Ethical and Legal Issues of Interaction between a Defence Lawyer and a Prosecutor during the Criminal Trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.167Keywords:
Trial, procedural, defence, evidence.Abstract
The institutions of the prosecution and defence are recognised as equitable related institutions that facilitate the activities of the judiciary. The consolidation of the new status of the institution of defence in the judicial system necessitates the study of new forms of communication between the defence and the court, the principles of such interaction, including the consideration of international standards and European experience. The novelty of the study is determined by the fact that interaction between a defence lawyer and a prosecutor can only be within the framework of a court session and any exchange of information can be performed only if full publicity is achieved in the process of interaction between a defence lawyer and a prosecutor. The authors show that interaction is carried out through a judge and is completely personalised. Accordingly, the interaction should be implemented to influence the judge in the process of forming and passing an appropriate judgement. The authors determine that the such a judgement can be formed in the course of communication and the provision of certain arguments that a defence lawyer cannot communicate in advance and which can only be voiced during a court session. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of innovating the activities of a defence lawyer and increasing the appropriate level of perception on the part of the judge and, accordingly, the prosecutor as representatives of the institutions of justice.
References
Ashikbayeva, Asem, Nazira Gumar, and Gaukhar Zhanibekova. 2018. “Setting Up Individual Indicators of Economic Efficiency for Environmental Protection in Oil Refineries”. Espacios 39(18): 1-9.
Bakashbayev, Azatbek, Aliya Nurgaliyeva, Nazira Gumar, Zhanat Khamidullina, and Markhabat Saduakassova. 2020. “Examining the Trends in Bank Deposits Through Internal and External Factors Based on the Supply Chain Strategies: A Primary and Secondary Data Survey”. International Journal of Supply Chain Management 9(2): 526-536.
Bielen, Samantha and Wim Marneffe. 2018. “Testing the Lawyer-induced Litigation Hypothesis in Europe”. Applied Economics 50(16): 1837-1851. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1374544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1374544
Ermilova, Maria. 2019. “Introduction of Mechanisms and Instruments of Foreign Systems of Housing Market Financing in Russian Practice”. Test Engineering and Management 81: 4286-4297.
Ivanytskyy, Sergiy. 2017. Theoretical Foundations of the Organization of Advocacy in Ukraine: Principles and System. Kyiv: Interservis.
Jaksybekova, Galiya, Aliya Nurgaliyeva, Azhar Nurmagambetova, Nazira Gumar, and Altynai Asanova. 2018. “Liquidity Risk Evaluation”. Espacios 39(16): 1-18.
Kogamov, Akbar. 2013. “Juridical Personality of a Defense Lawyer in the Context of International Contractual and Other Obligations of the Republic of Kazakhstan in Criminal Practice”. World Applied Sciences Journal 26(8): 1094-1099.
Langer, Maximo. 2007. “Revolution in Latin American Criminal Procedure: Diffusion of Legal Ideas from the Periphery”. American Journal of Comparative Law 55(4): 617-676. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/55.4.617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/55.4.617
Liang, Bin and Ni. He. 2014. “Criminal Defense in Chinese Courtrooms: An Empirical Inquiry”. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 58(10): 1230-1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13493077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13493077
Liang, Bin, Ni He and Hong Lu. 2014. “The Deep Divide in China’s Criminal Justice System: Contrasting Perceptions of Lawyers and the Iron Triangle”. Crime, Law and Social Change 62(5): 585-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-014-9545-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-014-9545-3
Liu, Sida and Terence Halliday. 2009. “Recursivity in Legal Change: Lawyers and Reforms of China’s Criminal Procedure Law”. Law and Social Inquiry 34(4): 911-950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01169.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01169.x
Seisenbayeva, Aizada, Nazira Gumar, Munira Imramziyeva, Sanimkul Lapbayeva, and Nurgul Shmanova. 2020. “Towards Sustainable Development Via Enhancing Viability of Small Businesses Through Lending: A Case Study”. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 9(3): 943-950. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2020.9.3(19) DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2020.9.3(19)
Seroussi, Julien. 2018. “How Do International Lawyers Handle Facts? The Role of Folk Sociological Theories at the International Criminal Court”. British Journal of Sociology 69(4): 962-983. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12604
Shytov, Alexander and Peter Duff. 2019. “Truth and Procedural Fairness in Chinese Criminal Procedure Law”. International Journal of Evidence and Proof 23(3): 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712719830704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712719830704
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
