Hemodynamic Changes with Different Non-Invasive Respiratory Modes for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Tayseer Mostafa Gad Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Safaa Shafik Imam Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Rania Ali El-Farrash Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Rania I.H. Ismail Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Esraa Matarawy Eid Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Nora El Samman Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4247.2025.14.02.03

Keywords:

Hemodynamic, non-invasive respiratory modes, primary respiratory support, preterm neonates

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive ventilation has improved the survival rate and treatment outcomes for preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The hemodynamic changes that occur, particularly during the weaning period, and alternate non-invasive breathing strategies are not well understood.

Aim: To assess the hemodynamic changes that occur during and after non-invasive respiratory support and the comparative efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) as the primary non-invasive respiratory support for preterm neonates.

Methods: A randomized controlled study on 90 preterm neonates with RDS in need of non-invasive ventilation during their first 3 days of life, randomized into 3 groups: NHFOV, vapotherm, and NCPAP groups; 30 neonates for each group. Hemodynamic changes were assessed by echocardiography, pelviabdominal, and transcranial ultrasounds during and after discontinuation of the device.

Results: The NHFOV group had the lowest failure rate compared to the other two groups (p < 0.05). The Vapotherm group had a considerably shorter hospital stay and duration on non-invasive ventilation, faster reach to full enteral feeding, and lower nose trauma score (p < 0.05 for all). In terms of hemodynamic changes, the NCPAP group experienced a considerably higher percentage increase in left ventricular output (LVO) compared to the other two modalities (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: NHFOV had the lowest failure rate as a primary non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants with RDS. However, the Vapotherm group showed a shorter hospital stay and duration on non-invasive respiratory support, quicker time to reach full oral feeding, and lower nasal trauma. The NCPAP group had a higher percentage of increment in LVO.

References

Permall DL, Pasha AB, Chen XQ. Current insights in non-invasive ventilation for the treatment of neonatal respiratory disease. Ital J Pediatr 2019; 45(1).

Mahmoud RA, Roehr CC, Schmalisch G. Current methods of non-invasive ventilatory support for neonates. Paediatr Respir Rev 2011; 12(3): 196-205.

Rüegger CM, Lorenz L, Kamlin CFO, Manley BJ, Owen LS, Bassler D, et al. The effect of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on desaturations and bradycardia in very preterm infants: a randomized cross-over trial. J Pediatr 2018.

Price AM, Plowright C, Makowski A, Misztal B. Using a high-flow respiratory system (Vapotherm®) within a high dependency setting. Available from: www.inspiration-healthcare.co.uk.

Corp A, Thomas C, Adlam M. The cardiovascular effects of positive pressure ventilation. BJA Educ 2021; 21(6): 202-9.

Fiorenzano DM, Leal GN, Sawamura KSS, Lianza AC, Carvalho WB, Krebs VLJ. Síndrome do desconforto respiratório: influência do manejo sobre o estado hemodinâmico de recém-nascidos pré-termo ≤ 32 semanas nas primeiras 24 horas de vida. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2019; 31(3): 312-7.

Yadav S, Lee B, Kamity R. Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. [Updated 2021 Jul 31]. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing.

Seth S, Saha B, Saha AK, Mukherjee S, Hazra A. Nasal HFOV versus nasal IPPV as a post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants—a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr 2021; 180(10): 3151-60.

Yoder BA, Manley B, Collins C, Ives K, Kugelman A, Lavizzari A, et al. Consensus approach to nasal high-flow therapy in neonates. J Perinatol 2017; 37(7): 809-13.

Todd DA, Wright A, Broom M, Chauhan M, Meskell S, Cameron C, et al. Methods of weaning preterm babies < 30 weeks gestation off CPAP: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97(4): F236-40.

Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. Current literature-supported neonatal assessment. Public Health Serv Grants MCH. Available from: www.nih.gov.

Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Anesth Analg 2015; 120(5): 1056-9.

Silverman WC, Anderson DH. Controlled clinical trial on effects of water mist on obstructive respiratory signs, death rate, and necropsy findings among premature infants. Pediatrics 1956; 17: 1-4.

