Doodly-Based Multimedia Instructional Intervention and Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Students with Learning Disabilities in Educational Technology

Authors

  • Idorenyin Edet Johnson Educational Technology Department, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
  • Lawrence Nkpang Ekwok Department of Mass Communication, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
  • Glory Augustine Achua Department of Mass Communication, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
  • Mayen Ndaro Igajah Department of Library and Information Science, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
  • Catherine Nyong Tawo Department of Continuing Education & Development Studies, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
  • Francis Fabian Akpa-Inyang Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2025.13.04.2

Keywords:

Doodly-based multimedia instructions, multimedia instructions, learning disabilities, academic achievement, educational technology, undergraduate students, gender

Abstract

Traditional instructional strategies may not provide the essential elements necessary for students with learning disabilities (LDs) to learn effectively. This ultimately leads to decreased motivation and underachievement. Since Doodly-based multimedia has been scientifically proven to enhance learning outcomes, one wonders if such effects could be replicated on the academic achievement of students with LDs. The study explored the impact of Doodly-based multimedia instructional intervention (DBMII) on the academic achievement of undergraduate students with LDs in Educational Technology (EdTech). The research employed a 2x2 quasi-experimental factorial design, with pre- and post-tests to explore the effects of DBMII. The census sampling technique was used to draw a sample of 38 (22 males and 16 females) third-year special education students with confirmed cases of LDs. The data collection used the Educational Technology Achievement Test (ETAT). The validation was conducted by three specialists and had a reliability coefficient of 0.82 using the Kuder-Richardson 21 formula, before it was administered, marked, scored, coded, and analyzed. Analysis of Co-Variance (ANCOVA) was employed to test the hypotheses, setting the significance threshold at the 0.05 level. The findings revealed a statistically significant beneficial effect of DBMII on the academic achievement of undergraduate students with learning disabilities in EdTech. Also, gender did not significantly influence educational achievement, and no interaction effects between gender and Doodly-based multimedia instructions were observed. It was concluded that Doodly-based multimedia instructions have a statistically significant beneficial effect on the academic achievement of undergraduate students with LDs in EdTech, without any significant influence of gender.

References

Johnson IE, Ofoegbu T, Asogwa UD, Offiong AEA, Imoke JE, Abanyam V, et al. Comparing the academic achievement of students taught EdTech with Doodly-created multimedia instructions in classroom and online learning environments. Ianna J Interdiscip Stud 2024; 6(1): 161-77.

Bellacicco R, Biagiotti G, Moriña A, Torre E. Moving towards inclusive lecturers in higher education: Experiences and perceptions of Italian disabled graduates. Disabil Soc 2025; 4(3): 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2025.2466474

Swanson H. Information processing theory and learning disabilities: An overview. J Learn Disabil. 1987; 20(1): 3-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948702000102

Mayer RE. Multimedia Learning. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.003

Woofresh. Doodly review: Is this video creator software worth it? [Internet]. Woofresh Publishers; 2025 Feb 4 [cited 2025 Jul 4]. Available from: http://woofresh.com/doodly-review/

Park C, Kim D, Cho S, Han H. Adopting multimedia technology for learning and gender difference. Comput Hum Behav 2018; 10(1): 92-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.029

Heo M, Toomey N. Learning with multimedia: The effects of gender, type of multimedia learning resources, and spatial ability. Comput Educ.2020; 146: 103747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103747

Johnson IE, Offiong AEA, Edu GO, Ekwok LN, Sanda FA, Tawo CN, et al. Effects of Doodly-created instructional multimedia environments on academic self-efficacy of undergraduate EdTech students. Ianna J Interdiscip Stud 2025; 7(1): 71-83.

Bano S, Yusuf S. Role of learning disabilities in academic performance among students: Significance of demographic variables. J Prof Appl Psychol 2023; 4(1): 333-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52053/jpap.v4i3.193

Nwosu O, Ndanwu AI. Interaction effect of gender and teaching method on academic achievement and interest of students in electronic libraries course in federal tertiary institutions in Anambra State, Nigeria. J Appl Inf Sci Technol 2020; 13(1): 288-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47524/lipr.v2i1.6

Cortiella C, Horowitz SH. The state of learning disabilities: Understanding the 1 in 5 [Internet]. National Center for Learning Disabilities; 2021 Jul 16 [cited 2025 Jul 6]. Available from: https://www.ncld.org/research/state-of-learning-disabilities/

Sasidharan D. Understanding the causes of dysgraphia: A review study. Int J Manag Technol Soc Sci 2025; 10(1): 230-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0384

DuPaul GJ, Power TJ, Anastopoulos AD, Reid R. ADHD Rating Scale—5 for Children and Adolescents: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretation. New York: Guilford Publications; 2018.

Ilesanmi OP. Effects of peer tutoring strategy on academic achievement of senior secondary school students in technical drawing in Nigeria. Br J Educ Soc Behav Sci 2017; 19(1): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2017/30419

Yavuz C. Gender variance and educational psychology: Implications for practice. Educ Psychol Pract 2016; 32(1): 229-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2016.1205475

Smaldino SE, Lowther DL, Mims C, Russell JD. Instructional Technology and Media for Learning. 12th ed. New York: Pearson; 2019.

Lomellini A, Lowenthal P, Snelson C, Trespalacios J. Accessible and inclusive online learning in higher education: A review of literature. J Comput High Educ 2025; 37(1): 1306-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09424-2

Nkok E, Enang A. Interaction effect of gender and teaching methods on students’ interest, achievement and retention in sexual reproduction in plant students in secondary schools in Akwa Ibom State. Int J Innov Soc Sci Educ Res 2022; 10(1): 56-65.

Obodo A, Ani M. Interaction effect of gender and teaching method on academic achievement and interest of basic science students in upper basic education. J Sci Educ 2023; 4(1): 269-81.

Adeosun M, Yara P. Effect of interactive video variations on secondary school biology students’ academic achievement in ecology in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. Res J Mass Commun Inf Technol 2025; 11(5): 47-54.

Qazi A, Hasan N, Abayomi-Alli O, Hardaker G, Scherer R, Sarker Y, et al. Gender differences in information and communication technology use and skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educ Inf Technol.2022; 27: 4225-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10775-x

Nwoke B, Ajuzie N. Multimedia instructional approach and gender equity in mathematics achievement among secondary school students. J Cudimac 2021; 9(1): 54-61.

Stranger Show. Doodly review: Software to make animation videos [Internet] 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 6]. Available from: https: //strangershow.com/doodly-review/

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

Johnson, I. E. ., Ekwok, L. N. ., Achua, G. A. ., Igajah, M. N. ., Tawo, C. N. ., & Akpa-Inyang, F. F. . (2025). Doodly-Based Multimedia Instructional Intervention and Academic Achievement of Undergraduate Students with Learning Disabilities in Educational Technology. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 13(4), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2025.13.04.2

Issue

Section

General Articles