Self-Correction vs. Lecturer-Correction: Effects on Research Achievement and Alcohol Use in Intellectual Disabled Undergraduates in Federal Universities of Southern Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2025.13.02.7Keywords:
Self-correction, Lecturer-correction, Students with intellectual disabilities, Undergraduate Achievement, Interest in Research, Alcohol use, LecturersAbstract
Aim: Within Nigerian universities, students with intellectual disabilities remain under-supported in terms of personalized instructional strategies that target both academic improvement and psychosocial well-being. The purpose of the study was to compare self-correction vs Lecturer-correction: Effects on research achievement and Alcohol use in Intellectual Disabled undergraduates in Federal Universities of Southern Nigeria. Method: This study adopted a quasi-experimental research design. The area of the study is Southern Nigeria. The population consists of all 3,092 students with intellectual disabilities enrolled in two selected federal universities in Southern Nigeria, specifically in Cross River and Akwa Ibom States. The sample size for this study was 120 final-year students with intellectual disabilities who depend on alcohol to cope with stress and improve self-esteem using a multi-stage sampling technique. Three instruments were used for data collection. They were the Research Achievement Test (RAT), the Interest Inventory Test (IIT), and the Alcohol Use Screening Tool (modified AUDIT). The screening criteria for alcohol dependence are that students must be 18 years and older, students must have a history of substance use, mental health conditions (depression, anxiety), and a history of use of medications contraindicated with alcohol. The study was validated by Psychology, Measurement, and Evaluation experts at the University of Calabar. The data collected were analyzed for internal consistency using the Cronbach Alpha method, which yielded a reliability index of 0.83. The test scores for the study were generated from pre-tests and post-tests using the Research Methods Achievement Test and Research Method Interest Inventory Test.
Mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions. The pretest-posttest mean gains of each strategy of the two strategies were computed. Also, the null hypotheses formulated for the study were tested at a 0.05 level of significance using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA).
Results: The findings revealed that student correction strategies are more effective than lecturer correction strategies in enhancing the research method achievement of students with intellectual disabilities. The self-correction strategy significantly improves student interest in research methods more than the lecturer-led correction approach. There is a significant difference in achievement between male and female students, regardless of the correction strategy used. No statistically significant difference in interest scores between male and female students taught research methods using either lecturer-correction or self-correction strategies. Male and female students differed in their alcohol use outcomes following instruction using either the self-correction or lecturers’ correction strategies.
Conclusion: Based on the result of the study, it was concluded that student correction strategies are more effective than lecturer correction strategies in enhancing the research method achievement of students with intellectual disabilities. The self-correction strategy significantly improves student interest in research methods more than the lecturer-led correction approach. There is a significant difference in achievement between male and female students, regardless of the correction strategy used. No statistically significant difference in interest scores between male and female students taught research methods using either lecturer-correction or self-correction strategies. Male and female students differed in their alcohol use outcomes following instruction using either the self-correction or lecturers’ correction strategies.
Recommendation: Given the superior effectiveness of student correction strategies over lecturer-led corrections in enhancing students’ achievement in research methods, it is recommended that educators integrate structured self-correction approaches into their teaching. This can be achieved through guided reflection exercises, peer review tasks, and the use of checklists or correction templates that promote independent learning and metacognitive development.
References
World Health Organization (WHO). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO Press; 2022.
Ngwoke DO. Psychology of learning. Enugu: Chuka Educational Publishers; 2020.
Okoro AU. Motivation and interest: Tools for effective curriculum implementation. J Curric Instr 2021; 14(2): 88-97.
Offorma GC. Curriculum implementation and learner-centered approaches. Onitsha: Africana-First Publishers; 2024.
Ogunwale A. Substance abuse and mental health challenges among Nigerian students with disabilities. West Afr J Ment Health 2021; 9(1): 21-31.
Zimmerman BJ. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Contemp Educ Psychol 2022; 67: 101-14.
Nnodum BI, Obidile CA. Academic inclusion and support services for students with disabilities in Nigerian higher education. J Incl Educ 2021; 10(1): 59-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/poljes-2021-0008
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed., text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Brown AL, Campione JC. Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments. In: Schauble L, Glaser R, editors. Innovations in learning. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2020. p. 289-325.
Swain J, French S. Inclusive education: Issues in supporting students with intellectual disabilities. London: Sage Publications; 2020.
Ajayi MO. Inclusive pedagogy and learner engagement in Nigerian universities. J Educ Reform 2023; 19(2): 45-59.
Rodgers TA, Iwata BA. Strategies for correcting errors in applied behavior analysis. J Behav Interv 2022; 18(3): 123-37.
Lee J. Feedback strategies and second language writing development. Appl Linguist Rev 2022; 13(1): 23-42.
Ellis R. Theoretical perspectives on corrective feedback in language learning. TESOL Q 2019; 53(4): 911-36.
Akintunde MO. Feedback and error treatment in inclusive classrooms: A Nigerian perspective. J Educ Innov Dev Ctries 2024; 6(2): 101-14.
Ferris D. Treatment of error in second language student writing. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press; 2022.
Hartshorn J. Corrective feedback and learner development: Practical insights. Lang Educ Today 2022; 8(3): 55-70.
Bitchener J. Corrective feedback in second language acquisition. London: Routledge; 2025.
Edge J. Mistakes and correction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2023.
Yingliang W. Revisiting the error correction debate in education. Asian J Educ Res 2024; 24(1): 14-29.
Scheen M. The limits of lecturer feedback: Student motivation and cognitive readiness. Educ Psychol Pract 2021; 37(2): 87-100.
Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1978.
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD). Definition of intellectual disability [Internet] 2021 [cited 2025 Jun 17]. Available from: https://www.aaidd.org
Nnodum BI, Obidile IO. Challenges of inclusive education in Nigeria's public universities: A policy perspective. Niger J Educ Res Eval 2021; 20(2): 42-55.
Schalock RL, Borthwick-Duffy S, Bradley VJ, Buntinx WHE, Coulter DL, Craig EM, et al. Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. 11th ed. Washington (DC): AAIDD; 2020.
Maulik PK, Mascarenhas MN, Mathers CD, Dua T, Saxena S. Prevalence of intellectual disability: A meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil 2021; 32(2): 419-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018
Emerson E, Hatton C. Health inequalities and people with intellectual disabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192484
Bakare MO, Munir KM. Challenges and prospects of intellectual disability research in sub-Saharan Africa. J Intellect Disabil Res 2021; 55(1): 1-8.
Friend M, Bursuck WD. Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom lecturers. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2019.
Hallahan DP, Kauffman JM, Pullen PC. Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education. 14th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.926
Ainscow M, Miles S. Developing inclusive education systems: How can we move policies forward? Prospects 2019; 39(3): 301-12.
Matson JL, Shoemaker ME. Psychopathology and intel-lectual disability. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2019; 22(5): 447-51.
Ogunwale A. Substance abuse and academic stress among university students in Nigeria. Niger J Health Psychol 2021; 14(2): 101-15.
Wehmeyer ML, Agran M, Hughes C, Martin JE, Mithaug DE, Shogren KA. Promoting self-determination in students with developmental disabilities. New York: Guilford Press; 2023.
Oliver M. Understanding disability: From theory to practice. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan; 2016.
Grigal M, Hart D, Weir C. Think College: Postsecondary education options for students with intellectual disabilities. Baltimore (MD): Paul H. Brookes Publishing; 2022.
Ogunyemi B. Learning difficulties among Nigerian university students: A review. Afr J Educ Stud 2019; 5(1): 14-22.
Ngwoke DU. Psychology of learning. Enugu: Timex Press; 2020.
Okoro AN. Student motivation and instructional strategies in Nigerian universities. Afr J Educ Res 2021; 11(2): 33-44.
Hartshorn KJ. The role of feedback in second language acquisition. J Appl Linguist 2022; 18(1): 33-47.
Ajuwon PM. Inclusive education for students with disabilities in Nigeria: Current status, challenges, and prospects. Afr J Spec Educ 2020; 15(1): 13-22.
Adeyemi TO. Predicting students' performance in senior secondary certificate examinations from performance in junior secondary certificate examinations in Ondo State, Nigeria. Humanit Soc Sci J 2018; 3(1): 26-36.
Aremu AO. Academic performance: 5 factors inventory. Ibadan: Stirling-Horden Publishers; 2023.
Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS, Linn MC. Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2020; 136(1): 103-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018053
Voyer D, Voyer SD. Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2024; 140(4): 1174-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036620
Johnston LD, Miech RA, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Patrick ME. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use 1975-2018: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2019 [cited 2025 Jun 17]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/2027.42/150621
Greenfield SF, Back SE, Lawson K, Brady KT. Substance abuse in women. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2020; 33(2): 339-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2010.01.004
Chen CY, Yeung AS, Johnston DA. Gender differences in the impact of social support on school satisfaction among students with special educational needs. Educ Psychol 2024; 34(6): 709-25.
