Social Protests in 2011: International Perspective and Information Access

Authors

  • Lilia E. Ilikova Kazan Federal University, Russia
  • Anna Svirina Kazan National Research Technical University, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.107

Keywords:

Communication, information accessibility, Arab spring, social protests, Internet, social networking, Central Asia.

Abstract

The paper analyzes the interrelation of social protesting and informal economy, core values of protesting class and the level of information accessibility for the ones involved in social unease. To perform this analysis we have used both quantitative and qualitative data: qualitative data was related to the core values of protestants and was collected via semantic analysis of their social media posts. To perform quantitative evaluation, we have used the rankings on Internet freedom and mass media transparency; yet as the main analytical tool was semantic, the conclusion on how core values influence person’s desire to be involved in social protests was made on the basis of qualitative analysis. The research had confirmed that growth rate of informal economy is a good predictor of possible unease based on dignity-based values.

References

Barrett R.(1997). Building a values-driven organization. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Burakova L.A.( 2011). Why Did Georgia Succeed. Alpina Business Books,. (in Russian).

Castells, M., & Portes, A. (1989). World underneath: The origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy. The informal economy: Studies in advanced and less developed countries, 12.

Heathershaw, J., & Megoran, N. (2011). Contesting danger: a new agenda for policy and scholarship on Central Asia. International Affairs, 87(3), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00992.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00992.x

Krstic G., Sanfey P.( 2006). Mobility, Poverty and Well-Being Among Informally Employed in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2007.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2007.06.004

Levitt S., Dubner S.(2010). Superfreakonomics. Moscow: Ivanov, Mann and Faber.

North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. Norton.

Schneider, F. (2002). Size and measurement of the informal economy in 110 countries. In Workshop of Australian National Tax Centre, ANU, Canberra.

Soto, H. (1989). The Other Path: The Economic Answer to Terrorism. Nueva York.

Stavytskyi, V. (2011). Informal Economy and the SLIP Agenda in Russia and Hungary. Unpublished Master of Arts Thesis.

Takim A.(2011). Effectiveness of The Informal Economy in Turkey. European Journal of Social Sciences.

The Informal Sector and The State: Institutions, Inequality and Social Norms, 2011. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLAC/ Resources/CH8.pdf. Retrieved on 28.12.2011.

The Informal Sector: What Is It, Why Do We Care, and How Do We Measure It. 2011, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLAC/Resources/CH1.pdf. Retrieved on 28.12.2011.

The Urban Informal Sector in China, 2011 http://wenku.baidu.com/ view/d82dc0f90242a8956bece404.html. Retrieve on 30.12.2011.

Tunyan B. (2005). The Shadow Economy in Armenia: Size, Causes and Consequences. Armenian International Policy Research Group Working Paper.

Vaillant, J., Grimm, M., Lay, J., & Roubaud, F. (2011). Informal sector dynamics in times of fragile growth: the case of Madagascar. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/26798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/26798

Verick S. (2005). The Impact of Globalization on the Informal Sector of Africa. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.

Vuletin G. (2008). Measuring the Informal Economy in Latin America and the Caribbean. International Monetary Fund Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451869637.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1153724

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

E. Ilikova, L. ., & Svirina, A. . (2022). Social Protests in 2011: International Perspective and Information Access. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 994–999. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.107

Issue

Section

Conference Proceeding Articles 2020