High-Dimensional Fixed Effects Profiling Models and Applications in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients: Current State and Future Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2023.12.24Keywords:
Dialysis facility staffing, end-stage kidney disease, fixed effects, generalized linear mixed model, high-dimensional parameters, multilevel varying coefficient model, Poisson regression, propensity score, random effects, United States Renal Data SystemAbstract
Profiling analysis aims to evaluate health care providers, including hospitals, nursing homes, or dialysis facilities among others with respect to a patient outcome, such as 30-day unplanned hospital readmission or mortality. Fixed effects (FE) profiling models have been developed over the last decade, motivated by the overall need to (a) improve accurate identification or “flagging” of under-performing providers, (b) relax assumptions inherent in random effects (RE) profiling models, and (c) take into consideration the unique disease characteristics and care/treatment processes of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on dialysis. In this paper, we review the current state of FE methodologies and their rationale in the ESKD population and illustrate applications in four key areas: profiling dialysis facilities for (1) patient hospitalizations over time (longitudinally) using standardized dynamic readmission ratio (SDRR), (2) identification of dialysis facility characteristics (e.g., staffing level) that contribute to hospital readmission, and (3) adverse recurrent events using standardized event ratio (SER). Also, we examine the operating characteristics with a focus on FE profiling models. Throughout these areas of applications to the ESKD population, we identify challenges for future research in both methodology and clinical studies.
References
United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2022Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Available fromhttps://adr.usrds.org/2022.
United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2020 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease and in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD. [cited 2020]: Available from https://adr.usrds.org/2020.
Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kovesdy CP, Streja E, Rhee MC, Soohoo M, Chen JLT, Molnar MZ, Gillen D, Nguyen DV, Norris KC, Sim JJ, Jacobsen SS Transition of care from pre-dialysis prelude to renal replacement therapy: the blueprints of emerging research in advanced chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2017; 32(suppl_2): ii91-ii98. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfw357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfw357
United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2015 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD.
Soohoo M, Streja E, Obi Y, Rhee CM, Gillen DL, Sumida K, Nguyen DV, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Predialysis kidney function and its rate of decline predict mortality and hospitalization after starting dialysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2018; 93(8): 1074-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.01.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.01.030
Foley RN, Chen SC, Solid CA, Gilbertson DT, Collins AJ. Early mortality in patients starting dialysis appears to go unregistered. Kidney Int 2014; 86: 392-398. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2014.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2014.15
Lukowsky LR, Kheifets L, Arah OA, Nissenson AR, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Patterns and predictors of early mortality in incident hemodialysis patients: new insights. Am J Nephrol 2012; 35: 548-558. https://doi.org/10.1159/000338673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000338673
Robinson BM, Zhang J, Morgenstern H, Bradbury BD, Ng LJ McCullough KP, Gillespie BW, Hakim R, Rayner H, Fort J, Akizawa T, Tentori F, Pisoni RL. Worldwide, mortality risk is high soon after initiation of hemodialysis. Kidney Int 2014; 85: 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2013.252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2013.252
United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2018 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD.
Nissenson AR, Fine RN, Mehrotra R, Zaritsky J (Ed.) 2023. Handbook of Dialysis Therapy, 6th edition. Elsevier.
CMS. CMS 2016 Quality Strategy Overview. Available fromhttps://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityInitiativesGenInfo/Downloads/CMS-2016-Quality-Strategy-Slides.pdf
Codman E. Hospitalization standardization. Surgery, Gynecology, and Obsterrics1916; 22: 119-120.
Keenan PS, Normand SL, Lin Z, Drye EE, et al. An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance on the basis of 30-day all-cause readmission rates among patients with heart failure. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 2008; 1: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.802686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.802686
Krumholz HM, Lin Z, Drye EE, Desai MM, Han HF, Rapp MT, Mattera JA, and Normand S-L. An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day all-cause readmission rates among patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 2011; 4: 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957498
Lindenauer PK, Normand SL, Drye EE, Lin Z, Goodrich K, Desai MM, Bratzler DW, O’Donnell WJ, Metersky ML, Krumholz HM. Development, validation, and results of a measure of 30-day readmission following hospitalization for pneumonia. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2011; 6: 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.890
Horwitz L, Partovain C, Lin ZQ, Herrin, et al. 2011. Hospital-wide (all-condition) 30 day risk- standardized readmission measure. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/ Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/downloads/MMSHospital-WideAll-ConditionReadmissionRate.pdf Accessed August 25, 2023.
