The Development Process of the Ecological Education in Independent Kazakhstan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.35Keywords:
Development, process, ecological, education, Independent Kazakhstan.Abstract
Today, the world community understands that one of the main reasons for the emergence of the global ecological crisis is the low education level, including the ecological one. On the 21st century threshold, the individual's ecological development is becoming a priority and a meaning-forming factor in state education policy. In many ways, it acts not only as a means of preserving nature but also of human civilization as a whole.
This study recommends theorizing and establishing ecological education among learners. The future teacher needs to connect diverse thoughts about ecology and attempt to understand effective practices to cultivate a space of reflection for students and devise effective ways and methodologies to foster ecological education skills thought among student learners.
The purpose of the present study was to collect and analyze environmental education undertaken with various subjects. For systematic analysis, selected databases and journals were analyzed across pre-determined criteria.
The close examination resulted in 11 studies reporting the effects of the interventions (e.g., hands-on practices, field trip activities) and 4 studies reporting participants' views on the effects of the interventions in general. Later, these studies were subjected to content analysis to present the trends and to synthesize the common findings of the selected studies. The techniques and instructions used as the intervention in these selected studies were observed to contribute to the development of participants' gains associated with knowledge of the environment and nature, perception of nature, environmental effect, responsible environment behaviors, and conception and understanding of science.
References
Muravjeva EV. Ecological education of technical students as a basic constituent of the strategy for ecological crisis overcoming. Synopsis of the Doctoral thesis, Kazan 2008.
Toomey AH, Knight AT, Barlow J. Navigating the space between research and implementation in conservation. Conserv Lett 2017; 10: 619-625. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12315
Krasny M. A response to Scott's concerns about the relevance of environmental education research: applying social-ecological systems thinking and consilience to defining research goals. Environ Educ Res 2009; 15: 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620902770352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620902770352
Marcinkowski T, Reid A. Reviews of research on the attitude-behavior relationship and their implications for future environmental education research. Environ Educ Res 2019; 25: 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1634237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1634237
Cornell J. Listening to Nature Now to Deepen Your Awareness of Nature. NC, 1987; p. 95.
Hutchins E. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press 1995; p. 354. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
Kohlberg L. The development of Children's Orientations towards a moral Order. Chicago 1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000269667
Simon SB, Kirshenbaum HN. Values, and Future Education Moment. Learning for Tomorrow. NY 1974.
Ward Leo R. Philosophy of Education. Chicago 1963.
Weinberg C. Humanistic Foundation of Education. NY 1972.
Urlich Roger S. Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. -USA: Texas 1993; p. 66.
Maslow AH. The Farther Reaches of Human Nature.- NY 1971; p. 409.
Perry RB. General Theory of Value. Cambridge 1950.
Mead GH. Mind, self, and society. Chicago 1934.