Rawat M, Chandrasekharan PK, Williams A, Gugino S, Koenigsknecht C, Swartz D, et al. Oxygen saturation index and severity of hypoxic respiratory failure. Neonatology 2015; 107(3): 161-6.

Fischer C, Bertelle V, Hohlfeld J, Forcada-Guex M, Stadelmann-Diaw C, Tolsa JF. Nasal trauma due to continuous positive airway pressure in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95(6).

Paetzel M. Respiratory distress syndrome (grade 1-4) of the premature and newborn (IRDS). Ped Rad [serial online]. Vol 2, No. 11. Available from: www.PedRad.info/?search= 20021110223558. Accessed June 25, 2020.

Allison JW, Faddis LA, Kinder DL, Roberson PK, Glasier CM, Seibert JJ. Intracranial resistive index (RI) values in normal-term infants during the first day of life. Pediatr Radiol 2000; 30: 618-20.

Havranek T, Madramootoo C, Carver JD. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure affects pre- and postprandial intestinal blood flow velocity in preterm infants. J Perinatol 2007; 27(11): 704-8.

Sahn DJ, Demaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circ. Available from: http://circ.ahajournals.org/.

Miletin J, Stranak Z, Ó Catháin N, Janota J, Semberova J. Comparison of two techniques of superior vena cava flow measurement in preterm infants with birth weight <1,250 g in the transitional period—prospective observational cohort study. Front Pediatr 2021; 9.

Mertens L, Seri I, Marek J, Arlettaz R, Barker P, McNamara P, et al. Targeted neonatal echocardiography in the neonatal intensive care unit: practice guidelines and recommendations for training. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24(10): 1057-78.

Abdel-Hady H, Matter M, Hammad A, El-Refaay A, Aly H. Hemodynamic changes during weaning from nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics 2008; 122(5).

Sweet DG, Carnielli VP, Greisen G, Hallman M, Klebermass-Schrehof K, Ozek E, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome: 2022 update. Neonatology 2023; 120(1): 3-23.

Kugelman A, Riskin A, Said W, Shoris I, Mor F, Bader D. A randomized pilot study comparing heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with NIPPV for RDS. Pediatr Pulmonol 2015; 50(6): 576-83.

Iranpour R, Armanian AM, Abedi AR, Farajzadegan Z. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) as an initial therapy for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm and near-term infants. BMJ Paediatr Open 2019; 3(1).

De Waal KA, Evans N, Osborn DA, Kluckow M. Cardiorespiratory effects of changes in end expiratory pressure in ventilated newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92(6).

Zhou H, Hou X, Cheng R, Zhao Y, Qiu J. Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on cerebral hemodynamics in preterm infants. Front Pediatr 2020; 8.

Renesme L, Dumas de la Roque E, Germain C, Chevrier A, Rebola M, Cramaregeas S, et al. Nasal high-frequency percussive ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure in newborn infants respiratory distress: A cross-over clinical trial. Pediatr Pulmonol 2020; 55(10): 2617-23.

Gharib A. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on the respiratory system: a comprehensive review. Egypt J Bronchol 2023; 17(1).

Lavizzari A, Colnaghi M, Ciuffini F, Veneroni C, Musumeci S, Cortinovis I, et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity: A randomized clinical noninferiority trial. JAMA Pediatr 2016.

Collins CL, Holberton JR, Barfield C, Davis PG. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure post-extubation in premature infants. J Pediatr 2013; 162(5).

Malakian A, Bashirnezhadkhabaz S, Aramesh MR, Dehdashtian M. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33(15): 2601-7.

Zhu X, Feng Z, Liu C, Shi L, Shi Y, Ramanathan R. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with moderate respiratory distress syndrome: A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Neonatology 2021; 118(3): 325-31.

Li Y, Zhu X, Shi Y. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in extremely preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled, superiority trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13(3).

Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O’Donnell CPF, De Paoli AG, Manley BJ. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016(2).

Published

2025-05-16

How to Cite

Gad, T. M. ., Imam, S. S. ., El-Farrash, R. A. ., Ismail, R. I. ., Eid, E. M. ., & El Samman, N. . (2025). Hemodynamic Changes with Different Non-Invasive Respiratory Modes for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition, 14(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4247.2025.14.02.03

Issue

Section

General Articles