lutea to PGF2α and on plasma LH concentration. Theriogenology 1984; 22(1): 47-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(84)90472-2
Kumar PR, Singh SK, Kharche SD, Govindaraju CS, Behera BK, Shukla SN, et al. Anestrus in cattle and buffalo: Indian perspective. Adv Anim Vet Sci 2014; 2(3): 124-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2014/2.3.124.138
Rhodes FM, McDougall S, Burke CR, Verkerk GA, Macmillan KL. Treatment of cows with an extended postpartum anestrous interval. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86(6): 1876-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73775-8
Neglia G, Gasparrini B, Di Palo R, De Rosa C, Zicarelli L, Campanile G. Comparison of pregnancy rates with two estrus synchronization protocols in Italian Mediterranean buffalo cows. Theriogenology 2003; 60(1): 125-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01328-6
Leitman NR, Busch DC, Wilson DJ, Mallory DA, Ellersieck MR, Smith MF, et al. Comparison of controlled internal drug release insert-based protocols to synchronize estrus in prepubertal and estrous-cycling beef heifers. J Anim Sci 2009; 87(12): 3976-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2250
Wheaton JE, Carlson KM, Windels HF, Johnston LJ. CIDR: A new progesterone-releasing intravaginal device for induction of estrus and cycle control in sheep and goats. Anim Reprod Sci 1993; 33(1-4): 127-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(93)90111-4
Erramoccia S, Bartocci S, Borghese A. Nutritional requirements in buffalo cows and heifers. In: Buffalo production and research. FAO Inter-Regional Cooperative Research Network on Buffalo. REU Technical Series. Rome: FAO; 2005. p.145-60. Available from: https://www.fao.org/4/ah847e/ah847e.pdf#page=150
Roy BC, Moniruzzaman M, Pasha M, Modak A, Alam M, Islam M, et al. PGF2α induced estrus synchronization of native buffaloes in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Anim Sci 2021; 50(2): 80-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v50i2.58134
Pasha MMH, Moniruzzaman M, Islam MN, Alam MH, Das SK. Estrus synchronization of native buffaloes using PGF2α and GnRH-based protocols in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Livest Res 2021; 28(2): 50-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjlr.v28i1.72057
Atabay EC, Atabay E dela P, Maylem ERS, Encarnacion E dela C, Salazar RL. Enhancing prostaglandin-based estrus synchronization protocol for artificial insemination in water buffaloes. Buffalo Bull 2020; 39(1): 53-60. Available from: https://kuojs.lib.ku.ac.th/index.php/BufBu/article/view/1572
Intawicha P, Wichapon J, Klamrak M, Dongpaleethun C, Ju JC. Effects of breeding season and estrus synchronization protocols on the fertility of anestrus swamp buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Livest Sci 2022; 264: 105043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105043
Sanker SS, Kumar DD, Mandal K. Factors influencing the dry period and calving interval in different grades of buffaloes. Buffalo Bull 2014; 33(1): 120-6. Available from: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20153008417
Ahmad N, Arshad U. Synchronization and resynchronization strategies to improve fertility in dairy buffaloes. Theriogenology 2020; 150: 173-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.025
Syaiful FL, Afriani T, Purwati E. Effect of FSH dosage on the number and quality of Pesisir cattle embryos. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2019; 287(1): 012003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/287/1/012003
Bisinotto RS, Lean IJ, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP. Meta-analysis of progesterone supplementation during timed artificial insemination programs in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98(4): 2472-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8954
Van Werven T, Waldeck F, Souza AH, Floch S, Englebienne M. Comparison of two intravaginal progesterone releasing devices (PRID-Delta vs CIDR) in dairy cows: Blood progesterone profile and field fertility. Anim Reprod Sci 2013; 138(3-4): 143-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.02.010
Savio JD, Thatcher WW, Morris GR, Entwistle K, Drost M, Mattiacci MR. Effects of induction of low plasma progesterone concentrations with a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device on follicular turnover and fertility in cattle. Reproduction 1993; 98(1): 77-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0980077
Wittke M, Drillich M, Tenhagen BA, Heuwieser W. Comparison of ovulation synchronization (OVSYNCH) with the selective induction of oestrus using PGF2α after rectal palpation in a dairy herd. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2005; 112(10): 368-74. Available from: https://europepmc.org/article/med/16320570
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work