The Impact of Cyberloafing on Employees’ Job Performance: A Review of Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1647.2020.06.02Keywords:
Cyberloafing, Social media, Internet, web surfing, Goldbricking, Internet workplace leisure, Employees’ job performance, Employees’ productivity, Workplace environment, Literature reviewAbstract
Objectives: A controversy exists since long, among the researchers about the impact of cyberloafing on employees’ job performance. Some researchers study that cyberloafing distracts employees from their job descriptions; while others argue that cyberloafing is quite helpful in different ways to add quality to employees’ work. The aim of this paper is to review the past literature in order to understand the impact of cyberloafing in shaping up or destructing employees’ job performance. Moreover, the paper highlights the methodological analysis based on literature review. Future recommendations for the use of the internet by employees on office computers as well as other social media devices to enhance employees’ job performance are given.
Design: An organized review of the literature (1996- 2020) from information technology, business, management, and organizational behavior studies was performed. The topics studied were about internet, World Wide Web, cyberloafing, social media, employees’ job performance, employees’ engagement, employees’ productivity, and workplace environment.
Data Sources: Different research platforms such as ‘Research gate’, ‘Emerald’, ‘Jstor’, ‘Google Scholar’, ‘SCOPUS’, ‘ELSEVIER’, ‘SCIENCE DATA’, ‘Core’, ‘ScienceOpen’, ‘ERIC’, ‘Paperity’ and internet were used to read up literature.
Review Methods: Different articles written in English, related to employees’ behavior and performance as well as cyberloafing and social media, were studied.
Results: The review of literature showed that cyberloafing and social media significantly impact employees’ job performance. However, the findings were not consistent, and both the positive and negative impacts of cyberloafing and social media on employees’ performance were found.
Conclusion: The mixed findings indicate that cyberloafing can have both the positive and negative impact on employees’ job performance. In other words, a little bit cyberloafing is important for healthy communication, innovation and productivity; while the excessive unethical use of internet was found to have adverse effects on job performance. Therefore, it is recommended not to totally suppress cyberloafing but to devise cyberloafing control strategies which are equally acceptable to both the employees and employers. Hence, by the implementation of right cyberloafing control policies, positive outcomes of cyberloafing could be achieved.
References
Chong AYL, Khong KW, Ma T, McCabe S, Wang Y. Analyzing key influences of tourists’ acceptance of online reviews in travel decision. Internet Research 2018; 28(3): 564-586. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2017-0212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2017-0212
Mohammad J, Quoquab F, Halimah S, Thurasamy R. Work-place internet leisure and employees’ productivity: The med-iating role of employee satisfaction. Internet Research 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2017-0191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2017-0191
Al-Zwamri AAF, Hussain N. The impact of smartphones on work productivity as perceived by employees at a government department in Salalah, Oman. Journal of Islamic Social Sciences and Humanities 2017; 10: 10-20.
Sao R, Chandak S, Patel B, Bhadade P. Cyberloafing: Effects on employee job performance and behaviour, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) 2020; 8 (5): ISSN: 2277-3878. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.E4832.018520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.E4832.018520
Couldry N. Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. London: Polity Press 2012; p. 2. ISBN 9780745639208.22
Kaplan AM. If you love something, let it go mobile: Mobile marketing and mobile social media 4x4. Business Horizons 2012; 55(2): 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.009
Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. The early bird catches the news: nine things you should know about micro-blogging. Business Horizons 2011a; 54(2): 105-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.09.004
Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Two hearts in 3/4 time: how to waltz the socialmedia – viral marketing dance. Business Horizons 2011b; 54(3): 253-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.006
Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Collaborative projects (social media application): About Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Business Horizons 2014; 57(5): 617-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.05.004
Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons 2010; 53(1): 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Baturay MH, Toker S. An investigation of the impact of demographics on cyberloafing from an educational setting angle. Computers in Human Behavior 2015; 50(3): 358-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.081
Hsu SH, Yen H. Predicting good deeds in virtual communities of consumption: the cross-level interactions of individual differences and member citizenship behaviors. Internet Research 2016; 26(3): 689-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0140
Koay KY. Workplace ostracism and cyberloafing: a moderated– mediation model. Internet Research 2018; 28(4): 1122-1141. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2017-0268
Huma Z, Hussain S, Ramayah T, Malik MI. Determinants of cyberloafing: a comparative study of a public and private sector organization. Internet Research 2017; 27(1): 97-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2014-0317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2014-0317
Lara PZM, Tacoronte DV, Ding JMT. Do current anti cyberloafing disciplinary practices have a replica in research findings? A study of the effects of coercive strategies on workplace Internet misuse. Internet Research 2006; 16(4): 45-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240610690052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240610690052
Lim VKG, Chen DJQ. Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work? Behavior and Information Technology 2009; 1(11): 1-12.