Horwitz L, Partovain C, Lin ZQ, Grady, et al. Development and use of an administrative claims measure for profiling hospital-wide performance on 30-day unplanned readmission. Annals of Internal Medicine 2014; 161: S66-75. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-3000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-3000
Ross JS, Normand SL, Wang Y, Ko DT, J, C, Drye EE, Keenan PS, Lichtman JH, Bueno H, Schreiner GC, and Krumholz HM. Hospital volume and 30-day mortality for three common medical conditions. New England Journal of Medicine 2010; 362: 1110-1118. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0907130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0907130
Normand ST, Glickman ME, Gatsonis CA. Statistical methods for profiling providers of medical care: Issues and applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1997; 92: 803-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1997.10474036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1997.10474036
Normand ST, Shahian DM. Statistical and clinical aspects of hospital outcomes profiling. Statistical Science 2007; 22: 206-226. https://doi.org/10.1214/088342307000000096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/088342307000000096
Ohlssen DI, Sharples LD, Spiegelhalter DJ. A hierarchical modelling framework for identifying unusual performance in health care providers. J R Statist Soc A 2007; 170: 865-890. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00487.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00487.x
Jones HE, Spiegelhalter DJ. The identification of ‘unusual’ health-care providers from a hierarchical model. American Statistician 2011; 65: 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2011.10190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2011.10190
Goldstein H, Spiegelhalter DJ. League tables and their limitations: Statistical issues in comparisons of institutional performance. J Roy Statis Soc A 1996; 159: 385-443. https://doi.org/10.2307/2983325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2983325
Ash AS, Fienberg SE, Louis TA, Normand ST, Stukel TA, Utts J Ash AS, Fienberg SE, Louis TA, Normand ST, Stukel TA, Utts J. Statistical issues in assessing hospital performance. The COPSS-CMS White Paper Committee, CMS, Washington D.C. [cited 2012]: Available from https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality-initiatives-patient-assessment-instruments/hospitalqualityinits /downloads/statistical-issues-in-assessing-hospital-performance.pdf.Accessed August 28, 2023.
McGee G, Schildcrout J, Normand S-L, Haneuse S. Outcome-dependent sampling in custer-correlated data settings with application to hospital profiling. J R Statis Soc A 2020; 183: 379-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12503
Paddock SM, Ridgeway G, Lin R, Louis T. Flexible distributions for triple-goal estimates in two-stage hierarchical models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2006; 50: 3243-3262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2005.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2005.05.008
Silber JH, Satopaa VA, Mukherjee N, Rockova V, Wang W, Hill AS, EvenShoshan O, Rosenbaum PR, George EI (2016) Improving Medicare’s Hospital Compare mortality model. Health Services Research 2016; 51: 1229-1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12478
George EI, Rockova V, Rosenbaum PR, Satopaa VA, Silber JH (2017) Mortality rate estimation and standardization for public reporting: Medicare’s Hospital Compare. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2017; 112: 933-947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1276021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1276021
CMS Hospital Compare. https://www.medicare.gov/care- compare/?providerType=Hospital. Accessed August 30, 2023.
Kalbfleisch JD, Wolfe RA. On monitoring outcomes of medical providers. Statistics in Biosciences 2013; 5: 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-013-9093-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-013-9093-x
Chen Y, Senturk D, Estes JP, Campos LF, Rhee CM, Dalrymple LS, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Nguyen DV. Performance characteristics of profiling methods and the impact of inadequate case-mix adjustment. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 2021; 50: 1854–1871. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1595649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1595649
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)/UM-KECC. Report for the standardized readmission ratio. [cited 2017]: Available from https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality- Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/ESRDQIP/Downloads/SRR_Methodology_Report_June2017.pdf Accessed August 28, 2023.
