Neural Correlates of Causal Inferences and Semantic Priming in People with Williams Syndrome: An fMRI Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.04.13Keywords:
Neuroimaging, Williams syndrome, causal inference, semantic priming, atypical development.Abstract
This study aimed at examining the ability of causal inferences and semantic priming of people with Williams syndrome (WS). Previous studies pointed out that people with WS showed deviant sentence comprehension, given advantageous lexical semantics. This study investigated the impairment in connecting words in the semantic network by using neuroimaging techniques to reveal neurological deficits in the contextual integration of people with Williams syndrome. Four types of word pairs were presented: causal, categorical, associative, and functional. Behavioural results revealed that causal word pairs required heavier cognitive processing than functional word pairs. Distinct neural correlates of semantic priming confirmed atypical semantic linkage and possible cause of impairment of contextual integration in people with WS. The findings of normal behaviours and atypical neural correlates in people with WS provide evidence of atypical development resulted from early gene mutations.
References
Korenberg JR, Chen XN, Hirota H, Lai Z, Bellugi U, Burian D, Roe B, Matsuoka R. Genome structure and cognitive map of Williams syndrome. In Bellugi U, George M St (Eds.) Journey from cognition to brain to gene: Perspectives from Williams syndrome. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2000; pp. 147-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4036.003.0008
Strømme P, Bjømstad PG, Ramstad K. Prevalence estimation of Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Neurology 2002; 17(4): 269-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/088307380201700406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/088307380201700406
Bellugi U, Lichtenberger L, Jones W, Lai Z, George M. The neurocognitive profile of Williams syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Science 2000; 12(1): 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900561959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900561959
Semel E, Rosner SR. Understanding Williams syndrome: Behavioral patterns and interventions. Mahwah: NJ Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates 2003. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607416
Tyler LK, Karmiloff-Smith A, Voice JK, Stevens T, Grant J, Udwin O, et al. Do individuals with Williams syndrome have bizarre semantics? Evidence for lexical organisation using an on-line task. Cortex 1997; 33(3): 515-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70233-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70233-8
Wang P, Bellugi U. Williams syndrome, Down syndrome, and cognitive neuroscience. American Journal of Diseases of Children 1993; 147: 1246-1251. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160350120019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160350120019
Firth U. Autism and "Theory of Mind". In Gillberg C (Ed.) Diagnosis and Treatment of Autism. New York: Plenum Press1989; pp. 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0882-7_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0882-7_4
Hsu CF, Karmiloff-Smith A, Tzeng O, Chin RT, Wang HC. Semantic Knowledge in Williams Syndrome: Insights from Comparing Behavioural and Brain Processes in False Memory Tasks. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning 2007; 6: 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2007.4354074
Hsu CF, Tzeng JL. Contextual effect in people with Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disability 2011; 32(2): 781-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.001
Hsu CF. Contextual integration of causal coherence in people with Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disability 2013a; 34(10): 3332-3342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.031
Hsu CF. Cross-modal contextual coherence of semantic integration in people with Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disability 2013b; 34(12): 4319-4327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.002
Hsu CF. Is the contextual effect weak in people with Williams Syndrome? An investigation of information integration ability using pictures. Research in Developmental Disability 2014c; 34(3): 932-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.11.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.11.015
Hsu CF. Modality Effect of Contextual Integration in People with Williams Syndrome. Research in Developmental Disability 2014a; 35(7): 1571-1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.049
Hsu CF. Cross-domain investigation of weak central coherence in people with Williams syndrome: Asymmetrical brain and behavioral performances in verbal and nonverbal domains. In Porter OH (Ed.) Semantic Memory: Neurobiology, Disorders and Therapeutic Strategies for Improvement. Nova Science Publishers 2014b; pp. 71-82.
Hsu CF, Chen JY. Deviant neural correlates of configural detection in facial processing of people with Williams syndrome. Bulletin of Special Education 2011; 39(1): 61-84.
Frith U, Happé F. Autism: beyond "theory of mind". Cognition 1994; 50: 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90024-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90024-8
Frith U, Happé F. Theory of mind and self consciousness: What is it like to be autistic? Mind and Language 1999; 14: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00100
Happé F. Autism: cognitive deficits or cognitive style. Trends in Cognitive Science 1999; 3(6): 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01318-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01318-2
Happé F, Frith U. The neuropsychology of autism. Brain 1996; 19: 1377-1400. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.4.1377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.4.1377
Hsu CF, Karmiloff-Smith A, Tzeng O, Chin RT, Wang HC. Semantic Knowledge in Williams Syndrome: Insights from Comparing Behavioural and Brain Processes in False Memory Tasks. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning 2007; 6: 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2007.4354074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2007.4354074
Roediger HL, McDermott KB. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995; 21: 803-814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.803
Pinheiro AP, Galdo-Alvarez S, Sampaio A, Niznikiewicz M, Goncalves OF. Electrophysiological correlates of semantic processing in Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disability 2010; 31: 1412-1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.06.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.06.017
Hsu CF. Semantic Priming and Associative Priming in People with Williams Syndrome. In Duncan LT (Ed.) Advances in Health and Disease. Nova Science Publishers 2017; Vol. 2: pp. 171-196.
