Human Rights Risks in the Constitutions of the American Federal States

Marina V.  Markhgeym; Alevtina E.  Novikova; Vladimir K.  Dmitriev; Ruslan M.  Dzidzoev; Ol'ga G.  Larina

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.281

Authors

Marina V. Markhgeym Belgorod State University, 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, 308015, Russia
Alevtina E. Novikova Belgorod State University, 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, 308015, Russia
Vladimir K. Dmitriev St. Petersburg state University of Economics, St. Petersburg, 21 Sadovaya Street, 191023, Russia
Ruslan M. Dzidzoev Kuban State University, 149the Stavropol Street, Krasnodar, 350040, Russia
Ol'ga G. Larina Southwest State University, 94, 50 Years of October Street, Kursk, 305040, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.281

Keywords:

Human and civil rights and freedoms, protection, risk to human rights, guarantees, court.

Abstract

The article presents the results of a comparative legal analysis of the constitutions of American federal states (Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela, Canada, Mexico, and USA) with a view to identifying the norms that minimize human rights risks. The examination depended on an argumentative way to deal with the revelation of legitimate wonders and cycles utilizing general logical (precise and consistent strategies, investigation and amalgamation) and explicit logical techniques. The declared axiological, functional, and institutional parameters are fully set only in the Constitution of Venezuela. Other constitutions that consider the objective specifics of the historical development of countries reflected the desired formulations in the framework of the axiology of individual rights and freedoms; prohibition of slavery; judicial protection of individual rights; isolation of a special human rights institution, etc. The objectives of the study led to the use of special legal methods. Thus, the comparative legal method contributed to the identification of resources and means of minimizing risks to human right advocacy in the foreign constitutions. The novelty of this research is identifying the norms that minimize human rights risks.

References

Beck, U. (2009). World at Risk. Polity. 269 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-1762(09)70218-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-1762(09)70218-4

Belyaeva, G. S., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Samsonov, V. N., & Tonkov, E. E. (2017). System of Legal Limitations on State Power: in Search of Criteria. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 7, 1934-1938.

Cardenas, D., Bermudez, C., & Echeverri, S. (2019). Is nutritional care a human right? Clinical Nutrition Experimental, 26, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yclnex.2019.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yclnex.2019.05.002

Cremer, S. (2019). How New Business Models Can Address Human Rights Risks in the Cobalt Supply Chain. Available at SSRN 3679885. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679885

Gelunenko, V. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Shadzhe, A. M., Tkhabisimova, L. A., & Veliev, E. E. (2019). Freedom of speech in constitutional binds of eastern European countries. Amazonia Investiga, 8(19), 403-407.

Genders, E., & Player, E. (2020). Long sentenced women prisoners: Rights, risks and rehabilitation. Punishment & Society, 1462474520933097. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520933097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520933097

Holzer, J. (2020). The effect of copartisan justice ministers on human rights in presidential democracies. Plos one, 15(9), e0234938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234938

Hopson, C. P. (2020). The Family vs. the State: Protecting the Rights of Parents to Raise and Educate Their Children. Geo. JL & Pub. Pol'y, 18, 605.

https://constitutions.ru/

https://worldconstitutions.ru/

Kornyushkina, A. Y., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Doronina, O. G. N., & Zajcev, S. Y. (2017). Minimization of human rights risks: the constitutional legal experience of post-soviet states. Turkish online journal of design art and communication, 7, 352-356.

Kuksin, I. N., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Samsonov, V. N., & Tonkov, E. E. (2017). Constitutional hypostases of citizenship of the westeuropean countries. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(4), 286-295. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i4.1173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i4.1173

Kuksin, I. N., Tonkov, E. E., Safronova, E. V., Vasekina, E. M., & Shabalina, E. I. (2017). The constitutional experience of consolidation the human rights function of the state in the post-soviet space. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 7: 303-308.

Losilkina, L. O., Shadzhe, A. M., Tkhabisimova, L. A., & Zajcev, V. A. (2018). Formalization of guarantees of human and civil rights and freedoms in the constitutions of the Commonwealth of Independent States. https://doi.org/10.29042/2018-3682-3685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29042/2018-3682-3685

Makarova, O. (2017). The modern context of the human development risks. Knowledge and Performance Management, 1, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.01(1).2017.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.01(1).2017.03

Makogon, B. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Minasyan, A. A., Nincieva, T. M., & Novikova, A. E. (2019). Legal form of action: the issues of content and methodology. Revista inclusiones. 6(NÚMERO ESPECIAL): 402-409.

Makogon, B. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Minasyan, A. A., Novikova, A. E., & Yarychev, N. U. (2019). Logical classification of legal procedural restrictions. Revista Inclusiones, 6, 395-401.

Makogon, B. V., Nikulin, M. I., Samsonov, V. N., Sorokoletova, M. A., & Tovstukha, O. O. (2017). Objectives and Principles of Administrative Proceedings: Doctrinal Ideas and Legislative Wordings of the Eastern European Countries. Journal of Politics and Law, 10(4): 221. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v10n4p221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v10n4p221

Novikova, A. E. (2011). Ponyatie i sushchnost' pravozashchitnyh riskov. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo. 14 (109), 151-157. (In Russian)

Novikova, A.E. (2013). Zarubezhnyj opyt konstitucionno-pravovogo zakrepleniya polozhenij, napravlennyh na minimizaciyu pravozashchitnyh riskov. Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve, 5, 16-21. (In Russian).

Popkova, E. G., Fetisova, O. V., Zabaznova, T. A., & Alferova, T. V. (2018, April). The modern global financial system: social risks vs. technological risks. In International Conference Project “The future of the Global Financial System: Downfall of Harmony” (pp. 1013-1019). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00102-5_107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00102-5_107

Shvec, YU.YU. (2019). Normotvorcheskie principy prava cheloveka na zdravoohranenie v konstituciyah zarubezhnyh stran. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoj praktiki, 6, 123-126. (In Russian)