Current Problems of Modern Organization of Career Guidance for Students with Special Educational Needs at University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.01.11Keywords:
Career guidance, vocational education, employment, youth with special educational needs.Abstract
The article deals with the organization of career guidance for individuals with special educational needs in the Republic of Kazakhstan. This paper considers the professional orientation of young people with disabilities based on the theoretical analysis of the current state of career guidance organization. The authors pay special attention to the problem of effective career guidance activities, which largely depend on the comprehensive and consistent nature of these activities and involve all the aspects of the educational process.
References
Akatov LI. Social rehabilitation of children with disabilities. Psychological foundations: teaching manual. - M.: Humanitarian publishing center. Lagos 2009.
Goncharova OL. Pedagogical support of students’ professional self-determination of in the process of continuity of primary and secondary vocational education. Vocational education. Capital. Research in Education 2009; 2: 7-11.
Gordievskaya Ye. Professional test in the process of professional orientation of individuals with disabilities as a means of their professional self-determination 2003.
Yevladova YeV, Loginova LG. Organization of additional education for children: tutorial 2003; p. 260, ISBN: 5-691-00885-4
Svistunova YeV, Ananiev YeV. Comprehensive approach to career guidance and professional counselling of adolescents with disabilities. Svistunova YeV, Ananiev YeV. Systems Psychology and Sociology 2011; No. 4.
Abulkhanova KA. The Russian problem of freedom, loneliness, humility. Psychological Journal 1999; 20(5): 5-14.
Abulkhanova-Slavskaya KA. Activity and personality psychology. M .: Nauka 1960; p. 335.
Abulkhanova-Slavskaya KA. Personal mechanisms of regulation of activity. Problems of personality psychology: Soviet-Finnish Symposium M: Progress 1982; pp. 70 72.
Avaluev NB. Criteria approach to assessing the effectiveness of educational activities of a teacher. Diss. Cand. ped sciences. - SPb., 2003; 169.
Asmolov AG. Tolerance in the public consciousness of Russia. - M.: IARAU 1998.
Adorno T. Studies of an authoritarian personality 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220986.n8
Adorno TW, Frenkel-Brunswik E, Levinson DJ, Sanford RN. The Authoritarian Personality. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers 1950.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991; 50(2): 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 1977; 84(5): 888-918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.84.5.888
Bratchenko SL. Interpersonal dialogue and its main attributes. Psychology with a human face: a humanistic perspective in post-Soviet psychology. Chelyabinsk Oblast: Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University 1997; pp. 201 222.
Dasgupta P. An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford: Clarendon 1993.
Duch RM, Gibson JL. Putting up with Fascists in Western Europe: A comparative, cross-level analysis of political tolerance. The Western Political Quarterly 1992; 45(1): 237-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/448773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299204500116
Duckitt J. Personality and prejudice. In Dovidiom JF, Glick P, Rudman LA, Eds. On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell 2005; pp. 395-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773963.ch24
Golebiowska EA. Gender gap in political tolerance. Political Behavior 1999; 21(1): 43-66. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023396429500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023396429500
González R, Brown R. Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology 2003; 33(2): 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.140