ijcs
|
|
Abstract: The main aim of the study is to systematize materials on the creative work of Galimyan Gilmanov, the Tatar writer of the second half of the twentieth century. Until now, the attention of literary scholars has been riveted to the "adult" prose of the writer (such novels as "Evil Spirits," "Flying People"). G. Gilmanov managed to declare himself as a children's poet, prose writer, and a playwright. The novelty of the work is to study the contribution of the writer to the development of modern children's drama. The work proved that G. Gilmanov works in traditional technology. In his plays, a linear plot is used. Moral issues dominate the content. The central conflict in his plays is the struggle between good and evil, the clash of individualism and collectivism. The character system is dominated by the contrast between positive and negative characters. A favorite technique for organizing text is the antithesis. The playwright actively uses the "speaking name" technique to characterize the characters. Keywords: Tatar literature, Children's literature, Galimyan Gilmanov, Children's drama. |
|
|
Abstract: A concretizing link is an expression of a specific relationship between concepts using a unique means of relation. Given that, affixes and forms of verbs have a particular place. This article considers the conditions of the infinitive (-ырга/-ергә/-рга) and the conditional mood of the verb (-са/-сә). These affixes in Tatar grammars as part of a subordinate predicate clause are inflectional forms, that is, linking words. The authors study these verb forms to express a concretizing relation and analyze the shades of meanings. A more profound analysis shows that these affixes express different relations between phenomena and connect the verb with other words. They are added to all the verbs and some parts of speech when in speaking. It must be said that the affixes of the conditional mood and, to some extent, the infinitive perform the same functions for the verb as the cases do for the noun. The primary research method is descriptive-analytical with its main components: observation, generalization, and interpretation. For a detailed analysis of the linguistic features of speech, a comparative historical method is also used, which allows for the determination of some tendencies in the development of the grammatical system of the national literary language. In the studies, comparative-typological and statistical methods are also applied. Keywords: Concretizing relation, conditional mood, infinitive, means of link, shades of meanings. |
|
|
Abstract: Currently, the sphere of social entrepreneurship has low popularity among business representatives. Current trends are being actively discussed at the level of government bodies; however, the existing financial support and the low level of impact of state regulation instruments do not allow revealing the potential of social enterprise fully. Undoubtedly, social entrepreneurship is a relatively new phenomenon for Russia and has a number of features, conditioned, on the one hand, by the specifics of the national economy, and by the prevailing social relations on the other. The primary purpose of the study is to investigate features of social entrepreneurship development in Primorsky territory. Keywords: Social Entrepreneurship, Primorsky Territory, social events, government, self-sufficiency, effectiveness evaluation. |
|
|
Abstract: The article demonstrates that interdisciplinarity is not only a characteristic of the modern stage of scientific knowledge, as it is usually stated. Nevertheless, it is a methodological expression of the ambiguous nature of knowledge about any social subject, which makes us consider it as a requirement for adequate social knowledge. This nature of knowledge about a social subject stems from the fact that every existing thing (including a social one), always, “by nature” in relations with other things, discovers that it is itself (“the truth of its existence”), only through this relationship, only through another thing, only in interaction with it. We can call this the nature of a thing; the way it exists. Moreover, if all the definitions of a thing, all knowledge about a thing that arises specifically, as a result of its various relationships with other things, are essential for its understanding and cannot be ignored when defining a thing. Then an adequate knowledge of such a thing (social things) will always be only its knowledge as the dialectical unity of many definitions. This implies that the external expression of this fact is interdisciplinarity as a methodological principle of adequate knowledge. That is, adequate knowledge of a thing (which is always multifaceted) is possible only through the interaction of the potential of separate, historically developed systems of concepts that correspond to these faces and form separate social disciplines, i.e. only as interdisciplinary knowledge. Keywords: Interdisciplinary, Social Knowledge, Social Philosophy, Scientific Cognition, Subject (Thing). |
|
|
Abstract: The main aim of the study is to analyze the phenomenon of creativity, which has traditionally been the subject of philosophical investigation. Moreover, the phenomenon of philosophy itself as a creative process often remained in the shadow of general problems. By tacit agreement the creative nature of philosophy was recognized as obvious, and therefore, as a subject of philosophizing, it was often simply left out of the picture. However, again and again, the thesis about the “death of philosophy” makes the question of its creative nature more than relevant. If the creative potential of philosophy has been exhausted, perhaps it is really dying as a special form of thought in culture. If creativity in philosophy is possible, then its cultural prospects become more optimistic, or cultural elimination of philosophy is associated not only (or not so much) with its creative capacity. Creativity became the object of theorization in the Renaissance and Modernity, when man was initially thought of as its subject. Therefore, the very understanding of creativity bears the mark of Modern thinking. However, the "post-" situation forces us to return to the analysis of the problem and consider it in terms of the impossibility of the new. The problem can and should also be considered on the material of Russian philosophical thought, whose status has always been ambiguous, primarily for Russian philosophy itself. Today, the position of Russian philosophy is becoming even more problematic due to the problematization of philosophy as a particular discourse that claims to be universal, on the one hand, and the specifics of Russian theoretical thought labeled as "responsive", its empathicity – on the other. Keywords: Creativity, The New, Progress, “Death of Philosophy”, Russian Philosophy. |