Bransford J, Franks J. The abstraction of linguistic ideas: A review. Cognition 1972; 1: 213-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(72)90020-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(72)90020-0
Bransford J, Franks J. A brief note on linguistic integration. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1974a; 13(2): 217-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80046-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80046-0
Bransford J, Franks J. Memory for syntactic form as a function of semantic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974b; 103(5): 1037-1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037395
Mills DL, Alvarez TD, George MS, Appelbaum LG, Bellugi U, Neville H. Electrophysiological studies of face processing in Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000; 12(1): 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900561977 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900561977
Neville H, Mills D, Bellugi U. Effects of altered auditory sensitivity and age of language acquisition on the development of language-relevant neural system: Preliminary studies of Williams syndrome. In Broman S, Grafman J (Eds.) Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders: Implications for brain function. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association 1994; pp. 67-83.
Hsu CF. Contextual Effects on Semantic Grouping in People with Down Syndrome. International Journal of Developmental Disability 2019; 65(2): 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2017.1353659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2017.1353659
Hsu CF. Contextual integration of causal coherence in people with Down syndrome: Evidence from figurative comprehension. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities-Diagnosis and Treatment 2016b; 4(1): 55-62. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2016.04.01.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2016.04.01.7
Chen RH, Chen CY. Wechsler Scale Intelligence Test for Children. 4th Ed. (Chinese Version). Taipei: Bookstore for Chinese Behavioral Science 2010.
Chen RH, Chen CY. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd Ed. (Chinese Version). Taipei: Bookstore for Chinese Behavioral Science 2002.
Cabeza R, Nyberg L. Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000; 12(1): 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290051137585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290051137585
Satpute AB, Fenker DB, Waldmann MR, Tabibnia G, Holyoak KJ, Lieberman MD An fMRI study of causal judgments. European Journal of Neuroscience 2005; 22: 1233-1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04292.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04292.x
Rossell SL, Price C, Nobre AC. The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 550-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00181-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00181-1
Sass K, Sachs O, Krach S, Kircher T. Taxonomic and thematic categories: Neural correlates of categorisation in an auditory-to-visual priming task using fMRI. Brain Research 2009; 1270: 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.013
Halit H, Grice S, Bolton P, Johnson MH. Face and gaze processing in Prader-Willi syndrome. Journal of Neuropsychology 2008; 2(1): 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1348/174866407X243305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/174866407X243305
Karmiloff-Smith A. Crucial differences between developmental cognitive neuroscience and adult neuropsychology. Developmental Neuropsychology 1997; 13(4): 513- 524. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649709540693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649709540693
Karmiloff-Smith A. Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Science 1998; 2(10): 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01230-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01230-3
Karmiloff-Smith A. Atypical epigenesis. Developmental Science 2007; 10(1): 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00568.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00568.x
Karmiloff-Smith A. Nativism versus neuroconstructivism: Rethinking the study of developmental disorders. Developmental Psychology 2009; 45(1): 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014506
Mareschal D, Johnson MH, Sirois S, Spratling M, Thomas MSC, Westermann G. Neuroconstructivism. Oxford University Press 2007.
Wible CG, Han SD, Spencer MH, Kubicki M, Niznikiewicz MH, Jolesz FA, McCarley RW, Nestor P. Connectivity among semantic associates: An fMRI study of semantic priming. Brain and Language 2006; 97: 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.11.006
Mason R, Just MA. How the brain processes causal inferences in text: A theoretical account of generation and integration component processes utilising both cerebral hemisphere. Psychological Science 2004; 15(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501001.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501001.x
Roser ME, Fugelsang JA, Dunbar KN, Corballis PM. Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference. Neuropsychology 2005; 19(5): 591-602. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.19.5.591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.19.5.591
Straube B, Chatterjee A. Space and time in perceptual causality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010; 4: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00028
Wende KC, Nagel A, Blos J, Stratmann M, Chatterjee A, Kircher T, Straube B. Differences and commonalities in the judgment of causality in physical and social contexts: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2013; 51: 2572-2580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.027
Virtue S, Haberman J, Clancy Z, Parrish T, Beeman MJ. Neural activity of inferences during story comprehension. Brain Research 2006; 1084(1): 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.053
Pryweller JR, Avery SN, Blackford JU, Dykens EM, Thornton-Wells TA. The effect of intellectual ability on functional activation in a neurodevelopmental disorder: preliminary evidence from multiple fMRI studies in Williams syndrome. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders 2012; 4: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-4-24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-4-24