Assessing the Effectiveness of Compliance Programs Through the Use of the Metaverse and Blockchain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2025.14.09Keywords:
Regulatory arbitrage, criminogenic asymmetries, cross-border opacity), blockchain solutions, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), algorithmic governance, compliance automation, Metaverse compliance testing, behavioral analytics), Global Anomie, deregulation, virtual economies), , AI-Driven ComplianceAbstract
This paper examines how blockchain technology and the Metaverse can address persistent challenges in corporate compliance, with a focus on mitigating criminogenic asymmetries—such as regulatory arbitrage and opacity in cross-border transactions—through decentralized, transparent solutions. By contrasting the U.S. and Italian legal frameworks, we highlight the limitations of retrospective compliance evaluations and propose blockchain-enabled innovations, including immutable audit trails, smart contracts for automated enforcement, and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) to decentralize governance and embed compliance into protocol design. The Metaverse offers a simulated environment for stress-testing compliance protocols against emerging risks, while criminological theories (e.g., global anomie, legal-illegal interfaces) contextualize regulatory gaps in digital economies. We argue that DAOs, as digital-native entities, could revolutionize compliance by replacing hierarchical oversight with algorithmic governance, though challenges like jurisdictional fragmentation and identity verification persist. The study underscores the need for adaptive regulatory frameworks to harness these technologies while balancing transparency, accountability, and privacy.
References
Burchard, C. 2020. The “Criminal Law” of predictive society… or how “smart” algorithms (could) change the administration of criminal justice. Law and Order (1): 1-5.
Campbell-Verduyn, M. 2018. Bitcoin, crypto-coins, and global anti-money laundering governance. Crime, Law and Social Change 69(2): 283-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9756-5
Casino F., Dasaklis T. K., & Patsakis C. 2019. A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification, and open issues. Telematics and Informatics 36: 55-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006
Cong L. W., & He Z. 2019. Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. The Review of Financial Studies 32(5): 1754-1797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz007
Coffee, J. C. Jr. 1990. “Carrot and Stick” Sentencing: Structuring Incentives for Organizational Defendants. Fed. Sent. Rep. (3): 126-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20639307
Coppola, F. 2022. “Digital Compliance and Crime-Prevention: How AI and Metaverse May Improve the Effectiveness of Compliance Programs”. Iura and Legal Systems (4): 98-102.
Davidson S., De Filippi P., & Potts J. 2018. “Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism”. Journal of Institutional Economics 14(4): 639-658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000200
Davidson S., De Filippi P., & Potts J. 2022. “The economics of NFTs and the regulatory challenges of virtual assets”. Journal of Financial Regulation 8(1): 77-102.
De Filippi P., & Wright A. 2020. Blockchain and the law: The rule of code: Harvard University Press.
De Vita, V. 2023. “Salerno, processo MetaCourt: la prima simulazione di un dibattimento penale all'Università”, Il Mattino, November 29, p.1.
Dolliver D., & Love K. 2015. “Criminogenic Asymmetries in Cyberspace: A Comparative Analysis of Two Tor Marketplaces”. Journal of Globalization Studies 5(2): 75–96.
Fang F., Liu M., & Wong W. K. 2023. “Anti-money laundering in the age of cryptocurrencies: A review of blockchain-based compliance solutions”. Journal of Financial Crime 30(1): 102-118.
Fiorella A. 2016. “Dogmatica e responsabilità ex crimine delle persone giuridiche”. Riv. Trim. Dir. Pen. Econ. 3-4: 633-649.
Foley S., Karlsen J. R., & Putniņš T. J. 2019. “Sex, drugs, and bitcoin: How much illegal activity is financed through cryptocurrencies?” The Review of Financial Studies 32(5):1798-1853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz015
Forti G. 2012. “Uno sguardo ai “piani nobili” del d.lgs. n. 231/2001”. Riv. It. Dir. Proc. Pen. 2:1249-1298.
Gargani A. 2002. “Imputazione del reato agli enti collettivi e responsabilità penale dell’intraneo: due piani irrelati?”. Diritto penale e processo 9: 1061-1069.
Gullo A. 2023. Compliance. Archivio penale 1: 1-17.
Manes V. 2021. “Realismo e concretezza nell’accertamento dell’idoneità del modello”. Giurisprudenza commerciale 4: 633-661.
Mongillo V. 2011. “Il giudizio di idoenità del Modello di Organizzazione ex d.lgs. 231/2001: incertezza dei parametri di riferimento e prospettive di soluzione”. La responsabilità amministrativa delle società e degli enti 3: 69-100.
Mongillo V. 2023. “La colpa di organizzazione: enigma ed essenza della responsabilità “da reato” dell’ente collettivo”. Cassazione penale 3: 704-736.
Mongillo V. 2022. “Presente e future della compliance penale”. Sistema penale: 1-21.
Morgente G., & Fiorinelli G. 2022. “Promesse e rischi della compliance penale digitalizzata”. Archivio penale 2: 1-41.
Narayanan A., Bonneau J., Felten E., Miller A., & Goldfeder S. 2022. Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: Princeton University Press.
Nisco A. 2022. “Riflessi della compliance digitale in ambito 231”. Sistema penale: 1-12.
Kawarase M. A. 4th, & Anjankar A. 2022. “Dynamics of Metaverse and Medicine: A Review Article”. Cureus 14 (11): 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31232
Paliero C. E., & Piergallini C. 2006. “La colpa di organizzazione”. Responsabilità amministrativa società enti 3: 167-184.
Pantaleo D. 2024. Metaverso e diritto penale: Pacini Giuridica.
Passas N. 1999. “Globalization, criminogenic asymmetries and economic crime”. European Journal of Law Reform 1(4): 399-423.
Passas N. 2000. “Global anomie, dysnomie, and economic crime: Hidden consequences of neoliberalism and globalization in Russia and around the world”. Social Justice 27(2): 16-44.
Passas N. 2003. “Cross-border crime and the interface between legal and illegal actors”. Security Journal 16(1): 19-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.sj.8340123
Passas N. 2005. “Global Anomie Theory and Crime”. Pp. 174-182 In The Essential Criminology Reader edited by S. Henry & M. Lanier. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429496592-22
Passas N. 2005. “Lawful but awful: ‘Legal Corporate Crimes’”. The Journal of Socio-Economics 34(6): 771-786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.07.024
Passas N. 2016. “Legal Crimes - Lawful but Awful”. Pp. 125-127 in A Companion to Crime, Harm and Victimisation edited by K. Corteen, S. Morley, P. Taylor, & J. Turner. Bristol: Policy Press.
Reijers W., O’Dwyer R., & Bodo B. 2023. “The governance of blockchain-based organizations: A socio-legal perspective”. New Media & Society 25(2): 342-361.
Savelyev A. 2017. “Contract law 2.0: ‘Smart’ contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law”. Information & Communications Technology Law 27(1): 85-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2885241
Thiel S. 2011. “Global Anomie and India: A Conceptual Approach”. Indian Journal of Asian Affairs 24(1/2): 17-34.
Twyman-Ghoshal A. 2021. “Global Anomie Theory”. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.545
Wright A., & De Filippi P. 2015. “Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia”. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580664
Wright A., & De Filippi P. 2022. “Decentralized blockchain-based organizations and the law”. Computer Law & Security Review 38: 105655.
Zhao, Y., Chen, L., & Xu, X. 2022. “The impact of blockchain on regulatory compliance: Challenges and opportunities”. Journal of Business Ethics 179(3): 593-614.
Zohar A. 2015. “Bitcoin: under the hood”. Communications of the ACM 58(9): 104-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2701411
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