Senturk D, Chen Y, Estes JP, Campos LF, Rhee CM, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Nguyen DV. Impact of case-mix measurement error on estimation and inference in profiling of health care providers. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 2020; 49: 2206-2224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1515360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1515360
Estes JP, Chen Y, Senturk D, Rhee CM, Kurum E, You AS, Streja E, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Nguyen DV. Profiling dialysis facilities for adverse recurrent events. Statistics in Medicine 2020; 39: 1374-1389. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8482
Estes JP, Nguyen DV, Chen Y, Dalrymple LS, Rhee CM, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Senturk D. Time-dynamic profiling with application to hospital readmission among patients on dialysis (with discussion). Biometrics 2018; 74: 1383-1394. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12908
Estes JP, Nguyen DV, Chen Y, Dalrymple LS, Rhee CM, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Senturk D. Rejoinder: Time-dynamic profiling with application to hospital readmission among patients on dialysis. Biometrics 2018b; 74: 1404-1406. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12905
Chen Y, Rhee CM, Senturk D, Kurum E, Campos LF, Li Y, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Nguyen DV. Association of U.S. dialysis facility staffing with profiling of hospital-wide 30-day unplanned readmission. Kidney Diseases 2019; 5: 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1159/000496147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000496147
He K, Kalbfleisch JD, Li Y, Li Y. Evaluating hospital readmission rates in dialysis facilities; adjusting for hospital effects. Lifetime Data Analysis 2013; 19: 490-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-013-9264-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-013-9264-6
Wu W, He K, Shi X, Schaubel DE, Kalbfleisch JD. Analysis of hospital readmissions with competing risks. Stat Methods Med Res 2022; 31(11): 2189-2200. https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802221115879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802221115879
Wu W, Yang Y, Kang J, He K. Improving large-scale estimation and inference for profiling health care providers. Stat Med 2022; 41(15): 2840-2853. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9387
Xia L, He K, Li Y, Kalbfleisch J. Accounting for total variation and robustness in profiling health care providers. Biostatistics 2022; 23(1): 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa024
He K, Dahlerus C, Xia L, Li Y, Kalbfleisch JD. The profile inter-unit reliability. Biometrics 2020; 76(2): 654-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13167
He K, Kalbfleisch JD, Yang Y, Fei Z. Inter-unit reliability for nonlinear models. Stat Med 2019; 38(5): 844-854. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8005
Kalbfleisch JD, He K, Xia L, et al. Does the inter-unit reliability (IUR) measure reliability? Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 2018; 18: 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-018-0185-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-018-0185-4
Estes JP, Senturk D, Kurum E, Rhee CM, Nguyen DV. Fixed effects high-dimensional profiling models in low information context. Int J Stat Med Res 2021; 10: 118-131. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2021.10.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2021.10.11
He, K. Indirect and direct standardization for evaluating transplant centers. Journal of Hospital Administration 2019, 8(1): 9-15. https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v8n1p9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v8n1p9
Kurland BF, Heagerty PJ. Directly parameterized regression conditioning on being alive: Analysis of longitudinal data truncated by deaths. Biostatistics 2005; 6: 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxi006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxi006
Estes J, Nguyen DV, Dalrymple LS, Mu Y, Senturk D. Cardiovascular event risk dynamics over time in older patients on dialysis: A generalized multiple-index varying coefficient model approach. Biometrics 2014; 70: 754-764. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12176
Estes J, Nguyen DV, Dalrymple LS, Mu Y, Senturk D. Time-varying effect modeling with longitudinal data truncated by death: Conditional models, interpretations and inference. Statistics in Medicine 2015; 35(11): 1834-1847. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6836
Kurum E, Nguyen DV, Li Y, Rhee CM, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Senturk D. Multilevel joint models of hospitalization and survival in patients on dialysis, Stat 2021; 10: e356 (p. 1-13). https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.356
Kurum E, Nguyen DV, Banerjee S, Li Y, Rhee CM, Senturk D. A Bayesian multilevel time-varying framework for joint modeling of hospitalization and survival in patients on dialysis. Statistics in Medicine 2022; 41(29): 5597-5611. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9582
Qian Q, Nguyen DV, Telesca D, Kurum E, Rhee CM, Banerjee S, Li Y, Senturk D. Multivariate spatiotemporal functional principal component analysis for modeling hospitalization and mortality rates in dialysis patients. Biostatistics 2023; in-press. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxad013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxad013
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) [cited 2014]. Report for the standardized readmission ratio. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/ESRDQIP/Downloads/MeasureMethodologyReportfortheProposedSRRMeasure.pdf Accessed September 1, 2023.
