Legal Research Methodology Reposition in Research on Social Science

Authors

  • Agus Budianto Pelita Harapan University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.154

Keywords:

Repositioning, Legal Research, socio legal research

Abstract

A legal researcher must see that research is an activity. The research is not only reading books, principles, doctrines, and regulations but also an activity to find data. Legal research should no longer distinguish between normative research and sociological research, or qualitative and quantitative research. This research method uses focus group discussions as used in qualitative research. The results of the study are that the law was born from the community that the legal system consists of substance, system, and culture. So that legal research that has its characteristics and is different from social science (sui generis) needs to be re-examined in its meaning in research. Related to the use of primary data existence, in socio-legal research requires primary data whose ranking consists of 7 (seven), namely: Dissertation, National and International scientific journal articles, Thesis and Thesis, Interview, Academic Paper, Court Verdict and Case, which how to obtain primary data must be systematic, scientific and rational. So in addition to normative juridical research with the object of research on legal principles, teachings or legal theories, and legal doctrines, legal research needs to reposition primary data in socio-legal research.

References

Acharya S, “Sociological Jurisprudence: A Reference a Functional Approach of Law”, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3442521. p. 3

Afiyanti Y, “Focus Group Discussion (Diskusi Kelompok Terfokus) Sebagai Metode Pengumpulan Data Penelitian Kualitatif”, Jurnal Keperawatan, Vol. 12, No. 1, Maret 2008, hal 58. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v12i1.201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v12i1.201

Bruggink, J.J.H., Refleksi Tentang Hukum, Terjemahan Bernard AriefSidharta, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti, 1999), hal. 25

Hadi S, Metodologi Research, Jilid 1, Yayasan Penerbitan Fakultas Psikologi UGM Yogyakarta, 1986, hlm. 33-35.

Hadjon PM, Argumentasi Hukum, Yogyakarta: Gadjahmada University, 2005), hal. 45

Harususilo YE, “Gratis Akses "E-Journal" dari Kemenristek, Ini Cara danTautannya”, diaksesdari: https://edukasi.kompas.com/ read/2018/08/18/23110551/gratis-akses-e-journal-dari-kemenristek-ini-cara-dan-tautannya?page=allpadatanggal 19 Mei 2020.

KBBI, diaksesdari: https://kbbi.web.id/disertasipadatanggal 20 Mei 2020.

Kelsen H, Pure Theory of Law (TeoriHukum Murni: Dasar-DasarIlmu Hukum Normatif), terjemahanoleh Raisul Muttaqien, (Bandung: Nusa Media, 2008), hal. 105

Miharja M, Khasanah Pemikiran Hukum di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Qiara Media, 2019), hal. 31-32

Nurdiani N, “Teknik Sampling Snowball dalam Penelitian Lapangan”, Jurnal Comtech, Vol. 5, No. 2, Desember 2014, hal. 7. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v5i2.2427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v5i2.2427

Qamar N, Syarif M, dkk, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Methods), (Makassar: Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 2017), hal. 1

Rachmawati IN, “Pengumpulan Data Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif: Wawancara”, Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, Vol. 11, No. 1 – 2007, hal. 9. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v11i1.184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v11i1.184

Rahayu DD, Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum, (Surabaya: Scopindo, 2019), hal. 13

Rahmiati, “Analisa Kendala Internal Mahasiswa Dalam Menulis KaryaIlmiah”, Jurnal Al-Daulah, Vol. 3, No. 2 – Desember 2014, hal. 258

Riset K, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia, diunduhdari: http://sinta2.ristekdikti.go.id/home/faq#ans2 padatanggal 16 Mei 2020

Samekto A, “Menelusuri Akar Pemikiran Hans Kelsen Tentang Stufenbeautheory Dalam Pendekatan Normatif-Filosofis”, Jurnal Hukum Progresif, Vol. 7 No. 1, April 2019, hal. 2 https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.1.1-19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.1.1-19

Sidharta BA, Refleksitentang StrukturIlmu Hukum, (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1999), hal.164-165.

Smits JM, “What is Legal Doctrine? On The Aims And Methods Of Legal-Dogmatic Research”, Maastricht University, 2015. p. 5 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644088

Soekanto S, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta, 1984, hal. 114.

Soemitro RH, Masalah-masalah Sosiologi Hukum, (Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1984), hal. 110.

Solimun, Rinaldo AAA, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Prespektif Sistem (Mengungkap Novelty dan Memenuhi Validitas Penelitian), (Malang: UB Press, 2020), hal. vi

Suprayitno A, Pedoman Penyusunan Dan Penulisan JurnalIlmiah Bagi Guru Besar, (Yogyakarta: Deepublish, AnggotaIkapi, 2019), hal. 90

Tripa S, Diskursus Metodedalam Penelitian Hukum, (Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing, 2019), hal. 23-25

Tutik TT, “Hakikat KeilmuanIlmu Hukum Ditinjau Dari Sudut FilsafatIlmudan TeoriIlmu Hukum”, MimbarHukum, Vol. 24, No. 3, Oktober 2012, hal. 444

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

Budianto, A. . (2022). Legal Research Methodology Reposition in Research on Social Science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1339–1346. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.154

Issue

Section

Articles