Public Interest in Private Law Relations of Transition Democracies: A Modern View from the Standpoint of a Systemic Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.51Abstract
The study investigates the legal nature of the category of "public interest" in private law relations from the standpoint of a systematic scientific approach to law in the countries of post-Soviet society in the modern period. The study states the affiliation of public and private law to the means of achieving the purpose of the law: the recognition of a person, their rights and freedoms as the highest social value of the state. The unsuitability of the theory of the branch belonging to public law has been proved using the universal criterion of separation: the use of the category of "public interest" in the development of the subject and method of the branch in private legal relations. It is concluded that the division of law into private and public is inconsistent in terms of their differentiation of the criterion "method of protecting the rights of their participants", which is activated only after the violation of the latter, while subjective law also exists before the violation, during the existence of regulatory legal relations, and it is the subjective law that forms the affiliation to the relevant industry. During the study, signs of public interest as a legal category were formed. In addition, modern features of public interest as a legal category were outlined from the standpoint of a systematic approach: the general nature of public interests; connectedness with large-scale involvement; recognition by the state and the provision of the law; the possibility of their implementation through measures of state power.
References
Abolonin, Gleb. 2001. “Problems of accessibility and efficiency of justice on the example of the rights and interests of numerous groups of persons”. Arbitration and Civil Procedure 4: 2-9.
Alekseev, Sergei. 1999. Private law. Moscow: Statut.
Andrushko, Iryna. 2011. “The category of "public interest" in constitutional law: concept and content”. Magazine of Kyiv University of Law 4: 137-141.
Azimov, Chynhizkhan. 1998. “Concept and content of private law”. Bulletin of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 3(14): 15-58.
Bakaeva, Olga. 2010. The ratio of private and public interests in the context of reforming the legislation of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Yurlitinforma.
Blauberg, Igor, Vadim Sadovskiy and Erik Yudin. 1970. System approach in modern science. Problems of system research methodology. Мoscow: Mysl.
Braginsky, Mikhail. 2000. About the place of civil law in the system “public law – private law”. Мoscow: Norma.
Dankov, Anton. 2014. Ensuring the balance of public and private interests in the sphere of justice. Мoscow: Russian Academy of Justice.
Frenzel, Max. 1978. The public interest as a prerequisite for expropriation. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Haivoronskyi, Volodymyr. 1997. “Civil law: from "nothing private" to "nothing public". Bulletin of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 4: 91-100.
Ilyina, Olga. 2007. Private and public interests in family law of the Russian Federation. Мoscow: RSL.
Khanipov, Anton. 1987. Interests as a form of public relations. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
Kharytonov Yevhen. 2000. History of private law in Europe: Eastern tradition. Odessa: Yurydychna Literatura. 262 p.
Kharytonov, Yevhen and Olena Kharytonova. 2000. “On the concept of the meaning of the dichotomy "private law – public law". Bulletin of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 2(21): 83-89.
Kipnis, Nikolai. 2004. In defense of public interests. Moscow: Yurist.
Kolodii, Anatoliy. 1997. Principles of law of Ukraine. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Kostin, Andrey. 2002. “Interest of public-territorial entities in civil law”. Legislation 3: 13-19.
Kruss, Vladimir. 2007. The theory of constitutional legal use. Moscow: Norma.
Kryazhkov, Aleksandr. 1999. “Public interest: concept, types, and protection”. State and Law 10: 91-99.
Kubko, Andriy. 2012. Realisation of public interests in civil law of Ukraine. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
Kuszhanova, Azhar. 2000. “Problems of classification and interaction of interests”. Credo 5. Retrieved October 08, 2020 (http://credonew.ru/content/view/195/25).
Lock, John. 1960. Selected philosophical works. Moscow: Mysl.
Malko, Aleksandr and Vitaliy Subochev. 2004. Legitimate interests as a legal category. St. Petersburg: Juridicheskii Centr Press.
Mikhailov, Sergei. 2002. Category of interest in Russian civil law. Moscow: Statut.
Mikhailov, Stanislav. 1999. “Interest as a general scientific category and its reflection in the science of civil law”. State and Law 7: 86-92.
