Contextual Integration of Causal Coherence in People with Down Syndrome: Evidence from Figurative Comprehension
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2016.04.01.7Keywords:
Down syndrome, causal inference, weak central coherence.Abstract
Contextual integration is seldom explored in people with Down syndrome (DS). This study aimed to investigate this ability by comparing causal inferences made by people with DS who were presented with homonyms embedded within sentences and asked to choose which of three interpretations (figurative meaning, literal meaning, or unrelated meaning) was correct. Accuracy was the dependent variable. Each homonym was presented in a scenario familiar to the participants. The results revealed that the participants with DS were the least accurate in responding to figurative meanings and erred most compared to matched controls in chronological age and mental age. It was concluded that people with DS were developmentally delayed in causal inferences and weak central coherence is indeed a syndrome-general phenotype across populations with developmental disorders.
References
Frith U. Autism: Explaining the Enigma. Oxford, UK: Blackwell 1989.
Nerlich B, Clarke DD. Contextual competence: Its growth, use and loss. Studia Anglica Resoviensia: International English Studies Journal, Grzegorz A. Kleparski (Ed.), 1/2002. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego 2002; pp. 64-78.
Brown HH, Michel D, Powelson J, Gardner H. Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients. Brain and Language 1983; 18: 20-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(83)90002-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(83)90002-0
Hsu CF, Karmiloff-Smith A, Tzeng O, Chin RT, Wang HC. Semantic knowledge in Williams syndrome: Insights from comparing behavioural and brain processes in false memory tasks. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning 2007; 6: 48-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2007.4354074
Hsu CF. Contextual integration of causal coherence in people with Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2013b; 34(10): 3332-3342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.031
Grice SJ, Spratling MW, Karmiloff-Smith A, Halit H, Csibra G, de Haan M, Johnson MH. Disordered visual processing and oscillatory brain activity in autism and Williams Syndrome. NeuroReport 2001; 12(12): 2697-2700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200108280-00021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200108280-00021
Hsu CF, Tzeng Ovid JL. Contextual effect in people with Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2011; 32(2): 781-787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.001
Hsu CF. Is the contextual effect weak in people with Williams syndrome? An investigation of information integration ability using pictures. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2013a; 34(3): 932-939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.11.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.11.015
Hsu CF. Cross-modal contextual coherence of semantic integration in people with Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2013c; 34(12): 4319-4327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.002
Hsu CF. Modality effect of contextual integration in people with Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2014b; 35(7): 1571-1578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.049
Hsu CF. Cross-domain investigation of weak central coherence in people with Williams syndrome: Asymmetrical brain and behavioral performances in verbal and nonverbal domains. In Porter, O. H. (Ed.), Semantic Memory: Neurobiology, Disorders and Therapeutic Strategies for Improvement, New York: Nova Science Publishers 2014c; pp. 71-82.
Hsu CF, Chen JY. Deviant neural correlates of configural detection in facial processing of people with Williams syndrome. Bulletin of Special Education 2014a; 39(1): 61-84.
Karmiloff-Smith A, Thomas M, Annaz D, Humphreys K, Ewing S, Brace N, van Duuren M, Pike G, Grice S, Campbell R. Exploring the Williams syndrome face-processing debate: the importance of building developmental trajectories. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2004; 45(7): 1258-1274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00322.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00322.x
Mills DL, Alvarez TD, George MS, Appelbaum LG, Bellugi U, Neville H. Electrophysiological Studies of Face Processing in Williams Syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000; 12(supplement 1): 47-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892900561977 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900561977
Hickey F, Hickey E, Summar KL. Medical update for children with Down syndrome for the pediatrician and family practitioner. Advances in Pediatrics 2012; 59(1): 137-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yapd.2012.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yapd.2012.04.006
Rachidi M, Lopes C. Mental retardation and associated neurological dysfunctions in Down syndrome: A consequence of dysregulation in critical chromosome 21 genes and associated molecular pathways. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology 2008; 12: 168-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.08.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.08.010
Jarrold C, Baddeley AD. Short-term memory for verbal and visuospatial information in Down’s syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 1997; 2(2): 101-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135468097396351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135468097396351
Abbeduto L, Pavetto M, Kesin E, Weissman MD, Karadottir S, O’Brien A, Cawthon S. The linguistic and cognitive profile of Down syndrome: Evidence from a comparison with fragile X syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice 2001; 7(1): 9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3104/reports.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3104/reports.109
Bellugi U, Lichtenberger L, Jones W, Lai Z, George M. The neurocognitive profile of Williams syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000; 12: 7-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892900561959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900561959
Yang YY, Conners FA, Merrill EC. Visuo-spatial ability in individuals with Down syndrome: Is it really a strength? Research in Developmental Disabilities 2014; 35: 1473-1500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.04.002
Laws G, Lawrence L. Spatial representation in the drawings of children with Down’s syndrome and its relationship to language and motor development: A preliminary investigation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 2001; 19: 453-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151001166119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/026151001166119
Ypsilanti A, Grouios G. Linguistic profile of individuals with Down syndrome: Comparing the linguistic performance of three developmental disorders. Child Neuropsychology 2008; 14: 148-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09297040701632209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040701632209
Chen RH, Chen CY. Wechsler Scale Intelligence Test for Children (4th ed.). Taipei: Bookstore for Chinese Behavioral Science (Chinese version) 2010.
