Optimization of Process Parameters for Generation of Nanocellular Polymer Foams

Authors

  • Subhendu Bhattacharya Rheology and Materials Processing Centre (RMPC), School of Civil, Chemical & Environmental Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Rahul Gupta Rheology and Materials Processing Centre (RMPC), School of Civil, Chemical & Environmental Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
  • Sati N. Bhattacharya Rheology and Materials Processing Centre (RMPC), School of Civil, Chemical & Environmental Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5995.2013.02.01.6

Keywords:

Nanocellular, DOE, optimization, batch foaming

Abstract

High melt strength polypropylene nanocomposites, PPNC/Cloisite 20A (clay) with exfoliated and intercalated morphologies were prepared and subsequently foamed in a batch setup under different foaming conditions. The foaming parameters were varied to relate the foam cell structure to these parameters and determine the efficiency of clay in producing fine cell foams. A Box Benkhen design approach was used initially to determine the effect of processing parameters on foam cell morphology and also to perform optimization studies. The optimization process helped in identifying the range of operating conditions needed to minimize foam cell sizes. Saturation pressure and temperature and foaming time and temperature are the four processing variables used in these studies. Nanocellular foam cells were effectively generated for the first time in Polypropylene nanocomposites.

References

Fujimoto Y, Ray S, Okamoto M, Ogami A, Yamada K, Ueda K. Well-Controlled Biodegradable Nanocomposite Foams: From Microcellular to Nanocellular. Macromol Rapid Commun 2003; 24: 457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/marc.200390068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200390068

Wagner M, Bastian H, Hachmann P, Meissner J, Kurzbeck S, Münstedtand H, Langouche F. The strain hardening behaviour of linear and long-chain-branched polyolefin melts in extensional flows. Rheologica Acta 2000; 39: 97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003970050010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003970050010

Jahani Y, Barikani M. Influence of nanoclay on rheological properties of polyamide 6/acrylonitrile Foam Application. Iran Polym J 2005; 14: 361.

Chul DFB, Park B, Suh NP. Effect of the pressure drop rate on cell nucleation in continuous processing of microcellular polymers. Polym Eng Sci 1995; 35: 432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760350509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760350509

Ramesh DHRNS, Campbell GA, Numerical and experimental studies of bubble growth during the microcellular foaming process. Polym Eng Sci 2004; 31: 1657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760312305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760312305

Kim WN, Burns CM. Compatibility studies of polystyrene–polybutadiene blends by thermal analysis. J Appl Polym Sci 1986; 32: 2989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.1986.070320112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1986.070320112

Ramesh DHRNS, Campbell GA. The heterogeneous nucleation of microcellular foams assisted by the survival of microvoids in polymers containing low glass transition particles. Part I: Mathematical modeling. Polym Eng Sci 2004; 34: 1698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760342207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760342207

Ray S. Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Progr Polym Sci 2003; 28: 1539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002

Hoppner D, Wendorff J. Investigations of the influence on the phase morphology of pp-epdm-blends on their mechanical properties. Colloid Polym Sci 1990; 268: 500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01410292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410292

Ray S, Bousmina M. Compatibilization efficiency of organoclay in an immiscible polycarbonate/poly (methyl methacrylate) blend. Macromol Rapid Commun 2005; 26. 450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/marc.200400586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200400586

Tjong S, Liu S, Li R. Mechanical properties of injection moulded blends polypropylene with thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer. J Mater Sci 1996; 31: 479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01139167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139167

Yee A, Maxwell M. Mechanical properties of polymer mixtures: effect of Compatibility. J Macromol Sci Part B 1980; 17: 543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222348008212826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222348008212826

Yee A. Mechanical properties of mixtures of two compatible polymers. Polym Eng Sci 1977; 17: 213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760170310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760170310

Barlow J, Paul D. Polymer blends and alloys—a review of selected Considerations. Polym Eng Sci 1981; 21: 985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760211502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760211502

Malik T. Thermal and mechanical characterization of partially miscible blends of poly (ether ether ketone) and polyethersulfone. J Appl Polym Sci 2003; 46: 303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.1992.070460211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1992.070460211

Downloads

Published

2013-03-29

How to Cite

Bhattacharya, S., Gupta, R., & Bhattacharya, S. N. (2013). Optimization of Process Parameters for Generation of Nanocellular Polymer Foams. Journal of Research Updates in Polymer Science, 2(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5995.2013.02.01.6

Issue

Section

Articles