A Simple Approach to Testing the Potency of Government Purchases to Stimulate Aggregate Demand

Authors

  • Dimitris Hatzinikolaou University of Ioannina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2013.02.9

Keywords:

Ricardian equivalence, government purchases, ex ante crowding out

Abstract

Abstract: The paper proposes a new approach to testing the potency of government purchases to stimulate the economy by testing a set of conditions implied by the Ricardian Equivalence (RE) proposition that a typical household incorporates the government's budget constraint into its own. These conditions are as follows: (1) private consumption, income, and government purchases form a “levels relationshipâ€; and (2) considering consumption as the dependent variable, the coefficients of income and of government purchases are 1 and -1. The last restriction is also implied by the hypothesis that consumption and government purchases are perfect substitutes, however, so the proposed approach cannot distinguish between the perfect substitutability and the RE hypotheses. This restriction is thus referred to in the paper as the hypothesis of direct or ex ante full crowding out. If it holds, then the multiplier of government purchases is zero. Using US quarterly data, 1947.1-2012.1, the results suggest that a “levels relationship†exists and that the coefficient of government purchases is about -0.4 and significantly below -1, thus leading to the conclusion that government purchases stimulate aggregate demand and output.

Author Biography

Dimitris Hatzinikolaou, University of Ioannina

Department of Economics

References

Aschauer, David Alan. 1985. “Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Demand.” American Economic Review 75(1):117-127.
Auerbach, Alan J. and Yuriy Gorodnichenko. 2012. “Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4(2):1-27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/pol.4.2.1
Elliott, Graham, Thomas J. Rothenberg, and James H. Stock. 1996. “Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root.” Econometrica 64(4):813-836.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2171846
Feldstein, Martin. 1982. “Government Deficits and Aggregate Demand.” Journal of Monetary Economics 9(1):1-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(82)90047-2
Giorgioni, Gianluigi and Ken Holden. 2003. “Does the Ricardian Equivalence Proposition Hold in Less Developed Countries?” International Review of Applied Economics 17(2):209-221.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0269217032000064062
Gonzalo, Jesus. 1994. “Five Alternative Methods of Estimating Long-run Equilibrium Relationships.” Journal of Econometrics 60:203-233.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)90044-2
Greene, William H. 2000. Econometric Analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gregory, Allan W. and Bruce E. Hansen. 1996a. “Residual-based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts.” Journal of Econometrics 70:99-126.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(69)41685-7
Gregory, Allan W. and Bruce E. Hansen. 1996b. “Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime and Trend Shifts.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 58(3):555-560.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1996.mp58003008.x
Hakkio, Craig S. and Mark Rush. 1991. “Is the Budget Deficit “Too Large?” Economic Inquiry 29:429-445.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1991.tb00837.x
Haug, Alfred A. 1991. “Cointegration and Government Borrowing Constraints: Evidence for the United States.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 9(1):97-101.
Ilzetzki, Ethan, Enrique G. Mendoza, and Carlos A. Végh. 2013. “How Big (Small?) Are Fiscal Multipliers?” Journal of Monetary Economics 60:239-254.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011
Khalid, Ahmed M. 1996. “Ricardian Equivalence: Empirical Evidence from Developing Economies.” Journal of Development Economics 51:413-432.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(96)00422-1
Kormendi, Roger C. 1983. “Government Debt, Government Spending, and Private Sector Behavior.” American Economic Review 73(5):994-1010.
Kwiatkowski, Denis, Peter C.B. Phillips, Peter Schmidt, and Yongcheol Shin. 1992. “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure Are we that Economic Time Series Have a Unit Root?” Journal of Econometrics 54:159-178.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
Lee, Junsoo and Mark C. Strazicich. 2003. “Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85(4):1082-1089.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815961
Lee, Junsoo and Mark C. Strazicich. 2004. “Minimum LM Unit Root Test with One Structural Break.” http: //econ.appstate.edu/RePEc/pdf/wp0417.pdf
Miller, Stephen M. 1982. “Crowding Out: A Test of Some Direct Substitutability Hypotheses.” Journal of Macroeconomics 4(4):419-432.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(82)90061-1
Nieh, Chien-Chung and Tsung-wu Ho. 2006. “Does the Expansionary Government Spending Crowd Out the Private Consumption? Cointegration Analysis in Panel Data.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 46:133-148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2004.11.004
Pesaran, M. Hashem, Yongcheol Shin, and Richard J. Smith. 2001. Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 16:289-326.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
Ramey, Valerie A. 2011. “Can Government Purchases Stimulate the Economy?” Journal of Economic Literature 49(3):673-685.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.3.673
Reitschuler, Gerhard and Jesús Crespo Cuaresma. 2004. “Ricardian Equivalence Revisited: Evidence from OECD Countries.” Economics Bulletin 5(16):1-10.
Romer, David. 2006. Advanced Macroeconomics. 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, Irwin.

Downloads

Published

2013-04-25

How to Cite

Hatzinikolaou, D. (2013). A Simple Approach to Testing the Potency of Government Purchases to Stimulate Aggregate Demand. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 2, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2013.02.9

Issue

Section

Articles