Development and Validation of a Brief Instrument to Evaluate Primary-Care AMI Management in Mexico

Authors

  • Sergio Quiroz-Gomez Juarez Autonomus University of Tabasco, Academic Division of Health Sciences, Mexico
  • Juvenal Eduardo Salgado-Montalvo Juarez Autonomus University of Tabasco, Academic Division of Health Sciences, Mexico
  • Manuel Alfonso Baños-González Juarez Autonomus University of Tabasco, Academic Division of Health Sciences, Mexico
  • Jesús Arturo Solís-Montero Juarez Autonomus University of Tabasco, Academic Division of Health Sciences, Mexico
  • Karla del Socorro Celorio Méndez Juarez Autonomus University of Tabasco, Academic Division of Health Sciences, Mexico
  • Alejandro Ernesto Chale-De la Cruz Juarez Autonomus University of Tabasco, Academic Division of Health Sciences, Mexico
  • Crystell Guadalupe Guzmán Priego Juarez Autonomus University of Tabasco, Academic Division of Health Sciences, Mexico
  • Alejandro Jiménez-Sastré Juarez Autonomus University of Tabasco, Academic Division of Health Sciences, Mexico
  • Marisol Guzmán Moreno Juarez Autonomus University of Tabasco, Multidisciplinary Academic Division of Los Rios, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2025.14.60

Keywords:

Clinical Competence, Myocardial Infarction, Primary Health Care, Psychometrics, Reliability and Validity

Abstract

This descriptive cross-sectional study developed and validated an instrument to evaluate the initial management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at the primary-care level in Mexico. The instrument was constructed from the Mexican Social Security Institute Infarction Code and the national Clinical Practice Guideline, extracting core elements for first-contact AMI care. Expert judgment guided item selection using the Rovinelli and Hambleton approach, and items with Aiken’s index ≥0.70 were retained. A pilot test with 35 primary-care physicians assessed the preliminary version. The field sample comprised 143 physicians from the 17 municipalities of Tabasco, selected by convenience sampling. Reliability was estimated with Cronbach’s alpha. The pilot version showed α=0.636; after expert validation and refinement—including the addition of two items (on fibrinolytic dosing in adults ≥75 years and post-fibrinolysis protocol)—the final 10-item instrument achieved α=0.817. Corrected item–total correlations improved notably for item 2 (from 0.243 to 0.544), while items 5 and 8 showed the highest values in the final version. Factorability was adequate (KMO = 0.736; Bartlett’s χ²(36) = 83.609, p < 0.001). This brief, context-specific tool shows solid internal consistency and expert-supported content validity for primary-care AMI management; structural and criterion (predictive) validity should be further confirmed.

References

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Enfermedades Cardiovasculares 2024. Recovered form: https://www.paho. org/es/temas/enfermedades-cardiovasculares

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Protocolos de Atención Integral-Enfermedades Cardiovasculares-Código Infarto 2022. Recovered from: https://www.imss.gob.mx/ sites/all/statics/profesionalesSalud/investigacionSalud/historico/programas/06-pai-codigo-infarto.pdf

Borrayo-Sánchez G, Alcocer-Gamba MA, Araiza-Garaygordobil D, Arias-Mendoza A, Aubanel-Riedel P, Cortés-Lawrenz J, et al. Guía práctica interinstitucional para el tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio. Gaceta Medico de México 2019; 156(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/GMM.20000372

Salgado Montalvo JE, Solís Montero JA, Quiroz Gomez S, Guzmán Priego CG, Celorio Méndez KDS, Albarran Melzer JA. Evaluación de la atención primaria en el manejo del infarto agudo de miocardio en centros comunitarios del sureste mexicano [Evaluation of primary care in the management of acute myocardial infarction in community centers in southeastern Mexico]. Atencion Primaria 2025; 57(3): 103114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103114

Llancaqueo M. Manejo del Síndrome Coronario Agudo en el Paciente Adulto Mayor. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes 2017; 28(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2017.04.018

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Protocolos de Atención Integral-Enfermedades Cardiovasculares-Código Infarto 2022. Recovered from: https://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/ statics/profesionalesSalud/investigacionSalud/historico/programas/06-pai-codigo-infarto.pdf

Borrayo-Sánchez G, Flores-Morales A, Salas-Collado L, Altamirano-Bustamante MM. Towards medicine of excellence in Mexico: The “código infarto” protocol, a view from the perspective of translational bioethics. Gaceta Medica de Mexico 2020; 156(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/GMM.20000090

De las Mercedes, Casín-Rodríguez S, Elieser Díaz-Samada R, Sofía Dominguez-González K, Carlos Sánchez-Moraguez J, Dominguez-Fabars A. Aplicación de métodos de reperfusión coronaria en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST. Unidad Médica Pirañera 2020; 16(1). Recovered from: https://revgaleno.sld.cu/index.php/ump/article/view/451

Julio L. Reperfusión subóptima. Revista Argentina de Cardiología 2018; 86(4).

American Heart Association. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction:Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction) 2023. Recovered from: https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-attack/treatment-of-a-heart-attack. 2023.

Rovinelli RJ, Hambleton RK. On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal of Educational Research 1977; 2(2): 49-60.

Quincho Apumayta R, Cárdenas Valverde JC, Quispe Ayala C, Flores Poma IG, Inga Choque V. Formularios de Google y elaboración de instrumentos de evaluación por competencias. Revista Conrado 2022; 18(85): 424-428.

Da Silva FC, Gonçalves E, Arancibia BA, Bento G, Castro TL, Hernandez SS, et al. Estimadores de consistencia interna en las investigaciones en salud: el uso del coeficiente alfa. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 2015; 32(1): 129-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2015.321.1585

Tomás C-R. Intervalos de Confianza para el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach: aportes a la investigación pediátrica. Acta Pediatrica de México 2017; 38(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18233/APM38No4pp291-2941440

Ventura-León J, Peña-Calero BN. The world should not revolve around Cronbach’s alpha ≥ .70. Adicciones 2020; 33(4): 369-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1576

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23

How to Cite

Quiroz-Gomez, S. ., Salgado-Montalvo, J. E. ., Baños-González, M. A. ., Solís-Montero, J. A. ., Celorio Méndez, K. del S. ., Chale-De la Cruz, A. E. ., Guzmán Priego, C. G. ., Jiménez-Sastré, A. ., & Moreno, M. G. . (2025). Development and Validation of a Brief Instrument to Evaluate Primary-Care AMI Management in Mexico. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 14, 643–650. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2025.14.60

Issue

Section

General Articles