Quality Improvements in Public Livestock Services Delivery: Are Farmers Ready to Pay? An Inquiry in South India

G. Kathiravan; M. Thirunavukkarasu

doi:10.6000/1927-520X.2013.02.02.1

Authors

G. Kathiravan Department of Animal Husbandry Statistics and Computer Applications, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal – 637 002, India
M. Thirunavukkarasu Department of Animal Husbandry Statistics and Computer Applications, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal – 637 002, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2013.02.02.1

Keywords:

Livestock Services, Willingness To Pay, Contingent Valuation, Animal Health Care, Bovine Breeding, WTP, Veterinary Services, India

Abstract

Farmers Willingness To Pay (WTP) for improving the quality of public livestock services delivery, in terms of Service Provider and Farmer Relationship (SPFR), chance of recovery from ailments and chance of conception following Artificial Insemination (AI), was assessed through Contingent Valuation (CV) in southern peninsular state of India, the Tamil Nadu State. The districts of the state were categorized as ‘Livestock Developed’ (LD) and ‘Livestock Under Developed’ (LUD) based on initial base line developed. Contingent Valuation (CV) approach and Tobit regressions were used to assess variations in the stated Willingness To Pay (WTP) values, and the probability of stating a positive WTP value for respondents who declared that they were not willing to pay. Overall, the respondents in the study area were willing to pay INR 3.91 for improving the SPFR attribute of the public veterinary centre, while they were ready to pay INR 5.84 for augmenting the chances of recovery from illness by the services of public veterinary centres. In order to benefit from improved chance of conception of their bovines after AI, the farmers were willing to pay INR 11.71. An absolute concordance on the levels of attributes and the variations in the stated positive WTP values for quality improvements was noticed. Tobit regression analyses on the improvements of all above attributes indicated that the farmers who were at disadvantaged levels of an attribute were willing to pay more compared to those at an advantaged level.

Author Biographies

G. Kathiravan, Department of Animal Husbandry Statistics and Computer Applications, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal – 637 002, India

Department of Animal Husbandry Statistics and Computer Applications

M. Thirunavukkarasu, Department of Animal Husbandry Statistics and Computer Applications, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal – 637 002, India

Department of Animal Husbandry Statistics and Computer Applications

References

Planning Commision, GOI. Report of the working group on Animal Husbandry and Dairying - 11th five year plan (2007- 12). New Delhi, India, 2007; pp. 232.

Ravishankar A, Birthal PS. The livestock sector in India: A country report with special emphasis on trade with southeast Asian economies. Proceedings of the workshop on the implications of the Asian economic crisis for the livestock industry held in Bangkok on 6-9 July 1999; pp. 213-232.

Ahuja V, George PS, Ray S, McConnell KE, Kurup MPG, Gandhi V, Umali D, Haan C De. Agricultural services and the poor: Case of livestock health and breeding services in India. IIM, Ahmedabad; The World Bank, Washington, DC and Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Bern. 2000; pp. 1-148.

Bhalla GS, Hazell P. Food grains demand in India to 2020: A preliminary exercise. Economic Political Weekly 1997; 32(52): A150-A154.

Kleeman G. Responses of the livestock services delivery and its management to the Asian economic crisis. Proceedings of the workshop on the implications of the Asian economic crisis for the livestock industry held in Bangkok on 6–9 July 1999. Organised by FAO, UN.

Leonard DK. Structural reform of the veterinary profession in Africa and the new institutional economics. Dev Change 1993; 24: 227-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1993.tb00485.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1993.tb00485.x

Jothilakshmi M, Thirunavukkarasu D, Sudeepkumar NK. Structural changes in livestock service delivery system: A case study of India. Asian J Agric Res 2011: 5; 98-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajar.2011.98.108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajar.2011.98.108

Tobin J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 1958; 26: 24-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1907382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382

Donaldson C, Jones AM, Mapp TJ, Olson JA. Limited dependent variables in willingness to pay studies: Applications in health care. Appl Econom 1998; 30(5): 667-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/000368498325651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/000368498325651

Mataria A, Donaldson C, Luchini S, Moatti JP. A stated preference approach to assessing health care-quality improvements in Palestine: From theoretical validity to policy implications. J Health Econom 2004; 23: 1285-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.05.001

Cameron TA, Huppert DD. OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. J Environm Econom Manag 1989; 17: 230-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(89)90018-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(89)90018-1

Whitehead JC, Hoban TJ, Clifford WB. Measurement issues with interested, continuous/interval contingent valuation data. J Environm Manag 1995; 43: 129-39; 151-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(95)90112-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(95)90112-4

Johnson KB, Brown JG, Whitehead CJ. Estimation of the value of public goods generated by improved sport stadiums and arenas using the contingent valuation method. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Economic Association in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, June 28-July 2, 1998.

Ghorbani M, Hamraz S. A Survey on factors affecting on consumer’s potential willingness to pay for organic products in Iran (A case study). Trends Agric Econom 2009; 2: 10-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/tae.2009.10.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/tae.2009.10.16

Ramsey JB. Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis. J Royal Statis Soc Ser B 1969; 31: 350-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1969.tb00796.x