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB: The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 1983; 70(1): 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
Rubin DB, Thomas N. Combining propensity score matching with additional adjustments for prognostic covariates. J Am Stat Assoc 2000; 95: 573-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2000.10474233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2000.10474233
D’agostino RB Jr: Tutorial in biostatistics: Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998; 17: 2265-2281. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO;2-B DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO;2-B
Thomas-Hawkins C, Flynn L, Clarke SP: Relationships between registered nurse staffing, processes of nursing care, and nurse-reported patient outcomes in chronic hemodialysis units. Nephrol Nurs J 2008; 35: 123-130.
Foley RN, Hakim RM. Why is the mortality of dialysis patients in the United States much higher than the rest of the world? J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20(7): 1432-1435 https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2009030282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2009030282
Stone PW, Pogorzelska M, Kunches L, Hirschhorn LR. Hospital staffing and healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47: 937-944. https://doi.org/10.1086/591696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/591696
Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH: Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout and job dissatisfaction. JAMA 2002; 288(16): 1987-1993. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.16.1987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.16.1987
Stratton KM, Blegen MA, Pepper G, Vaughn T. Reporting of medication errors by pediatric nurses. J Pediatr Nurs 2004; 19(6): 385-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2004.11.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2004.11.007
Dunton N, Gajewski B, Taunton RL, Moore J. Nurse staffing and patient falls in acute care hospital units. Nurs Outlook 2004; 52(1): 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2003.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2003.11.006
Thomas-Hawkins C, Denno M, Currier H, Wick G. Staff nurses’ perception of the work environment in freestanding hemodialysis facilities. Nephrol Nurs J 2003; 30(2): 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2010.10.017
Patrician PA, Pryor E, Fridman M, et al. Needlestick injuries among nursing staff: association with shift-level staffing. Am J Infect Control 2011; 39(6): 477-482. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.03.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2010.10.017
Wolfe WA.Adequacy of dialysis clinic staffing and quality of care: a review of evidence and areas of needed research. Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 58(2)166: 176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.03.027
Wolfe WA. Is it possible to reduce hospitalizations through evidence-based clinic staffing? Nephrology News & Issues 2016; Epub July 6. https://www.healio.com/nephrology/ practice-management/news/online/%7b0dd2aa31-8528-4f99-b266-34c0f30df3df%7d/is-it-possible-to-reduce-hospital-admissions-through-evidence-based-clinic-staffing. Accessed September3, 2018.
Chan KE, Lazarus JM, Wingard RL, and Hakim RM. Association between repeat hospitalization and early intervention in dialysis patients following hospital discharge. Kidney International 2009; 76: 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2009.199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2009.199
Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM. Measurement error in nonlinear models: A modern perspective. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC 2006. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420010138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420010138
Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 1993; 80: 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.1.27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.1.27
Heinze G, Schemper M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 2409-2419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1047
Aitkin M, Longford N. Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness studies (with discussion). J R Statist Soc A 1986; 149: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2981882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2981882
Goldstein H, Thomas S. Using examination results as indicators of school and college performance. J R Statist Soc A 1996; 159: 149-163. https://doi.org/10.2307/2983475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2983475
New York State Department of Health. Adult Cardiac Surgery in New York State 1998–2000. Albany: New York State Department of Health 2004.
Marshall C, Best N, Bottle A, Aylin P. Statistical issues in the prospective monitoring of health outcomes across multiple units. J R Statist Soc A 2004; 167: 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2004.apm10.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2004.apm10.x
SAS Institute Inc 2013. SAS/STAT® 13.1 User’s Guide. The GLIMMIX Procedure. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Available at https://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/ stat/131/glimmix.pdf
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 2015; 67(1): 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .