Creativity of High School Teachers Over Time

Leonid N.  Kharchenko; Kazbek S.  Aybatirov; Muslimat A.  Aybatirova; Viktoria E.  Gladchenko; Natalja N.  Kharlanova

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.276

Authors

Leonid N. Kharchenko Department of General Biology and Biodiversity, North-Caucasian Federal University, Pushkin Street, 1, Stavropol, 355009, Russia
Kazbek S. Aybatirov Department of Technical Operation of Cars, Dagestan State Agrarian University, Makhatchkala, M. Gadzhieva, 180, 367032, Russia
Muslimat A. Aybatirova Foreign Languages Department, Dagestan State Agrarian University, Makhatchkala, M. Gadzhieva, 180, 367032, Russia
Viktoria E. Gladchenko Department of Theory, History of Pedagogy and Educational Practice, Armavir State Pedagogical University, Armavir city, Rosa Luxemburg street, 159, 352901, Russia
Natalja N. Kharlanova Department of Pedagogy and Technology of Preschool and Primary Education, Armavir State Pedagogical University, Armavir city, Rosa Luxemburg street, 159, 352901, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.276

Keywords:

High school teacher, creativity, biological creativity, active thesaurus, creative efficiency.

Abstract

This article deals with the creativity of teachers of higher education in the process of their professional activity. The teacher's creativity is substantiated as an important factor that determines the success of the teacher's professional activity and, as a consequence, a better educational process. An active professional thesaurus of a teacher is considered as a means of supporting indicators of changes in biological creativity. The data were obtained from direct surveys of teachers, administrators and managers of universities, using D. Johnson's creativity questionnaire, adapted by E.V. Tunik, as well as from the review of the results of scientific and pedagogical activities of university teachers: original articles, creative classes, and translation of creative behavior. Based on the data of the study, the dependence of the level of creativity of a higher education teacher on the level of a professional thesaurus is revealed. In particular, the article presents the level of creativity of teachers who combine educational work with research, teachers who are mainly engaged in educational activities and representatives of the administrative and managerial personnel of universities, combining managerial functions with teaching.

References

Aibatyrov K.S., Kharchenko L.N. (2014). Modeling a lesson with students focused on the formation of creativity. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University. No. 4 (89). - P. 76-80.

Aibatyrov K.S., Kharchenko L.N. (2016). Professionally oriented creativity: the phenomenon and methods of formation. Stavropol: Publishing house of SKFU, 178 p.

Aleinikov, A.G. (1990). Creative Pedagogy and Creative MetaPedagogy, The Progress of Education. Vol. LXV. – No. 12. – Р. 274-280.

Berezina T.N. (2008). Intelligence and creativity / T.N. Berezina // Edip, No. 3. - P. 92-101.

Bogomolova M.V. (2008). The influence of a rich educational environment on the development of intelligence and creativity. Author’s abstract, Cand. psychol.: 19.00.01. - M., 179 p.

Borlakova S.A., Klushina N.P., Klushina E.A., Kotov S.V., Petrova N.P., Pivnenko P.P., Kharchenko L.N. (2018). Philosophical-anthropological view on higher education teacher professionalism and creativity / Opcion. Ano 34, Especial №.15. – 681-705 р.

Bos E. (2008). How to develop creativity / E. Bos. - Rostov-On-Don: Fenix, 192 p.

Florida R. (2010). How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life / R. Florida? – Vintage Canada.

Kharchenko L.N. (2014). Lecturer of a modern university: a competency model. Direct Media Publishing House, 217 p.

Kharchenko L.N., Panova I.E. (2009). Creative individuality as a manifestation of the personality in a person and an integrative-innovative being in a specialist. Bulletin of State University of Management. No. 12. - P. 83-87.

Knowles, M.S. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education from Pedagogy to Andragogy. Chicago, 273 p.

Morozov. A.V., Chernilevskii D.V. (2004). Creative pedagogy and psychology: Academic project . 560 p.

Pergun O.V., Kharchenko L.N. (2018). Professional activity of a higher school teacher as an object of monitoring. The World of Science. V. 6. - No. 6. - P. 53.

Petrova N.P., Mareev V.I., Pivnenko P.P., Kotov S.V., Kotova S.N., Kharchenko L.N., Gulyakin D.V. (2016). The Higher School Teacher Matrix of Competences / The Social Science. Т. 11. – № 15. – С. 4539-4543.

Setiasih, I. F., Prabawati, S. P., & Wardani, I. W. (2020). Improving the Creativity of Senior High School Teachers and Students in Learning History in Klaten District. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), 3661-3669.

Stouch B. (2020). How and why our talent is changing: http://www.grownupbrain.com/books-grownupbrain.asp (accessed date: 10.07.2020) - Text: electronic.

Tunik E.E. (1997). Psychodiagnostics of creative thinking. Creative tests- St.P.: StPUPM, 315 p.

Widana, I. W., Sumandya, I. W., Sukendra, I. K., & Sudiarsa, I. W. (2020). Analysis of conceptual understanding, digital literacy, motivation, divergent of thinking, and creativity on the teacher’s skills in preparing hots-based assessments. Journal of Advance Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, 12(8), 459-466. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I8/20202612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I8/20202612

Zvegintsev V.A. (2007). Theoretical and applied linguistics: a textbook for philological faculties of pedagogical institutes / - 3rd Ed. - M.: URSS 334 p.