Chen RH, Chen CY. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). Taipei: Bookstore for Chinese Behavioral Science (Chinese version) 2002.
Kuperberg GR, Paczynski M, Ditman T. Establishing causal coherence across sentences: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011; 23(5): 1230-1246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21452
Singer M, Ferreira F. Inferring consequences in story comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1983; 22: 437-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90282-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90282-7
Santos A, Deruelle C. Verbal peaks and visual valleys in theory of mind ability in Williams syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2009; 39: 651-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0669-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0669-0
Happé FGE. Central coherence and theory of mind in autism: Reading homographs in context. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1997; 15(1): 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1997.tb00721.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1997.tb00721.x
Giaouri S, Alevriadou A. Second-order false belief attribution in children with non-specific intellectual disabilities and Down syndrome: Social-cognitive profile research and educational planning challenges. Bulletin of the University of Ploesti, Educational Series 2010; 62(2).
Roch M, Florit E, Levorato C. The role of linguistic context in deriving word meanings in individuals with Down Syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2013; 34: 605-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.014
Roch M, Florit E, Levorato C. The advantage of reading over listening text comprehension in Down syndrome: What is the role of verbal memory? Research in Developmental Disabilities 2012; 33: 890-899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.11.002
Smith E, Jarrold C. Grouping, semantic relation and imagery effects in individuals with Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2014; 35: 3162-3174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.061
Carney DPJ, Henry LA, Messer DJ, Danielsson H, Brown JH, Ronnberg J. Using developmental trajectories to examine verbal and visuospatial short-term memory development in children and adolescents with Williams and Down syndromes. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2013; 34: 3421-3432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.012
Jarrold C, Baddeley AD, Phillips C. Long-term memory for verbal and visual information in Down syndrome and Williams syndrome: Performance on the doors and people test. Cortex 2007; 43: 233-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70478-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70478-7
Powell L, Houghton S, Douglas G. Comparison of etiology-specific cognitive functioning profiles for individuals with fragile X and individuals with Down syndrome. Journal of Special Education 1997; 31(3): 362-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002246699703100305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699703100305
Iacob I, Musuroi C. Aspects of adapting the intervention program to the particular learning profile of children with Down syndrome. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2013; 84: 846-849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.659
Golan O, Baron-Cohen S. Systemizing empathy: Teaching adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism to recognize complex emotions using interactive multimedia. Development and Psychopathology 2006; 18: 591-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579406060305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579406060305
Wainer AL, Ingersoll BR. The use of innovative computer technology for teaching social communication to individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Reach in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2011; 5: 96-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.08.002
Chuang TY, Lee IC, Chen WC. Use of Digital console game for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. US-China Education Review 2010; 7(11): 99-105.
Barnes DE, Yaffe K, Belfor N, Jagust WJ, DeCarli C, Reed BR, Kramer JH. Computer-based cognitive training for mild cognitive impairment: Results from a pilot randomized, controlled trial. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 2009; 23(3): 205-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e31819c6137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e31819c6137
Cipriani G, Bianchetti A, Trabucchim M. Outcomes of a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program on Alzheimer’s disease patients compared with those on patients affected by mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2006; 43: 327-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2005.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2005.12.003
Lee GY, Yip C, Yu E, Man D. Evaluation of a computer-assisted errorless learning-based memory training program for patients with early Alzheimer’s disease in Hong Kong: A pilot study. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2013; 8: 623-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S45726
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