Kim SJ, Byrne S. Conceptualizing personal web usage in work contexts: a preliminary framework. Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27(6): 2271-2283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.006
Lim VKG. The IT way of loafing on the job: cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behaviour 2002; 23(5): 675-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.161
Lim VKG, Teo TSH. Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore: an exploratory study. Information and Management 2005; 42(8): 1081-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.12.002
Armstrong L, Philips JG, Saling LL. Potential determinates of heavier internet usage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2000; 53(4): 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0400
Jia HH, Jia R, Karau S. Cyberloafing and personality: the impact of the big five traits and workplace situational factors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 2013; 20(3): 358-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813488208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813488208
Anandarajan M, Paravastu N, Simmers C. Perceptions of persoanl web usage in the workplace: A Q- Methodology Approach. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2006; 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.325
Oravec J. Constructuve approaches to internet recreation in the workplace. Communications of the ACM 2002; 60-63. https://doi.org/10.1145/502269.502298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/502269.502298
Quoquab F, Halimah S, Salam ZA. Does cyberloafing boost employee productivity? Proceedings of 2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), IEEE Xplore, Langkawai Island 2015; pp. 119-122. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTMET.2015.7359013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTMET.2015.7359013
Stanton JM. Company profile of the frequent Internet user. Communications of the ACM 2002; 45(1): 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1145/502269.502297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/502269.502297
Ferreira A, Plessis TD. Effect of online social networking on employee productivity. Peer Reviewed Article 2009; 11(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v11i1.397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v11i1.397
Ivarsson L, Larsson P. Personal internet usage at work: a source of recovery. Journal of Workplace Rights 2011; 16(1): 63-81. https://doi.org/10.2190/WR.16.1.e DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/WR.16.1.e
Hussain S, Parida T. Exploring cyberloafing behavior in South-central Ethiopia: A close look at Madda Walabu University. Journal of Media and Communication Studies 2017; 9: 10-16. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMCS2016.0499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JMCS2016.0499
Imran MK, Fatima T, Aslam U, Iqbal SMJ. Exploring the benefits of social media towards knowledge sharing among doctors. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research 2019; 34(2): 331-351. https://doi.org/10.33824/PJPR.2019.34.2.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33824/PJPR.2019.34.2.18
Harris AL, Rea A. Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies. Journal of IS Education 2009; 20(2): 137-144.
Gagne M, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2005; 26: 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Pitichat T. Smartphones in the workplace: Changing organizational behavior, transforming the future. A Journal of Trans disciplinary Writing and Research from Claremont Graduate University 2013; 3(1): Article 13. https://doi.org/10.5642/lux.201303.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5642/lux.201303.13
Andel SA, Kessler SR, Pindek S, Kleinman G, Paul E, Spector PE. Is cyberloafing more complex than we originally thought? Cyberloafing as a coping response to workplace aggression exposure. Computers in Human Behavior 2019; 101: 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.013
Liberman B, Seidman G, McKenna KYA, Buffardi LE. Employee job attitudes and organizational characteristics as predictors of cyberloafing. Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27(6): 2192-2199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.015
Pee LG, Woon IMY, Kankanhalli A. Explaining non-work-related computing in the workplace: A comparison of alternative models. Information and Management 2008; 45: 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.01.004
Vitak J, Crouse J, LaRose R. Personal Internet use at work: understanding cyberslacking. Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27(5): 1751-1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.03.002
Young KS, Case CJ. Internet abuse in the workplace: new trends in risk management. Cyber Psychology and Behavior 2004; 7(1): 105-111. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104322820174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104322820174
Betts TK, Setterstrom AJ, Pearson JM, Totty S. Explaining cyberloafing through a theoretical integration of theory of interpersonal behavior and theory of organizational justice.
Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 2014; 26(4): 23-42. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2014100102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2014100102
Brittany KM, Giordano C, Dilchert S. A meta-analytic investigation of cyberloafing. Career Development International 2017; 22(5): 546-564. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2017-0142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2017-0142
Li SM, Chung TM. Internet function and Internet addictive behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 2006; 22(6): 1067-1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.030
Khansa L, Kuem J, Siponen M, Sung S, Kim SS. To Cyberloaf or Not to Cyberloaf: The Impact of the Announcement of Formal Organizational Controls. Journal of Management Information Systems 2017; 34(1): 141-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1297173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1297173
Blanchard A, Henle CA. Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: the role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior 2008; 24: 1067-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.008
von Muhlen M, Ohno-Machado L. Reviewing social media use by clinicians. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA 2012; 19(5): 777-781. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000990
McAfee A. Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collabora-tion. MIT Sloan Management Review 2006; 47(3): 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2006.261380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2006.261380
Susarla A, Ha JO, Tan Y. Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Information Systems Research 2012; 23(1): 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0339
Manning J. Definition and classes of social media. Encyclopedia of Social Media and Politics. Publisher: Sage Publications 2014.
Nikitkov A, Sainty B. The role of social media in influencing career success. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management 2014; 22(4): 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-02-2014-0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-02-2014-0009
Cao X, Guo X, Vogel D, Zhong X. Exploring the influence of social media on employee work performance. Internet Research 2016; 26(2): 529-545. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2014-0299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2014-0299
Morales VJG, Rojas RM, Lopez MEL. Influence of social media technologies on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. Baltic Journal of Management 2018; 13(3): 345-367. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2017-0123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2017-0123
Yu L, Cao X, Liu Z, Wang J. Excessive social media use at work: Exploring the effects of social media overload on job performance. Information Technology & People 2018; 31(6): 1091-1112. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0237
Rao SV. Human resources management: text and cases (2nd ed.). New Delhi, India: Excel Books Press 2008.
Mathis RL, Jackson J. Human resource 21. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing management: Essential perspectives (6th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning 2011.
Ali-Hassan H, Nevo D, Wade M. Linking dimensions of social media use to job performance: the role of social capital. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2015; 24(2): 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.03.001
Armstrong M. A handbook of personnel Management Practices, Kogan Page Limited London 1995.
Sultana A, Irum S, Ahmed K, Mahmood N. Impact of Training on Employee Performance: A Study of Telecommunication Sector in Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business 2012; 4(6): 646-661.
Pew Research Centre. Teen, Social Media and Technology Overview 2015. available at: www.pewinternet.org/2015/ 04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
Ferrer E, Bousono C, Jorge J, Lora L, Miranda E, Natalizio N. Enriching social capital and improving organizational performance in the age of social networking. International Journal of Information, Business and Management 2013; 5(2): 94-109.
Kim AJ, Ko E. Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. Journal of Business Research 2012; 65(10): 1480-1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.014
Parveen F, Jaafar NI, Ainin S. Social media’s impact on organizational performance and entrepreneurial orientation in organizations. Management Decision 2016; 54(9): 2208-2234. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2015-0336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2015-0336
Solis B. Engage: the complete guide for brands and businesses to build, cultivate, and measure success in the new web 2010. available at: http://as.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/
Henle CA, Kohut G, Booth R. Designing electronic use policies to enhance employee perceptions of fairness and to reduce cyberloafing: an empirical test of justice theory. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25: 902-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.005
Coker B. Freedom to surf: the positive effects of workplace internet leisure browsing. New Technology, Work and Employment 2011; 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2011.00272.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2011.00272.x
Olajide O, Ahmad MA, Qadir BA. Effect of cyberloafing on employee performance among deposit money banks in Kaduna metropolis. Online Journal of Arts, Management and Social Sciences (OJAMSS) 2018; 3(1): 27-37.
Aguenza B, Al-Kassem AH, Som MAP. Social media and productivity in the workplace: challenges and constraints. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business 2012; 22-26.
Cheng L, Wenli L, Zhai Q, Smyth R. Understanding personal use of the internet at work: An integrated model of neutralization techniques and general deterrence theory. Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 38: 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.043
Chatterjee S, Sarker S, Valacich JS. The behavioral roots of information systems security: Exploring key factors related to unethical IT use. Journal of Management Information Systems 2015; 31(4): 49-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.1001257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.1001257
Hu Q, West R, Smarandescu L. The role of self-control in information security violations: Insights from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 2015; 31(4): 6-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.1001255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.1001255
Liang H, Xue Y, Wu L. Ensuring employees’ IT compliance: Carrot or stick? Information Systems Research 2013; 24(2): 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0427
D’Arcy J, Herath T, Shoss MK. Understanding employee responses to stressful information security requirements: A coping perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 2014; 31(2): 285-318. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222310210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222310210
Dennis AR, Robert LP Jr, Curtis AM, Kowalczyk ST, Hasty BK. Research note—Trust is in the eye of the beholder: A vignette study of postevent behavioral controls’ effects on individual trust in virtual teams. Information Systems Research 2012; 23(2): 546-558. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0364
Sangkyun K. Economics of employee internet management. The Bottom Line 2006; 19(3): 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/08880450610682545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08880450610682545
Bass B. Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, Free Press, New York, NY 1990.
