Self-Concept and Time Perspective of Convicts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.02.12Keywords:
Resocialization, rehabilitation, crime, personality, prisonersAbstract
Objective: The purpose of the article is to connect the time perspective of the convicts with their self-concept.
Background: After an extended stay in places of deprivation of liberty, it is difficult for convicts to adapt to the conditions of life in freedom, to restore the social ties that were lost and weakened due to isolation. And therefore, they often fall into the marginal part of the population, cannot find their place in life, and often replenish the number of unemployed or, even worse, re-enter the criminal path and commit crimes.
Method: The following psychological methods were used: the technique of “Who am I?”, which allowed studying the cognitive component of the self-concept; the methodology of personal differential that provides an opportunity to study the emotional component of the self-concept; the self-attitude test questionnaire and the method of F. Zimbardo allowed to determine the main features of the time perspective.
Results: The article reflects the study of convicts based on which a typology of “self-concept” of convicts was proposed. Besides, the results of a study of the temporal perspective of convicts depending on the type of self-concept are presented.
Conclusion: The authors are inclined to believe that a detailed study of this problem will identify and provide effective ways to stimulate the constructive resocialization of various categories of prisoners.
References
Comprehensive Strategy for the Social Rehabilitation of Citizens who Have Liberated from Prisons and who are Registered with the Probation Service in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2017-2019. 2019. https://online.zakon.kz/ document/?doc_id=32654901#pos=0;0.
Paterline BA, Orr D. Adaptation to prison and inmate self-concept. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science 2016; 4(2): 70-79. https://doi.org/10.15640/jpbs.v4n2a6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15640/jpbs.v4n2a6
The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules). 2015. https://www.un.org/en/events/mandeladay/mandela_rules.shtml.
Konopczynski M. Contemporary directions of changes in the theory and practice of resocialization. Creative resocialization – from correction to development. Probation 2009; 1: 63-87. https://www.arch.ms.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/probacja/2009/nr1/5konopczynski.pdf
UNODC. Introductory handbook on the prevention of recidivism and the social reintegration of offenders. 2019. https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/V1802305_-_R.pdf.
Kvasova OG. To the current state of the problem of the temporal perspective of the personality. Historical and Socio-Educational Thought 2012; 5: 137-141.
Golovakha EI, Kronik AA. Psychological time of personality. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka 1984.
Gulla B, Tucholska K, Wysocka-Pleczyk M. Individual time perspective of convicts on imprisonment sentences: Implications for social rehabilitation interactions. Polish Journal of Social Rehabilitation 2015; 10: 297-309.
Morris GB, Zingle H. Irrational beliefs, life orientation, and temporal perspective of prison inmates. Canadian Counsellor 1977; 11(2): 76-80.
Chernysheva EV. Features of representations of persons sentenced to imprisonment about themselves. Paskhi: A Scientific Psychological Journal 2005; 2(12): 210-218.
Makartetskaya YA. Theory of time perspective. Sociology 2015; 4: 11-16.
Burns RB. Essential psychology: For students and professionals in the health and social services. Boston: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1991.
Oluwasanmi LA, Babatola MA, Mayowa IO. A comparative study of the self-concept of inmates and the normals (non-inmates) in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2018; 23(5): 65-68.
Zikra Z, Afdal A, Pilosusan S, Wulandari E. The influence factors of self-acceptance women convict: Preliminary research from counseling. Perspective Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 2019; 382: 474-477. https://doi.org/10.2991/icet-19.2019.120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icet-19.2019.120
Gulevich OA, Sarieva IR. Social psychology. Moscow: Yurait, 2018.
Nalchajyan AA. Mind, consciousness, self-awareness. Yerevan: Aut. Edition 2011.
Zhubrin RV. The identity of a corrupt criminal. Moscow: Prospect, 2019. https://doi.org/10.31085/9785392292400-2019-384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31085/9785392292400-2019-384
Stolarski M, Fieulaine N, Van Beek W. Time perspective theory. Review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo. Cham: Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2
Valickas GK, Gippenreiter YB. Self-assessment of juvenile delinquents. Questions of Psychology 1989; 1: 45-54.
Antonyan YuM, Enikeev MI, Eminov VE. Psychology of the criminal and investigation of crimes. Moscow: Lawyer, 1996.
Amuche CI, Rev Mayange LT. Relationship between self-esteem and personal development of prison inmates in Jalingo, Taraba State Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice 2013; 4(4): 277-283.
The Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On Education”. 2007. https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=18150
The Penal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2014. https://www.unodc.org/res/cld/document/penal-code_html/New_penal_code.pdf.
Rules of the organization of obtaining primary, basic secondary, general secondary, technical, and vocational education of prisoners sentenced to deprivation of liberty. Order of the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan No 516. 2014. https://cis-legislation.com/ document.fwx?rgn=70830.
Rules for the organization of the educational process in distance educational technologies. Order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan No 137. 2015. https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx? rgn=76276.
Pischelko AV. Re-adaptation and resocialization. Moscow: PER SE 2003.
Mardakhayev LV. The complex nature of the resocialization of minors in a penitentiary institution. CITISE 2015; 3(3): 12.
Dmitriev YuA, Kazak BB. Penitentiary psychology. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 2007.