Cognitive Meaning of Inclusive Education of Students with Disability in Regular Education Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2022.10.06.1Keywords:
Educative inclusion schema, disability, mental representation, teachers, regular educationAbstract
Background: Successful inclusive education strongly represents the development of society, promoting better living conditions for students with disabilities.
Objective: This study explored the mental representation of knowledge of inclusive education and disability held by regular education teachers with experience in this field.
Methods: First, participants performed a conceptual definition task through the Natural Semantic Networks technique. Teachers defined ten target concepts related to the cognitive schema of inclusive education. They had 60 seconds to define each target, using verbs, adjectives, nouns, and pronouns, after rating the definers’ quality to conceptualize the target. Subsequently, the authors implemented a constraint satisfaction neural network to simulate the school inclusion schema's behavior and carried out a chronometric cognitive analysis using data from the first study.
Results: Participants organized the educative inclusion meaning on four dimensions (definition, actors' qualities, stakeholders, and inclusion program effects). However, some concepts about school integration and conventional education appeared in the educative inclusion schema. Further, computer simulations showed that participants seem to have an internal locus of control over inclusive actions. Generally, experience with students with disabilities promotes the formation of a favorable educational inclusion schema. However, even though participants in this study have experience in inclusion programs, they are still constructing the inclusive education schema.
Conclusion: The cognitive evaluation provides useful information to empower teachers to be aware of their knowledge and biases on inclusive education and the importance of their work in the success of school inclusion programs.
References
World Health Organization. World report on disability 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/ 2011/en/
Corrigan PW. Mental health stigma as social attribution: Implications for research methods and attitude change. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2000; 7: 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.7.1.48
Corrigan PW, Watson AC. Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry 2002; 1: 16-20.
Morin D, Rivard MCAG, Crocker AG, Boursier CP, Caron J. Public attitudes towards intellectual disability: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2013; 57: 279-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12008
Townsend MAR, Wilton KM, Vakilirad T. Children's attitudes toward peers with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1993; 37: 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb00883.x
Harper DC, Peterson DB. Children of the Philippines: attitudes toward visible physical impairment. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2001; 38: 566-576. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0566:COTPAT>2.0.CO;2
Nowicki EA. A cross‐sectional multivariate analysis of children's attitudes towards disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2006; 50: 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00781.x
McManus JL, Feyes KJ, Saucier DA. Contact and knowledge as predictors of attitudes toward individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2010; 28: 579-590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510385494
Nowicki EA. A meta-analysis of the social competence of children with learning disabilities compared to classmates of low and average to high achievement. Learning Disability Quarterly 2003; 26: 171-188. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593650
Thompson D, Fisher KR, Purcal C, Deeming C, Sawrikar P. Community attitudes to people with disability: Scoping project. Social Policy Research Centre, Disability Studies and Research Centre, University of New South Wales 2011. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2014423
Freeman SF, Alkin MC. Academic and social attainments of children with mental retardation in general education and special education settings. Remedial and Special Education 2000; 21: 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100102
Stainback S, Stainback W, Eds. Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students. Paul H. Brookes Publishing; 1992.
Thomas R, Rose J. School inclusion and attitudes toward people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 2019; 17: 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12322
Keith JM, Bennetto L, Rogge RD. The relationship between contact and attitudes: Reducing prejudice toward individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2015; 47: 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.032
Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006; 90: 751-783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
Magyar A, Krausz A, Kapás ID, Habók A. Exploring Hungarian teachers’ perceptions of inclusive education of SEN students. Heliyon 2020; 6: Article e03851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03851
Molina-Roldán S., Marauri J, Aubert A, Flecha R. How inclusive, interactive learning environments benefit students without special needs. Frontiers in Psychology 2021; 12: 661427. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661427
van Kessel R, Hrzic R, Cassidy S, Brayne C, Baron-Cohen S, Czabanowska K, Roman-Urrestarazu A. Inclusive education in the European Union: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of education policy for autism. Social Work in Public Health 2021; 36: 286-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2021.1877590
Council of Europe. Malaga ministerial declaration on people with disabilities: progressing towards full participation as citizens 2003. Available from: https://www.coe.int/t/dg1/ legalcooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/cy%20activity%20interface2006/rec%202003%20(4)%20pol%20parties%20EN.pdf.