Slade EP, Wissow LS, Owens PL. Gender and outcomes of substance use prevention programs: A meta-analytic review. Prev Sci 2023; 14(3): 273-85.
Marsch LA, Bickel WK, Badger GJ, Quesnel KJ. Gender differences in substance use treatment outcomes in students with learning and intellectual disabilities. Addict Behav 2025; 30(8): 1471-81.
Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin S, Flint KH, Hawkins J, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance — United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill Summ 2022; 61(4): 1-162.
Taanila A, Ebeling H, Tiihala M, Kaakinen M, Moilanen I, Hurtig T. Gender differences in school performance of adolescents with intellectual disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2023; 30(2): 95-103.
Skaalvik EM, Skaalvik S. Gender differences in mathematics and verbal achievement, self-perception and motivation. Br J Educ Psychol 2024; 74(4): 561-77.
Duckworth AL, Seligman MEP. Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. J Educ Psychol 2023; 98(1): 198-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198
Hyde JS. The gender similarities hypothesis. Am Psychol 2025; 60(6): 581-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
Halpern DF, Benbow CP, Geary DC, Gur RC, Hyde JS, Gernsbacher MA. The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2017; 8(1): 1-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x
Brown AL, Campione JC. Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In: Schauble L, Glaser R, editors. Innovations in learning: New environments for education. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 2024. p. 289-325.
Santangelo T, Graham S. Self-regulated strategy develop-ment in writing: A meta-analysis of its effects on writing quality and motivation. J Educ Psychol 2023; 108(2): 267-91.
Kame'enui EJ, Simmons DC. Effective teaching strategies for students with learning disabilities. London: Routledge; 2024.
Schunk DH, DiBenedetto MK. Motivation and social-emotional learning in students with intellectual disabilities. J Learn Disabil 2020; 53(4): 263-71.
Swanson HL, Hoskyn M. Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Rev Educ Res 2018; 68(3): 277-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003277
Hastings RP, Beck A, Daley D, Hill C. The impact of lecturer feedback on the academic achievement of students with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2025; 59(9): 871-82.
Madaus JW, Shaw SF. Research on students with intellectual disabilities and learning strategies: A review. Except Child 2018; 72(3): 291-308.
Booth T, Ainscow M. The Index for Inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. 3rd ed. Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education (CSIE); 2021.
Forlin C, Chambers D. Lecturer preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia Pac J Teach Educ 2021; 39(1): 17-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2010.540850
Meece JL, Glienke BB, Burg S. Gender and motivation. J Sch Psychol 2016; 44(5): 351-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004
Eccles JS, Wang MT. So, what is student engagement anyway? Educ Psychol 2022; 47(1): 5-20.
Vantieghem W, Vermeersch H, Van Houtte M. Why "gender" disappeared from the gender gap: (Re-)introducing gender identity theory to educational gender gap research. Soc Psychol Educ 2024; 17(3): 357-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9248-8
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 2023; 11(4): 227-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Kramarski B, Michalsky T. Preparing pre-service lecturers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learn Instr 2020; 20(5): 434-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
Butler DL, Winne PH. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Rev Educ Res 2019; 65(3): 245-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
Hastings RP, Beck A, Daley D, Hill C. The impact of lecturer feedback on the academic achievement and interest of students with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2023; 59(9): 871-82.
Madaus JW, Shaw SF. Research on students with intellectual disabilities and learning strategies: A review. Except Child 2025; 72(3): 291-308.
Swain J, French S. Disability on equal terms. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2020.
Peet M. The learning organization: Towards a paradigm for mutually beneficial learning. In: Jarvis P, editor. The Routledge International Handbook of Lifelong Learning. London: Routledge; 2020. p. 97-106.
Brannon L, Knoblauch CH. On students' rights to their own texts. In: Rose M, editor. When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other composing-process problems. New York: Guilford Press; 2019. p. 117-27.
Benge M, Harder A. Learning through interests: A strategy for engaging today's students. J Agric Educ 2019; 56(1): 181-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-wc340-2019
Melvina A, Ekpang PU, Okeke SU, Emmanuel UI, Achi NB, Fredrick AO, et al. Prediction of self-concept and anxiety on the tendency of postgraduate students with learning disabilities (LD) to acquire research skills in two public universities of Cross River State, Nigeria: Implications for counseling. J Intellect Disabil Diagn Treat 2023; 11: 146-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2023.11.03.4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
