Technological Dimensions of Nearly ZEB Design: Evolving toward a Nearly Zero Energy Oriented Landscape

Authors

  • Filippo Angelucci Department of Architecture, University of Chieti-Pescara, “G. d'Annunzio”, Viale Pindaro, 42 - 65127 Pescara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2017.06.03.1

Keywords:

Nearly ZEB Process, Environmental-Technological Design, Inter-systemic/Trans-scalar Design, Environmental Interfaces, Nearly Zero Energy Oriented Landscape.

Abstract

Today, the implementation framework of Zero Energy Building strategies is characterised by a complex transitional phase. In fact, it is still difficult to achieve completely autonomous buildings, disconnected from any power-supply network.

Despite the negative impact of climate-change and the progressive loss of non-renewable resources on our lifestyles, the global economic-financial crisis, local cultural-technological barriers, and the cost/complexity of design processes keep investment in this area unattractive.

However, there is an intermediate approach that can facilitate a gradual re-direction of building actions through the ZEB logic. It can be identified in the alternative of Near Zero Energy Building (Nearly ZEB or Near Net ZEB).

The Nearly ZEB approach, with its multiplicity of design aspects (i.e. cognitive, analytical, technical, and managerial) may configure a widespread state of progressive transition towards the architectural/inhabitable constructions sought by the 20-20-20 logic, at the scale of the building, the city, and the landscape.

These constructions have lower emissions, produce more energy from renewable sources, consume less non-renewable energy, and can “also†reach the objective of total energy autonomy (ZEB) or Plus Energy.

A twofold operating scenario emerges from this point of view. It is centred on the technological dimensions of designing a Nearly Zero Energy living space by overcoming the traditional concept of a building as a single object.

On the one hand, there is a need for a greater interaction between technological innovations and inhabitable spaces, in a trans-scalar key; design becomes an open process of technological-environmental modifications that addresses the transition towards the status of ZEB.

On the another hand, it becomes fundamental that the relationship between interior and exterior space, both public and private, is increasingly focused on the design of interface-systems in order to harmonise three new levels of relations (city-building, city-land, and building-land) and to configure a Nearly Zero Energy Oriented Landscape.

These aspects emerge from the contributions presented in this special issue on The Technological Dimensions of Nearly Zero Energy Building Design and will be addressed in this essay.

References


[1]Filippi M, Fabrizio E. Il concetto di zero energy building. In: Verso gli edifici a ""energia quasi zero"": le tecnologie dis-ponibili. Atti del convegno. Milano: AICARR 2011; pp. 1-14.
[2]Sartori I, Napolitano A, Marszal AJ, Pless S, Torcellini P, Voss K. Criteria for definition of net zero energy buildings. In: Proceedings of EuroSun 2010: International conference on solar heating, cooling and buildings: 28 September – 1 October 2010. Graz: EuroSun 2010.https://doi.org/10.18086/eurosun.2010.06.21
[3]Torcellini P, Pless S, Deru M, Crawley D. Zero energy buildings: A critical look at the definition. NREL/National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Department of Energy. Springfield: NREL 2006. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/39833.pdf.
[4]Hootman T. Net zero energy design. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons 2013; pp. 1-25.
[5]Tucci F. Design, technology, energy: quality of building and living in nearly zero energy and zero emission architecture. In: Lucarelli MT, Mussinelli E, Trombetta C, Eds. Cluster in progress. The architectural technology network for innovation. Rimini: Maggioli Editore 2016; p. 75.
[6]Angelucci F. editor. La costruzione del paesaggio energetico. Milano: Franco Angeli 2011; pp. 17-48, 65-75.
[7]Friedman Y. L'architecture de survie: Une philosophie de la pauvreté. Paris: Éditions de l’éclat 2003; pp. 59-97.
[8]Stremke S. Designing sustainable energy landscapes. Concepts, principles and procedures. PhD Thesis, Wageningen: Wageningen University 2010; pp. 75-96.
[9]Tiezzi E. Neghentropy against destruction. In: Heimdall’s horn. Citizenship of the earth – A new alliance between peoples, ideas and cultures. Proceedings of XXVIII Pio Manzu International Conference. Rimini: Pio Manzù Research Centre 2002; pp. 111-117.
[10]Tucci F. Design, technology, energy: Quality of building and living in nearly zero energy and zero emission architecture. In: Lucarelli MT, Mussinelli E, Trombetta C, Eds. Cluster in progress. The architectural technology network for innovation. Rimini: Maggioli Editore 2016; pp. 76.
[11]Mulder K. The technological landscape. In: Sijmons D, Hugtenburg J, van Hoorn A, Feddes F, Eds. Landscape and energy. Designing transition. Rotterdam: Nai010 publishers 2014; pp. 368-380.
[12]Vivienne Brophy V, Owen Lewis J. A green Vitruvius. Principles and practice of sustainable architectural design, 2nd ed. London: Earthscan Edition 2011; pp. 3-43.
[13]Habraken NJ. The structure of the ordinary. London: Teicher 1998.
[14]Habash G, Chapotchkine D, Fisher P , Rancourt A, Habash R, Norris W. Sustainable design of a nearly zero energy building facilitated by a smart microgrid. Journal of renewable energy; Volume 2014 (2014), Cairo: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jre/2014/725850/

Downloads

Published

2018-02-28

How to Cite

Angelucci, F. (2018). Technological Dimensions of Nearly ZEB Design: Evolving toward a Nearly Zero Energy Oriented Landscape. Journal of Technology Innovations in Renewable Energy, 6(3), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2017.06.03.1

Issue

Section

Special Issue - TECHNOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF NEAR ZERO ENERGY BUILDING DESIGN. (Part i)