Lara PZM, Gonzalez SM. The role of anomia on the relationship between organisational justice perceptions and organisational citizenship online behaviours. Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society 2009; 7(1): 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/14779960910938106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14779960910938106
Internetworldstats 2019. Internetworldstats retrieved January 20th, 2020 from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
Bock G, Ho S. Non-work related computing (NWRC). Communications of the ACM 2009; 52(4): 124-128. https://doi.org/10.1145/1498765.1498799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1498765.1498799
Derin N, Gökçe S. Are cyberloafers also innovators?: A study on the relationship between cyberloafing and innovative work behavior. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2016; 235: 694-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.070
Yeik KK. Workplace ostracism and cyberloafing: A moderated-mediation model. Internet Research 2018; 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2017-0268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2017-0268
Lara PZM. Inequity, conflict, and compliance dilemma as causes of cyberloafing. International Journal of Conflict Management 2009; 20(2): 188-201. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060910949630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060910949630
Zhang H, Zhao H, Liu J, Xu Y, Lu H. The dampening effect of employees' future orientation on cyberloafing behaviors: the mediating role of self-control. Frontiers in Psychology 2015; 6: 1482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01482
Saleh M, Daqqa I, Abdulrahim MB, Sakallah N. The effect of cyberloafing on employee productivity. International Journal of Advance and Applied Science 2018; 87-92. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.04.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.04.011
Jamali HR, Shahbaztabar P. The effects of internet filtering on users’ information-seeking behaviour and emotions. Aslib Journal of Information Management 2017; 69(4): 408-425. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2016-0218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2016-0218
Messarra LC, Karkoulian S, McCarthy R. To restrict or not to restrict personal internet usage on the job. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues 2011; 4(4): 253-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537981111190042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17537981111190042
Yingjie L, Deng S, Pan T. Does usage of enterprise social media affect employee turnover? Empirical evidence from Chinese companies. Internet Research 2019; 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2018-0140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2018-0140
Opgenhaffen & Claeys. Between hope and fear: developing social media guidelines. Employee Relations 2017; 39(2): 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2016-0086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2016-0086
Sedej T, Justinek G. Social media in internal communications: A view from senior management. Social Media in Human Resources Management (Advanced Series in Management) 2013; 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1877-6361(2013)0000012008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1877-6361(2013)0000012008
Odoom R, Anning-Dorson T, Acheampong G. Antecedents of social media usage and performance benefits in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2017; 30(3): 387-399. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2016-0088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2016-0088
Vuori M. Exploring uses of social media in a global corporation. Journal of Systems and Information Technology 2012; 14(2): 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261211232171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261211232171
Floreddu PB, Cabiddu F. Social media communication strategies. Journal of Services Marketing 2016; 30(5): 490-503. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2015-0036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2015-0036
Demircioglu MA, Chen C-A. Public employees' use of social media: Its impact on need satisfaction and intrinsic work motivation. Government Information Quarterly 2019; 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.008
Cao X, Yu L. Exploring the influence of excessive social media use at work: A three-dimension usage perspective. International Journal of Information Management 2019; 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.019
Books S, Califf C. Social media-induced thechnostress: Its impact on the job performance of it professionals and the moderating role of job characteristics. Computer Networks 2017; 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.08.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.08.020
Adzovie DE, Nyieku IE, Keku JA. Influence of Facebook usage on employee productivity: A Case of university of cape coast staff. African Jounral of Business Management 2017; 110-116. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2017.8265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2017.8265
Carlson J, Zivnuska S, Hariis R, Harris K, Carlson D. Social media use in workplace: A study of dual effects. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 2016; 15-31. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2016010102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2016010102
Shalini G, Basit A, Hassan Z. The impact of social media usage on employee and organization performance: A study on social media tools used by an IT multinational in Malaysia. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets 2018; 1(7).
Leftheriotsis I, Giannakos M. Using social media for work: Losing your time or improving your work? Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 31: 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.016
Loiacono E, McCoy S. When did fun become so much work: The impact of social media invasiveness on continued social media use. Information Technology & People 2018; 31(4): 966-983. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0239
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
