The Performance of Hybrid Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (AnMBRs) Added with Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC) Based on Different Sludge Retention Times

Authors

  • E-Chuan Tan Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology, University of Tunku Abdul Rahman, 31900 Kampar Perak Malaysia
  • Sze Pin Tan Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology, University of Tunku Abdul Rahman, 31900 Kampar Perak Malaysia
  • Meng Khai Low Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology, University of Tunku Abdul Rahman, 31900 Kampar Perak Malaysia
  • Po Kim Lo Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology, University of Tunku Abdul Rahman, 31900 Kampar Perak Malaysia
  • Mohammed J.K. Bashir University of Tunku Abdul Rahman
  • Andrew Chai Han Liang Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology, University of Tunku Abdul Rahman, 31900 Kampar Perak Malaysia
  • Humaira Nisar Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology, University of Tunku Abdul Rahman, 31900 Kampar Perak Malaysia
  • Choon Aun Ng Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology, University of Tunku Abdul Rahman, 31900 Kampar Perak Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2015.04.02.6

Keywords:

Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME), Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR), membrane fouling, powdered activated carbon (PAC), sludge retention times (SRTs), F/M ratio.

Abstract

In this study, the effects of different sludge retention times (SRTs) on membrane fouling control with the addition of powdered activated carbon (PAC) were investigated for the anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs). Chemical oxygen demand (COD), mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS), food to microorganisms (F/M) ratio, particle size distribution, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and their relationships with membrane fouling were studied for AnMBR added with PAC at different SRTs. As SRT of the AnMBR increased to higher days, MLVSS concentration would increase and F/M ratio decreased and it was found to have a better membrane fouling control. It was also noticed that PAC addition would decrease EPS concentration and increased the floc size of the biomass which would help to reduce membrane fouling rate of AnMBRs.

Author Biography

Mohammed J.K. Bashir, University of Tunku Abdul Rahman

Engineering and Green Technology

References

Ahmad AL, et al. Water Recycling from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Using Membrane Technology. Desalination 2003; 157: 87-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00387-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00387-4

Wong YS, Kadir MOAB, Teng TT. Biological kinetic evaluation of anaerobic stabilization pond treatment of palm oil mill effluent. Bioresource Technology 2009; 100: 4969-4975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.074

Guest JS, Skerlos SJ, Barnard JL, et al. A new planning and design paradigm to achieve sustainable resource recovery from wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43: 6126-6130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es9010515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es9010515

Judd S. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment 2010. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

Watanabe R, Qiao W, Norton M, Wakahara S, Li Y. Recent developments in municipal wastewater treatment using anaerobic membrane bioreactor: A Review. Journal of Water Sustainability 2014; 4(2): 101-122.

Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnology 2010; 85: 849-860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7

Bérubé PR, Hall ER, Sutton PM. Parameters governing permeate flux in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating low-strength municipal wastewaters: A literature review. Water Environment Research 2006; 78(8): 887-896. http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143005X72858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/106143005X72858

Huang Z, Ong SL, Ng HY. Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: Effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling. Water Research 2011; 45: 705-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.035

Masse A, Sperandio M, Cabassud C. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Res 2006; 40(12): 2405-2415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.015

Janeczko AK, Walters EB, Schuldt SJ, et al. Fate of malathion and a phosphonic acid in activated sludge with varying solids retention times. Water Research 2014; 57: 127-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.031

Lin HJ, Peng W, Zhang MJ, Chen JR, Hong HC, Zhang Y. A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors: Applications, membrane fouling and future perspectives. Desalination 2013; 314: 169-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.019

Ng CA, Darren S, Bashir JK, et al. Optimization of membrane bioreactors by the addition of powdered activated carbon. Bioresource Technology 2013; 138: 38-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.129

Akram A, Stuckey DC. Flux and performance improvement in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) using powdered activated carbon (PAC). Process Biochemistry 2008; 43(1): 93-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2007.10.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2007.10.020

Hu AY, Stuckey DC. Activated carbon addition to a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor: effect on performance, transmembrane pressure, and flux. J Environ Eng 2007; 133: 73-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2007)133:1(73) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2007)133:1(73)

Ozgun H, Dereli RK, Ersahin ME, Kinaci C, Spanjers H, van Lier JB. A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: Integration options, limitations and expectations. Separation and Purification Technology 2013; 118: 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.036

Orshansky F, Narkis N. Characteristics of organics removal by PACT simultaneous adsorption and biodegradation. Water Resource 1997; 31: 391-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00227-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00227-8

Masuko T, Metori K, Kizawa Y, Kusama T, Miyake M. Design and synthesis of a novel water-soluble NBDA receptor antagonist with a 1, 4, 7, 10-tetraazacyclododecane group. Chem Pharm Bull 2005; 53(4): 444-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1248/cpb.53.444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.53.444

Wang XH, Qian JJ, Li XF, Chen K, Ren YP, Hua ZZ. Influences of sludge retention time on the performance of submerged membrane bioreactors with the addition of iron ion. Desalination 2012; 295: 24-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.04.002

Zubair A, Cho J, Lim BR, Song KG, Ahn KH. Effects of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 2007; 287(2): 211-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.036

Liu Y, Wang L, Cui H, Zhang J. Performance improvement of hybrid membrane bioreactor with PAC addition for water reuse. Water Science and Technology 2005; 52: 383-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0715

Yan XX, Bilad MR, Gerards R, Vriens L, Piasecka A, Vankelecom FJ. Comparison of MBR performance and membrane cleaning in a single-stage activated sludge system and a two-stage anaerobic/aerobic (A/A) system for treating synthetic molasses wastewater. Journal of Membrane Science 2012; 394-395: 49-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.014

Laspidou CS, Rittman BE. Non-steady State Modelling of Extracellular Polymeric Subtances, Soluble Microbial Products, and Active and Inert Biomass. Water Research 2002; 36: 1983-1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00414-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00414-6

Kim JS, Lee CH, Chun HD. Comparison of ultrafiltration characteristics between activated sludge and BAC sludge. Water Research 1998; 32: 3443-3451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00104-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00104-3

Lin CK, Tsai TY, Liu JC, Chen MC. Enhanced biodegradation of petrochemical wastewater using ozonation and BAC advanced treatment system. Water Research 2000; 35: 699-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00254-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00254-2

Downloads

Published

2015-07-08

How to Cite

Tan, E.-C., Tan, S. P., Low, M. K., Lo, P. K., Bashir, M. J., Liang, A. C. H., Nisar, H., & Ng, C. A. (2015). The Performance of Hybrid Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors (AnMBRs) Added with Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC) Based on Different Sludge Retention Times. Journal of Membrane and Separation Technology, 4(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6037.2015.04.02.6

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work

Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Publisher retain copyright .

  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC