Forced Leadership as a Social Psychological Phenomenon in Professionally Successful Women Scientists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.04.7Keywords:
Leadership, professionally successful women, women scientists, women's leadershipAbstract
In today's world, women are increasingly taking the place of leaders, so they have to be active, focused, resistant to stress, have a high level of self-regulation, and be able to work in a team. So, we can see how women are sometimes forced to become leaders in difficult life circumstances. Due to persistence, self-education, determination, they work in leadership positions and demonstrate masculine personality traits. The study aimed to study the psychological characteristics of women scientists who hold high positions in educational establishments - vice-rector, dean, and department head. We hypothesized that the professional success of women scientists depends on the level of their potential leadership skills. The study involved 75 women from higher education institutions who successfully work as vice-rectors, deans, heads of departments. All of them have the degree of doctors of philosophy from various scientific fields and combined scientific activity with managerial activity. Analysis of the results of empirical research showed that a high level of leadership skills determines the professional success of 37% of women studied, but 63% of women scientists have other determinants of professional success. Differences in indicators were identified, and three groups of women were characterized depending on the level of development of their leadership abilities. In groups of women with a medium and low level of leadership skills, the main determinants of professional success are the focus on real-life circumstances, high level of development of stable emotional and volitional sphere, voluntary self-regulation, self-control in difficult situations, emotional stability. Women who have achieved professional success, not on the basis of potential leadership abilities, form a socially determined personal quality - forced leadership, which we tend to consider as a social psychological phenomenon, which is based on the ability to adapt to living conditions in situations requiring a person to choose against own individual psychological features, namely to become a leader, to cultivate the traits inherent in a true leader.
References
Shultz KG. The impact of leadership development programming on the career pathways of females in higher education 2019.
Madsen SR. Women and leadership in higher education: Learning and advancement in leadership programs. Advances in Developing Human Resources 2012; 14(1): 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422311429668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422311429668
Chanana K. Women and leadership: Strategies of gender inclusion in institutions of higher education in India. In Strategies for Supporting Inclusion and Diversity in the Academy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham 2020; pp. 141-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43593-6_8
Oleksiyenko OH, Martsyniak-Dorosh OM, Mishyn SV, Buryanovatiy OM, Yakymchuk BA. Impact of Convergence of Smart-Technology as Compared to Traditional Methodological Tools on Fostering Cognitive Aspects of Leadership Competencies in the Process of Vocational Training of Students. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment 2019; 7(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2019.07.01.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2019.07.01.1
Alexandra Symonds MD. Neurotic Dependency in Successful Women. Journal of American Academy of Psychoanalysis 1976; 4(1): 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.1.1976.4.1.95 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.1.1976.4.1.95
Clance PR, Imes S. The Imposter Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention. Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice Volume 1978; 15(3): 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006
Reavley MA, Lituchy TR. Successful women entrepreneurs: a six-country analysis of self-reported determinants of success – more than just dollars and cents. Int. J. Entrepreneurship and Small Business 2008; 5(3/4): 272-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2008.017304
Globally the Share of Women in Senior Management is Increasing Incrementally. Aug 11, 2020. URL: [https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-management/]
Social psychology: key ideas / R Baron, D Byrne, B Johnson. Spb. Piter 2003; 428.
Ngunjiri FW, Hernandez KAC. Problematizing authentic leadership: A collaborative autoethnography of immigrant women of color leaders in higher education. Advances in Developing Human Resources 2017; 19(4): 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422317728735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422317728735
Moodly AL, Toni N. Do institutional cultures serve as impediments for women’s advancement towards leadership in South African higher education? South African Journal of Higher Education 2019; 33(3): 176-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/33-3-3137
Wheaton MM, Kezar A. Interlocking systems of oppression: Women navigating higher education leadership. In Research Anthology on Challenges for Women in Leadership Roles. IGI Global 2021; pp. 766-788. 410 Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 2021, Volume 9, No. 4 Olha et al. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8592-4.ch042
Eagly Alice H. Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist 1997; 52(12): 1380-3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.52.12.1380.b
The Anatomy of an Entrepreneur Are Successful Women Entrepreneurs Different From Men? J McGrath Cohoon, Vivek Wadhwa Lesa Mitchell 2010.
Bartol Kathryn M, Martin David C. Management / M. Kathryn Bartol, C. David Martin. – Div: McGraw Hill, 1994; p. 832.
Kapranova MV, Kostyrya SS. Psychological features of professional career of women managers of business structures. Modern social psychology: theoretical approaches and applied research 2011; 3(12): 92-101.
