The Study of the Self-Development Model in the Context of Structural Security of the Individual Integrity

Iryna V. Ievtushenko; Yevheniia Ðœ. Kaliuzhna; Olena O. Nezhynska

doi:10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.4

Authors

Iryna V. Ievtushenko Training Institute for the State Employment Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Yevheniia Ðœ. Kaliuzhna Training Institute for the State Employment Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Olena O. Nezhynska Training Institute for the State Employment Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.4

Keywords:

Self-development, additivity, structure, personality, psychology.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study is the theoretical substantiation and testing of the methodological apparatus for determining the possibility of self-improvement and maintaining the level of personal psychological attitudes for social and professional interaction.

Background: The individual is perceived in the social environment as complex integrity having specific sets of its own properties and definitions. The implementation of professional standards, the creation of new organizational and psychological mechanisms in society puts forward new requirements for personality.

Method: The article presents a model for the formation of a qualitative perception of the possibilities of correcting motives and personality traits, which impact on the social interaction of a person.

Results: Analysis of the obtained results allowed to admit the effectiveness of authors’ experimental methodology. The authors show that the structural support for the development of the psychological characteristics of addictive individuals should be based on an understanding of the boundaries of social and professional interaction and the determination of the possibilities for its adjustment.

Conclusion: The authors presented a model for the formation of a qualitative perception of the possibilities of correcting motives and personality traits. This, in turn, forms the possibility of defining a complex that contributes to additional social interaction between the components of the social structure.

References

Kim H, Lee Y. A structural model of customer relationship management (CRM) strategies, rapport, and learner intentions in lifelong education. Asia Pacific Education Review 2019; 21: 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09583-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09583-3

Altinay F, Dagli G, Altınay Z. Role of technology and management in tolerance and reconciliation education. Quality & Quantity 2017; 51(6): 2725-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0419-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0419-x

Guntzburger Y, Pauchant TC, Tanguy PA. Ethical Risk Management Education in Engineering: A Systematic Review. Science and Engineering Ethics 2017; 23(2): 323-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9777-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9777-y

McDonald RA. Reframing Management Education: A Humanist Context for Teaching in Business and Society. Interchange 2000; 31(4): 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011007310120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011007310120

Agasisti T. Management of Higher Education Institutions and the Evaluation of their Efficiency and Performance. Tertiary Education and Management 2017; 23(3): 187-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1336250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1336250

Al-Zawahreh A, Khasawneh S, Al-Jaradat M. Green management practices in higher education: the status of sustainable leadership. Tertiary Education and Management 2019; 25(1): 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-018-09014-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-018-09014-9

Teehankee B. Critical realist action research and humanistic management education. Humanistic Management Journal 2018; 3(1): 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-018-0033-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-018-0033-2

Riad Shams SM, Belyaeva Z. Quality assurance driving factors as antecedents of knowledge management: a stakeholder-focussed perspective in higher education. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 2019; 10(2): 423-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0472-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0472-2

Alifanovene D, Vaitkevichene A. Stress and coping with it in the context of the professional activities of social educators and social workers. Psychology of stress and coping behavior in modern Russian Society 2013; 1: 72-7.

Lloyd C, King R, Chenoweth L. Social work, stress and burnout: A review. Journal of Mental Health 2002; 11(3): 255-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230020023642

Kusainov AK. Comparative pedagogy. Almaty: Prosveschenie Kazahstan, 2007.

Macheridis N. Balancing authority and autonomy in higher education by implementing an agile project management approach. Tertiary Education and Management 2018; 24(2): 128-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1400092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1400092

Chen Y, Daamen TA, Heurkens EWTM, Verheul WJ. Interdisciplinary and experiential learning in urban development management education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09541-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09541-5

Davies JL. Planning and Management for Excellence and Efficiency of Higher Education. Higher Education Policy 1992; 5(4): 62. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.1992.79 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.1992.79

Teichler U. Research on higher education and employment and its implication for higher education management. Higher Education Policy 1995; 8(1): 11-5. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.1995.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.1995.2

Kuoppakangas P, Suomi K, Stenvall J, Pekkola E, Kivistö J, Kallio T. Revisiting the five problems of public sector organisations and reputation management---the perspective of higher education practitioners and ex-academics. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing 2019; 16: 147-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00223-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00223-5

O’Donoghue C, Heanue K. The impact of formal agricultural education on farm level innovation and management practices. The Journal of Technology Transfer 2018; 43(4): 844-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9529-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9529-9

Alstete JW. Knowledge management and higher education: a critical analysis. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 2006; 4(3): 252-3. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500104

Degn L. Sensemaking, sensegiving and strategic management in Danish higher education. Higher Education, 2015; 69(6): 901-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9812-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9812-3

Basari G, Altinay Z. Tolerance, equality and access in all levels of education quality management. Quality & Quantity 2018; 52(2): 961-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0550-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0550-3

Ņikišins J. Perceptions of social climate in the Baltic countries: Methodological and comparative issues. Filosofija, Sociologija 2017; 28(4): 257-67.

Avramchenko SM, Evtushenko IV, Sivoplyas NV. Archetypal symbolism in the process of recognising the internal super-transcendence of the psyche. Slovyansk: Kantsler, 2007.

Kaluzhnaya EN. Functional model of anxiety as stable features of personality. Problems of modern psychology: Collection of scientific works of the GS Kostyuk Institute of Psychology of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine and the State Higher Educational Institution "Zaporizhzhya National University" 2015; 2(8): 97-102.

Nezhynska OO, Tymenko VM. Basics of coaching. Kyiv; Kharkiv: TOV “DISA PLYUS”, 2017.