Students’ Humanistic Position Formation in the Educational Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.25Keywords:
Humanism, position, training, students, university.Abstract
Objective: The student's humanistic position is not only the result of the teacher's personal influence but also a controlled process. As a result of the implementation of this process, the student receives an understanding of what should relate to the humanistic process and the humanistic function of society.
Background: The basis for the formation of humanism for all participants in the students' educational process is determined either by the teacher's position or by the installation in the pedagogical process. So, any impact on the part of the teacher can be perceived as an exceptional factor of influencing the student's personality, which can be perceived as a compulsory education requirement.
Method: Assessment of pedagogical effectiveness was carried out by means of an expert survey. Diagnostic and processing of empirical data was carried out according to the methodology for assessing the importance of each individual requirement for the proposed educational materials.
Results: The study examines the components that form the student’s humanistic position on the basis of the traditional components of the formation of the pedagogical teaching strategy. The practical significance of the study is determined by the fact that it is possible to implement the concept of the formation of active skills in students during certain actions and the formation of other humanitarian positions.
Conclusion: The study shows that the level of formation of the students' humanistic position concerning all participants in the educational process depends on updating the educational process of training specialists based on the developed theoretical and methodological foundations.
References
Weiner B. Humanistic theory and personal constructs. In Human motivation. New York: Springer New York 1985; pp. 407-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5092-0_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5092-0_9
Aloni N. Between the classical and post-modern: milestones and central approaches in humanistic education. In Enhancing humanity: The philosophical foundations of humanistic education. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 2003a; pp. 9-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6168-4_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6168-4_1
Kato M. Significance of the rhetorical and humanistic tradition for education today. Asia Pacific Education Review 2014; 15(1): 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9297-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9297-2
Suransky C. Humanistic education for teaching in a globalising world. In M Walker, M Wilson-Strydom (Eds.). Socially just pedagogies, capabilities and quality in higher education: Global perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK 2017; pp. 109-28. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55786-5_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55786-5_6
Parkinson GHR. Humanistic education: some philosophical considerations. In Straughan R, Wilson J, editors. Philosophers on education. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK 1987; pp. 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08106-6_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08106-6_7
Aloni N. Education towards humanistic morality in an era of value crisis. In Enhancing humanity: The philosophical foundations of humanistic education. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 2003b; pp. 119-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6168-4_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6168-4_3
Kwak D-J. A role of doing philosophy in a humanistic approach to teacher education. In MA Peters, B Cowie, I Menter (Eds.). A companion to research in teacher education. Singapore: Springer Singapore 2017; pp. 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_5
Bakker D. Humanistic teaching in practice. In W Veugelers (Ed.) Education and humanism: Linking autonomy and humanity. Rotterdam: SensePublishers 2011; pp. 145-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-577-2_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-577-2_11
PourAli P, SeifNaraghi M, Naderi E. Humanistic education and students’ educational motivation in Tehran primary schools. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 2017; 15(2): 312-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-016-9703-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-016-9703-1
Peters HC, Rivas M. The self-model of humanistic supervision. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 2018; 40(3): 237-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-018-9323-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-018-9323-5
Veugelers W. A humanist perspective on moral development and citizenship education. In W Veugelers (Ed.). Education and humanism: Linking autonomy and humanity. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers 2011; pp. 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-577-2_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-577-2_2
Dierksmeier C. Toward a humanistic paradigm? In: Reframing economic ethics: The philosophical foundations of humanistic management. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2016; pp. 103-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32300-8_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32300-8_5
Aloni N. Humanistic education in the test of current events. In: Enhancing humanity: The philosophical foundations of humanistic education. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 2003c; pp. 173-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6168-4_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6168-4_4
Brown SI. Towards humanistic mathematics education. In: Bishop AJ, Clements K, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Laborde C (Eds.). International handbook of mathematics education: Part 1. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 1996; pp. 1289-1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_37
Fabian B, Vierhaus R. The calling and condition of the humanistic disciplines. Minerva 1979; 17(4): 549-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101903
Gregersen F, Køppe S. A normative theory of humanistic knowledge. Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 1989; 20(1): 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801401
Letkowitz J. From humanitarian to humanistic work psychology: the morality of business. In: Carr SC, MacLachlan M, Furnham A, editors. Humanitarian work psychology. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK 2012; pp. 103-25. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015228_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015228_5
Schwarz DR. The case for humanistic formalism. In: The transformation of the English novel, 1890–1930: Studies in Hardy, Conrad, Joyce, Lawrence, Forster and Woolf. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK 1995; pp. 141-76. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379336_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379336_8
Wilde L. Humanistic ethics. In: Erich fromm and the quest for solidarity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US 2004; pp. 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07511-6_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07511-6_3
Zilsel E, Raven D, Krohn W, Cohen RS. The methods of humanism. In: Raven D, Krohn W, Cohen RS, editors. The social origins of modern science. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 2003; pp. 22-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4142-0_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4142-0_3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
