Psychology of the Subject's Self-Regulatory Activity in the Context of Hybrid Warfare

Authors

  • Nataliia Makarchuk Izmail State University of Humanities, Izmail, Ukraine
  • Liliia Kulinenko Izmail State University of Humanities, Izmail, Ukraine
  • Olga Vasylieva Izmail State University of Humanities, Izmail, Ukraine
  • Olga Zhurkova Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Liudmila Makarchuk Izmail State University of Humanities, Izmail, Ukraine
  • Elena Mozoliuk Khmelnytskyi Humanitarian and Pedagogical Academy, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.01.12

Keywords:

Self-regulatory activity, psyche, hybrid warfare, perversion, neurosis

Abstract

Objective: The main tasks of this study are as follows: to substantiate the interdependence of perversion as a form of violence and the human ego in the context of hybrid warfare; to prove the existence of perversion as a form of violence against a person in the context of hybrid warfare in Ukraine (personal perversion); to describe the alteration of ego states as conditions for effective human self-regulatory activity in the context of hybrid warfare.

Background: Hybrid warfare, including the Ukrainian-Russian conflict, as a phenomenon, has been widely studied both abroad and in Ukraine. However, there are very few works on the psychological impact of such a war. There are currently no works on disorders of human self-regulatory activity in the context of hybrid warfare, which makes the study unique and relevant.

Method: The study used a combination of various methods, in particular, structural-clinical interviews, psychological counseling and therapeutic meetings, data analysis. Data were collected for 2014-2020. The total number of participants was 55 people aged 25 to 63 years, with 70% female and 30% male.

Results: The latent tension and denial of hybrid warfare result in a gradual increase of neurotization, which is in 95% of cases passes into a neurosis state with concomitant manifestations of symptoms. There is also a deterioration in psychological well-being and phylogenetic disorders (erogenous dysfunction in men, uncontrolled neurotic masturbation in women). Disorders of the mental level of self-regulation determine the manifestation of the mental content of perversion, in which perversion takes on the character of intrapersonal functioning.

Conclusion: The combination of disorders of the physical, mental and personal levels of the self-regulatory activity of the psyche increased perverse tendencies in social and political life, which provoked a high rate of psychotization of the entire society and an increase in deficit characterological manifestations of each individual.

References

Makarchuk N, Khovanova O, Khyrna T. Specificity of psychological assistance for children with special needs in overcoming the consequences of staying in a zone of military conflict. Special Child: Learning and Education 2014; 4: 68-74.

Stoller RJ. Perversion: The erotic form of hatred. Izhevsk: ERGO, 2016.

Van Puyvelde D. Hybrid war – does it even exist? [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2015/05/07/hybrid-war-does-it-even-exist/index.html

Hybrid warfare: concept, essence, features, and counteraction methods [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: https://militaryarms.ru/geopolitika/gibridnaya-vojna/

Makarchuk NO. Personal self-regulation of adolescents with mental disorders. Kyiv: Feniks, 2014.

Bogner M. On the increase in civilian casualties in the conflict zone of eastern Ukraine. Statement by Ms. Matilda Bogner, Head of the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org.ua/en/information-centre/news/4873-on-the-increase-in-civilian-casualties-in-the-conflict-zone-of-eastern-ukraine-statement-by-ms-matilda-bogner-head-of-the-un-human-rights-monitoring-mission-in-ukraine

The UN has counted civilian and combatant casualties of hostilities in Donbass [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/oon-zvit-ghertvy-donbas/30272212.html

Hoffman F. Hybrid Warfare and Challenges. JFQ 2009; 52: 34-39.

Jøsok Ø, Lugo R, Knox BJ, Sütterlin S, Helkala K. Self-Regulation and Cognitive Agility in Cyber Operations. Frontiers in Psychology 2019; 10: 875. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00875

Daskalov K. Hybrid Warfare and the Challenge It Poses to the Psychological Resilience Training in the Bulgarian Military. Information & Security: An International Journal 2018; 39: 197-205. https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.3917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.3917

Miller WR, Brown J. Self-regulation as a conceptual basis for the prevention and treatment of addictive behaviors. In: Heather N, Miller WR, Greeley J. (Eds.). Self-Control and the Addictive Behaviours. Sydney, Australia: Maxwell Macmillan, 1991; pp. 3-79.

Diab M, Peltonen K, Qouta SR, Palosaari E, Punamäki R-L. Can functional emotion regulation protect children's mental health from war trauma? A Palestinian study. International Journal of Psychology 2019; 54(1): 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12427

Cheung-Blunden V, Blunden B. The emotional construal of war: Anger, fear and other negative emotions. Peace and Conflict. Journal of Peace Psychology 2008; 14(2): 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10781910802017289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10781910802017289

Halperin E, Sharvit K, Gross J. Emotions, and emotion regulation in conflicts. In: D. Bar-Tal (Ed). Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: Social psychological perspective. New York: Psychology Press, 2010.

Horowitz DL. Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.

Doroshko M, Balyuk V. Russia's hybrid war against Ukraine after the Revolution of Dignity. Kyiv: Nika-Center, 2018.

Misko V. World Hybrid War: Ukrainian Front. Monograph. Kyiv: NISD, 2017.

Seheda SP, Shevchuk VP. Russia's hybrid war against Ukraine: a historical dimension. Nauka I Oborona 2019; 1: 31-35. https://doi.org/10.33099/2618-1614-2019-6-1-31-35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33099/2618-1614-2019-6-1-31-35

Magda Y. The start of RF’s Hybrid Aggression Against Ukraine: The Point of Bifurcation. European Political and Law Discourse 2018; 5(2): 41-47.

Perepelitsa G. Ukraine - Russia: War in Coexistence. Kiyv: Stilos, 2017.

Smola L. Information and psychological component of "hybrid" war. Collection of works “Russia’s Hybrid War – A challenge and a Threat to Europe”. Kyiv: Razumkov Center, 2016; 53-57.

Mateyuk O. Information and psychological component of hybrid armed struggle. Collection of Scientific Papers of The National Academy of the State Border Service of Ukraine: Psychological Sciences Series 2015; 1: 109-116.

Yuzov І, Patsek P. Information and the psychological influence of the enemy and counteraction to him in the conditions of conducting hybrid wars. Science and Technology of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine 2020; 3(40): 61-68. https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2020.40.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2020.40.07

Published

2021-02-24

How to Cite

Makarchuk, N. ., Kulinenko, L. ., Vasylieva, O. ., Zhurkova, O. ., Makarchuk, L. ., & Mozoliuk, E. . (2021). Psychology of the Subject’s Self-Regulatory Activity in the Context of Hybrid Warfare. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 9(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.01.12

Issue

Section

General Articles