Adaptive Mean–Regression Modeling for Medical Diagnosis: A Hybrid Statistical Learning Framework with Interpretable and Adaptive Properties

Authors

  • Maysoon A. Sultan Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Hafr Al Batin, Saudi Arabia
  • ElSiddig Idriss Mohamed Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Sara Mohamed Ahmed Alsheikh Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • Irsa Sajjad Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University Changsha, Hunan, China
  • Javid Gani Dar Department of Applied Sciences, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University) Pune 412115, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2026.15.14

Keywords:

Adaptive Mean-Regression Model, Cardiovascular Disease Prediction, Medical Diagnosis, Machine Learning, Interpretable AI, Clinical Data Analysis

Abstract

This paper proposes a new statistical machine learning algorithm for medical diagnosis, called the Adaptive Mean-Regression Model (AMRM). The approach combines class-wise mean estimation with a basic linear regression correction mechanism to enhance diagnostic quality as precisely as possible, while retaining the entire interpretation. Compared with complex deep learning or probabilistic models, AMRM uses only simple statistical functions, such as calculating the mean, computing Euclidean distance, and performing linear regression. An adaptive update rule modifies the influence weights within classes based on observed diagnostic errors, allowing the model to learn from misclassifications without gradient-based optimization. Compared with more traditional machine learning models such as logistic regression, support vector machines, and random forests, the proposed AMRM achieves similar predictive accuracy while being much more interpretable and having lower computational complexity. This makes the model particularly applicable in clinical settings where transparency is crucial. The accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity of the UCI Heart Disease dataset are 81.3%, 80.5%, 78.6%, and 83.7%, respectively. The proposed AMRM, in contrast to conventional regression-based classifiers, offers a hybrid statistical framework that combines the class-wise mean representation with regression-based correction and adaptive feature weighting. This combination improves interpretability while preserving competitive predictive performance. The findings indicate that AMRM can provide a good balance between statistical transparency and diagnostic accuracy.

References

World Health Organization, 2. World Health Organization, Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland 2021.

Mohan S, Thirumalai C, Srivastava G. Effective heart disease prediction using hybrid machine learning techniques. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 81542-81554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923707

Bangun SA, Ompusunggu ES, Wilson W, Harefa EK. Support Vector Machine for Classifying Heart Failure, Hypertension, and Normal Heart Condition. JUSIFO (Jurnal Sistem Informasi) 2025; 11(1): 53-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/jusifo.v11i1.28113

Jung J, Lee H, Jung H, Kim H. Essential properties and explanation effectiveness of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review. Heliyon 2023; 9(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16110

Naser MA, Majeed AA, Alsabah M, Al-Shaikhli TR, Kaky KM. A review of machine learning’s role in cardiovascular disease prediction: recent advances and future challenges. Algorithms 2024; 17(2): 78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/a17020078

Liu T, Krentz A, Lu L, Curcin V. Machine learning based prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk using electronic health records data: systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart Journal-Digital Health 2025; 6(1): 7-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae080

Sahoo GK, Kanike K, Patro SA, Das SK, Singh P. A two-tier machine learning framework for risk assessment in drivers with cardiovascular disorders. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology 2023; 23(10): 2350070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519423500707

Pattanaik S, Nayak K. Heart diseases prediction using machine learning and deep learning models. In 2024 Sixth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technologies (CCICT). IEEE 2024; pp. 343-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCICT62777.2024.00063

Muhammad D, Ahmed I, Ahmad M O, Bendechache M. Randomized explainable machine learning models for efficient medical diagnosis. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 2024; 29(9): 6474-6481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2024.3491593

Al Gharib S, Charafeddine J, Dornaika F, Haddad S. Hybrid learning framework for explainable cardiovascular disease detection. IEEE Access 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3591241

Deepa DR, Sadu VB, Sivasamy DA. Early prediction of cardiovascular disease using machine learning: Unveiling risk factors from health records. AIP Advances 2024; 14(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0191990

Yashudas A, Gupta D, Prashant GC, Dua A, AlQahtani D, Reddy ASK. Deep-cardio: Recommendation system for cardiovascular disease prediction using iot network. IEEE Sensors Journal 2024; 24(9): 14539-14547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3373429

Yazdi F, Asadi S. Enhancing cardiovascular disease diagnosis: The power of optimized ensemble learning. IEEE Access 2025; 13: 46747-46762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3550015

Dritsas E, Trigka M. Efficient data-driven machine learning models for cardiovascular diseases risk prediction. Sensors 2023; 23(3): 1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031161

Downloads

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

Sultan, M. A. ., Mohamed, E. I. ., Ahmed Alsheikh, S. M. ., Sajjad, I. ., & Dar, J. G. . (2026). Adaptive Mean–Regression Modeling for Medical Diagnosis: A Hybrid Statistical Learning Framework with Interpretable and Adaptive Properties. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 15, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2026.15.14

Issue

Section

General Articles