Council of Europe. Action Plan to promote the rights and full participation of people with disabilities in society: improving the quality of life of people with disabilities in Europe 2006-2015 2006. Available from: https://www.coe.int/en/web/ disability/action-plan-2006-2015
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. Policy guidelines on inclusion in education 2009. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/ 48223/pf0000177849
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. Towards inclusion in education: Status, trends and challenges 2020. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/ 48223/pf0000374246
Rajšli-Tokoš E. Education of children with developmental disabilities. Norma 2020; 25: 31-42. https://doi.org/10.5937/norma2001031R
Avramidis E, Norwich B. Teachers' attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education 2002; 17: 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056
De Boer A, Pijl SJ, Minnaert A. Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education 2011; 15: 331-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089
Alahbabi A. K-12 special and general education teachers' attitudes toward the inclusion of students with special needs in general education classes in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). International Journal of Special Education 2009; 24: 42-54.
Ross‐Hill R. Teacher attitude towards inclusion practices and special needs students. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 2009; 9: 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2009.01135.x
Kalyva E, Gojkovic D, Tsakiris V. Serbian Teachers' Attitudes towards Inclusion. International Journal of Special Education 2007; 22: 31-36. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/EJ814506.pdf
Ellins J, Porter J. Departmental differences in attitudes to special educational needs in the secondary school. British Journal of Special Education 2005; 32: 188-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2005.00396.x
Scruggs TE, Mastropieri MA. Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958–1995: A research synthesis. Exceptional children 1996; 63: 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299606300106
Jobling A, Moni KB. I never imagined I'd have to teach these children: providing authentic learning experiences for secondary pre‐service teachers in teaching students with special needs. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 2004; 32: 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866042000206026
Gaad E, Khan L. Primary Mainstream Teachers' Attitudes towards Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs in the Private Sector: A Perspective from Dubai. International Journal of Special Education 2007; 22: 95-109. Retrieved January 15, 2022, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ814493.pdf
Hodkinson A. Conceptions and misconceptions of inclusive education: A critical examination of final-year teacher trainees' knowledge and understanding of inclusion. Research in Education 2005; 73: 15-28. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.73.2
Gonzalez-Trujillo CJ, Lopez-Ramirez, EO, Gonzalez-Canales MA. (2019, December 18-20). Teachers' meaning formation and mental concept representation of inclusion [Paper presentation]. In 2nd International Conference on Education Technology Management, ICETM 2019. Barcelona, España. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375900.3375903
Lopez REO, Morales MGE, Hedlefs AMI, Gonzalez TCJ. New empirical directions to evaluate online learning. International Journal of Advances in Psychology 2014; 3: 40-47. https://doi.org/10.14355/ijap.2014.0302.03
Figueroa JG, Gonzalez EG, Solís, VM. An approach to the problem of meaning: Semantic networks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1976; 5: 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067252
Lopez EO. Schematically related word recognition (Publication No. 9613356) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global 1996. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203508
Lopez EO, Theios J. Semantic analyzer of schemata Organization (SASO). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1992; 24: 277-285.
Morales-Martinez GE, Lopez-Ramirez EO. EVCOG Modulo 1. Configurador RSN [EVCOG Module 1. NSN Configurator] (Version 1.1.) [Computer software]. Public Registry of Copyright 2018ª; 03-2018-111311554300-01
Morales-Martinez GE, Lopez-Ramirez EO. EVCOG Modulo 2. Capturador RSN [EVCOG Module 2. NSN Data storage] (Version 1.1.) [Computer software]. Public Registry of Copyright 2018b; 03-2018-1113115235001
Morales-Martinez GE, Lopez-Ramirez EO. EVCOG Modulo 3. Editor RSN [EVCOG Module 3. NSN Editor] (Version 1.1.) [Computer software]. Registro Public Registry of Copyright 2018c; 03-2018-1113115235001
Morales-Martinez GE, Lopez-Ramirez EO. EVCOG Modulo 4. Análisis RSN [EVCOG Module 4. NSN Analysis] (Version 1.1.) [Computer software]. Registro Public Registry of Copyright 2018d; 03-2018-1113115235001
Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M Gephi: An open-source software for exploring and manipulating networks [Paper presentation]. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Third International ICWSM Conference, San Jose, California, United States of America 2009, May 17-20. Available from: https://gephi.org/publications/gephi-bastian-feb09.pdf
Morales-Martinez GE, Hedlefs-Aguilar MI, Trejo-Quintana J, Mezquita-Hoyos YN, Sanchez-Monroy M. Chronometric constructive cognitive learning evaluation model: Measuring the consolidation of the human cognition schema in psychology students' memory. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 2021; 20: 56-72. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.5.4
Petra-Micu I, Cortés-Morelos J, Talayero-Uriarte JA, Fouilloux-Morales M. Representación semántica del término psicología médica en estudiantes de medicina: un estudio longitudinal. FEM: Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica 2015; 18: 79-86. https://doi.org/10.33588/fem.181.759