Muromtsev, Serhiy. 2004. Definition and basic division of law. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University.
Nersesyants, Vladik. 2001. Philosophy of law: textbook. Moscow: Norma.
Neznamov, Aleksandr. 2009. “Some aspects of the development of public interest law in Russia”. Arbitration and Civil Procedure 6: 2-4.
Obrazhiev, Konstantin. 2012. “Systematic approach in jurisprudence: theoretical and methodological foundations”. Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin 2(1): 89-96.
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. 1883. Retrieved October 10, 2020 (http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_123)
Pereterskiy, Ivan. 1924. “Compulsory and dispositive norms in the law of obligations of the Civil Code”. Soviet Law 4: 68-80.
Pervomaisky, Oleh. 2014. “The concept of interest in civil law and legislation”. Legal Ukraine 11: 53-47.
Pokrovsky, Iosif. 1998. Basic problems of civil law. Moscow: Statut.
Prangishvili, Iveri. 2000. System approach and general system laws. Мoscow: Sinteg.
Rabinovych, Petro. 2004. “Natural law: the dialectic of private and public”. Law of Ukraine 9: 61-64.
Rabinovych, Petro. 2004. “Private and public in natural law and Ukrainian legislation”. Legal Ukraine 6: 27-34.
Savchyn, Mykhailo. 2009. Constitutionalism and the nature of the Constitution. Uzhhorod: Lira.
Selivanov, Volodymyr. 2001. “Private legal principles of development of domestic legal science”. Law of Ukraine 3: 21-32.
Sheindlin, Boris. 1959. The essence of Soviet law. Leningrad: Publishing House of Leningrad State University.
Simon, Valter. 1979. Omnipotence of the unions of entrepreneurs. Alliances in the economic and political system of the FRG. Moscow: Progress.
Solodovnichenko, Tatiana. 2015. “Criteria for differentiating the right to private and public”. Omsk University Bulletin 2(43): 42-46.
Spasibo-Fateeva, Inna. 2011. Kharkiv civil school: in the spirit of traditions. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Stefanchuk, Maryna. 2016. The activity of the prosecutor's office to represent the interests of a citizen or the state in court: problems of theory and practice. Kyiv: In Jure.
Stepanenko, Tetiana. 2008. Judicial proceedings in cases of claims for protection of the rights and interests of an indefinite number of persons. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs.
Sybiliov, Mykhailo. 1998. The role of the Constitution of Ukraine in the formation of the system of law and codification of legislation. In: Theoretical and Practical Issues of Implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine: Problems, Experience, Prospects (pp. 154-156). Kharkiv: Pravo.
Talapina, Elvira and Yuriy Tihomirov. 2002. “Public functions in the economy”. Law and Economics 6: 3-9.
Tikhomirov, Yuriy. 1995. Public law. Moscow: Norma.
Tikhomirov, Yuriy. 2001. “Public law regulation: dynamics of spheres and methods”. Journal of Russian Law 5: 3-12.
Totev, Konstantin. 2002. “Public interest in legal doctrine and legislation”. State and Law 9: 16-17.
Tumanov, Dmitriy. 2012. “Problems of public interest protection in the Russian civil process”. Russian Laws: Experience, Analysis, Practice 9: 3-11.
Uksusova, Elena. 1997. “Cases on the protection of the rights of an indefinite circle of persons”. Russian Justice 11: 42-44.
Vasilyeva, Maria. 2003. Public interests in environmental law. Мoscow: MSU.
Venediktova, Iryna. 2014. Protection of legally protected interests in civil law. Кyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Vinnyk, Oksana, 2004. Theoretical aspects of legal support of realisation of public and private interests in economic societies. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs.
Vinnyk, Oksana. 2001. “Private and public interests, their role and reflection in economic law”. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law 5: 11-13.
Yatsenko, Tatiana. 2016. Civil-legal protection of public interests. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Zabluk, Nikolai. 2002. “Public interest in the context of American pluralistic democracy”. USA and Canada: Economy, Politics, Culture 12: 7-10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