Morán MJB, Echeverría ID, Turrado TF, Portolés CM. Life paths of successful women scientists in Spain. Géneros 2014; 3(1): 351-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4471/generos.2014.33
Tevis TL, Pifer M, Baker VL. Women Higher Education Administrators: Approaches to Leadership in Times of Crisis. In Women and Leadership in Higher Education During Global Crises. IGI Global 2021; pp. 36-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6491-2.ch003
Allen TG, Flood CT. The Experiences of Women in Higher Education: Who Knew There Wasn't a Sisterhood?. Leadership and Research in Education 2018; 4: 10-27.
Thomas S. Women in Higher Education Administration Leadership and the Role of Institutional Support. In Research Anthology on Challenges for Women in Leadership Roles. IGI Global 2021; 282-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8592-4.ch016
Chaldini R, Kenrick D, Neuberg S. Social psychology. Understand others to understand yourself. Spb 2002; 256.
Bendas TV. Gender psychology: teaching. textbook, SPb: Peter 2009; 430.
Bendas TV. Gender psychology of leadership. Orenburg: IPK OGU 2000; 167
Bendas TV. Psychology of leadership: gender and ethnic aspects. SPb 2002; 56.
Bendas TV. Prospects for the development of gender psychology of leadership in the world of modern scientific trends. Modern social psychology: theoretical approaches and applied research 2011; 3(12): 85-92.
Nurzhanbayeva Z, Aidarov B, Baltabekova A, Makhmudov G, Kamalov Y, Seisen N. Semantic Guidelines and Conceptual Basis of a Social Education Teacher Professional Mobility in the Pedagogical Science. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment 2020; 8(3): 560-566. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.33
Syzdykbayeva AD, Mambetalina AS, Nuradinov AS, Kurmanbekova MB, Kabylbekova ZB. Collaborative Environment as a Means of Forming Success of a Future Teacher of Elementary Classes in Project Activity. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment 2020; 8(3): 370-376. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.13
Didenkulova I, Avellis G. Role Models for Mobile Women Scientists. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts 2020; 15490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-15490
Eric A. Landis, Deborah Hill, Maurice R. Harvey A Synthesis of Leadership Theories and Styles 100 Journal of Management Policy and Practice 2014; 15(2).
Amanchukwu RN, Stanley GJ, Ololube NP. Review of Leadership Theories, Principles and Styles and Their Relevance to Educational Management 2015; 5(1): 6-14. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.mm.20150501.02
Abalkhail JM. Women and leadership: Challenges and opportunities in Saudi higher education. Career Development International 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-2016-0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-2016-0029
Burkinshaw P, White K. Fixing the women or fixing universities: Women in HE leadership. Administrative Sciences 2017; 7(3): 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7030030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7030030
Aiston SJ, Yang Z. Absent data, absent women: Gender and higher education leadership. Policy Futures in Education 2017; 15(3): 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317716298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317716298
Johnson HL. Pipelines, pathways, and institutional leadership: An update on the status of women in higher education 2017.
Chin JL, Ladha A, Li V. Women’s leadership within a global perspective. In: C. B Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, & K. F. Wyche (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of the psychology of women: Perspectives on women's private and public lives. American Psychological Association 2018; pp. 565-581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000060-030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000060-030
Rini M. Where Women Scientists Are the Majority. Physics 2021; 14: 35. https://doi.org/10.1103/Physics.14.35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/Physics.14.35
Chapple A, Ziebland S. Challenging explanations for the lack of senior women in science? Reflections from successful women scientists at an elite British University. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 2018; 9(3): 298-315.
Pietri ES, Johnson IR, Ozgumus E, Young AI. Maybe she is relatable: Increasing women’s awareness of gender bias encourages their identification with women scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2018; 42(2): 192-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317752643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317752643
Moodly AL, Toni NM. Re-imagining higher education leadership– in conversation with South African female deputy vicechancellors 2017. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v35i2.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v35i2.12
Bachtold LM, Werner EE. Personality characteristics of women scientists. Psychological Reports 1972; 31(2): 391-396. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1972.31.2.391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1972.31.2.391
Longman KA. perspectives on women’s higher education leadership from around the world 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8030035
Alotaibi FT. Saudi Women and Leadership: Empowering Women as Leaders in Higher Education Institutions. Open Journal of Leadership 2020; 9(03): 156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2020.93010
Fetterolf J, Eagly AH. Do young women expect gender equality in their future lives? An answer from a possible selves experiment. Sex Roles 2011; 65(1-2): 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9981-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9981-9
Moodly A, Toni NM. Accessing higher education leadership: Towards a framework for women’s professional development. South African Journal of Higher Education 2017; 31(3): 138-153. https://doi.org/10.208535/31-3-917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/31-3-917