ijcs
Abstract : The Predictive Effects of Self-Esteem, Moral Self, and Moral Reasoning on Delinquent Behaviors of Hong Kong Young People
The Predictive Effects of Self-Esteem, Moral Self, and Moral Reasoning on Delinquent Behaviors of Hong Kong Young People DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2014.03.12 Published: 24 April 2014 |
Abstract: While external factors such as family and peers were widely known to be predictive of juvenile delinquency, mixed results were reported regarding the effects of internal (personal) variables such as self-concept and moral reasoning maturity. The present study was to delineate the effects of two variables relating to the self (self-esteem, moral self) and the moral reasoning maturity in predicting delinquency. A sample of 266 young people aged between 17 and 21 were invited to complete a questionnaire composed of global self-concept (self-esteem) scale, moral self scale, moral reasoning test, and a daily behavior checklist. Regression and correlation analyses indicated that moral self and moral reasoning were in general negatively associated with delinquency, but global self-esteem did not have significant linear relation with delinquency. Polynomial contrast tests revealed that moral reasoning and moral self to certain extent had a linear trend with delinquency negatively, but global self-esteem exhibited a curvilinear (U-shape) trend with some but not all delinquent behaviors such as sexual misconduct, drug offenses, gambling. The results were then discussed in the light of self-derogation theory and other relevant theories such as the “threatened ego” and the multidimensional model of self-concept, and hopefully could throw lights to explain the phenomenon for further research. Keywords: Moral reasoning, moral self, delinquency.Download Full Article |
Abstract : Malicious Peace: Violent Criminal Organizations, National Governments and Truces
Malicious Peace: Violent Criminal Organizations, National Governments and Truces DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2014.03.11 Published: 21 April 2014 |
Abstract: Truces among violent criminal organizations, like gangs and organized crime syndicates, which occur with national government support fall into a unique gap between understandings of crime and internal state violence. Recent national level gang truces in Central America and the Caribbean fall into this gap; the truces are designed to lower homicide rates and move some members of criminal groups towards legal activities. However, there is precious little research examining multiple truces in different countries as a group so that lessons may be drawn for other countries suffering from high levels of violence at the hands of criminal organizations. With violent criminal organizations as the main threat to the national security of many states, shedding light on how to reduce extreme levels of violence is vital. Close examination of attempted and implemented truces in Belize, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Trinidad and Tobago reveals that a constellation of factors leads national governments to be receptive to such agreements and violent criminal groups to accede to them. Keywords: Gangs, truces, Latin America, Caribbean, violence.Download Full Article |
Abstract : Is the Crime of Aggression Really Accountable? Reflections about Syria
Is the Crime of Aggression Really Accountable? Reflections about Syria DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2014.03.09 Published: 20 March 2014 |
Abstract: Nobody can deny that Syria’s situation is really serious, and requires an effective solution from the international community. However, that “intervention/solution” will have to respect the UN Charter and the Security Council’s responsibilities like the non intervention principle and the new definition of the crime of aggression adopted in Kampala in 2010. This paper analyses the role of major powers (especially the USA and France) and the hypothetic application of the article 8 bis of the Rome Statute, if the Security Council is not able to find a consensus, and a “unilateral” solution was carried out by the aforementioned powerful States. Keywords: ICC, aggression, Security Council, non intervention principle, unilateral intervention.Download Full Article |
Abstract : U.S. Territorial Exclusion in Federal Sentencing Research: Can it be Justified?
U.S. Territorial Exclusion in Federal Sentencing Research: Can it be Justified? DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2014.03.10 Published: 20 March 2014 |
Abstract: There is a dearth of knowledge on sentencing process and outcomes in Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands. It is not uncommon for researchers conducting national studies to intentionally exclude data from these American territories. Their actions have been justified on the grounds that territories have “distinctive” characteristics that warrant exclusion. Using federal sentencing data, this study explores whether the sentencing patterns observed in the territories are as “unique” as scholars assume and if so, in what ways and to what extent. Descriptive analysis reveals that attributes of offenders and case processing strategies are similar across the U.S. mainland and its territories. Although multivariate analysis revealed some notable differences (e.g., territories are more punitive than states) the larger finding is that there are more similarities than differences with regards to the processing of cases and outcomes. Implications of the study and directions for future research are discussed. Keywords: American territories, sentencing, U.S. mainland.Download Full Article |